X
Archive by tag: Orrick - Antitrust WatchReturn

Merger Non-Compete Clauses – Be Lawful or Be Gone

Non-compete clauses are commonly included in M&A agreements. Although generally recognized as lawful, non-competes must fulfill certain requirements to comply with antitrust and competition laws. A recent FTC enforcement action further clarifies...By: Orrick - Antitrust Watch
Read More
Orrick - Antitrust Watch | Sep 19,2019 |

Another Reminder That the UK Merger Control Regime Is More Than Just Voluntary

On 6 August 2019, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (the “CMA”) imposed an ‘Unwinding Order’ on a U.S. company, Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc (“Bottomline”), active in the business payment automation technology space, and its UK...By: Orrick - Antitrust Watch
Read More
Orrick - Antitrust Watch | Aug 13,2019 |

Companies, Board Members and Officers Take Note: U.S. Antitrust Agencies Are Focused on Interlocking Directorates

The FTC and the DOJ Antitrust Division have again warned companies, along with their board members and officers, of the legal prohibition on interlocking directorates: when an individual, or an organization’s agent(s), simultaneously serves as an...By: Orrick - Antitrust Watch
Read More
Orrick - Antitrust Watch | Jul 25,2019 |

Toward Uncharted Waters – The CVS-Aetna Merger

On June 4 – 5, 2019, Judge Richard J. Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held an extraordinary and unprecedented evidentiary hearing to decide whether to enter the proposed Final Judgment in U.S. v. CVS/Aetna requiring the...By: Orrick - Antitrust Watch
Read More
Orrick - Antitrust Watch | Jun 12,2019 |
Page 2 of 2 [2] NextLast