X
Archive by tag: Payne & FearsReturn

Governor Signs AB5 Into Law — Reshaping California's Independent Contractor Classification Landscape

Yesterday, Governor Gavin Newsom signed California Assembly Bill 5 (“AB5”), controversial legislation which will have a substantial impact on California employers when it goes into effect on January 1, 2020. ...By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Sep 19,2019 |

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Sep 10,2019 |

Key California Employment Law Cases: July 2019

This month's key California employment law cases involve payment of wages, workplace conditions, public employment issues, and civil procedure....By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Sep 04,2019 |

Key California Employment Law Cases: June 2019

This month's key California employment law cases involve EEOC charges, disability discrimination, and meal breaks....By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Aug 30,2019 |

Key California Employment Law Cases: May 2019

This month's key California employment law cases involve the Dynamex case and the effect of prior administrative hearing on a civil lawsuit....By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Aug 27,2019 |

Key California Employment Law Cases: April 2019

This month's key employment law cases address the enforcement of arbitration agreements. Diaz v. Sohnen Enters., 34 Cal. App. 5th 126, 245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2019) Summary:  When employee continues his or her employment after notification that...By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Aug 26,2019 |

Employers Must Consider Time Off Requests in Light of FMLA and State Law

On August 8, 2019, the Department of Labor issued an Opinion Letter explaining that employees may take leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) to attend a meeting discussing their child’s Individualized Education Plan (“IEP”). The...By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Aug 24,2019 |

Ninth Circuit Backtracks On Dynamex Retroactivity

As we previously reported, on May 2, 2019, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l, No. 17-16096, held that the California Supreme Court's landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal....By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Aug 21,2019 |

Even On-Duty Meal Periods Must Last at Least 30 Minutes

While the California Labor Code specifies that an off-duty meal period must consist of at least 30 minutes of uninterrupted time during which the employee is relieved of all duties, the duration requirement for an on-duty meal period has been less...By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Aug 12,2019 |

No "End Run" Around Brinker Under Section 17200

The California Court of Appeal has affirmed a complete victory by Safeway Inc. over a certified class of wage-and-hour plaintiffs. Esparza v. Safeway Inc., et al., B287927 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC369766, June 10, 2019). The published...By: Payne & Fears
Read More
Payne & Fears | Jun 26,2019 |
Page 3 of 3 [3] NextLast