X

News & Insights

 
01Apr

Heightened Standard of Care for Special Needs Students

4/1/2016| Reference Number : 70.0| Legal, School Bus | Special Needs Students | | Return|

The Federal District Court in Pennsylvania recently confirmed that drivers, aides, and schools are held to a heightened duty or standard of care when transporting special needs students because such students are more vulnerable to harm. The recent case of K.M. v Chichester School District, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16416, explained that a bus driver’s and aide’s error in leaving an autistic child on the bus at the end of a run and the related lack of appropriate training and policies amounted to “deliberate indifference”.  Request this article today by emailing help@rckelly.com to read the details of the Court’s findings regarding the claim presented by the parents and the student.

Contact Us to read the Full Article. 

Related

Controlling the School Bus Environment

Controlling the School Bus Environment

How school bus contractors respond when a student acts out on the school bus is a balancing act of k...

Read More >
Positive Drug Tests – SAP Program and Return to Duty

Positive Drug Tests – SAP Program and Return to Duty

When a school bus driver fails a drug or alcohol test, refuses to submit to required testing, or oth...

Read More >
School Bus Contractors have Legal Right to IEP Information

School Bus Contractors have Legal Right to IEP Information

Do you know all the essential information about the students on your bus? Do the school districts yo...

Read More >
Legal Focus: Assuring Compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act

Legal Focus: Assuring Compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act

School bus contractors are required to comply with many laws and regulations to ensure legal complia...

Read More >
US Supreme Court Invalidates EEOC Guidance Allowing Summary Dismissal of Retaliation Claims

US Supreme Court Invalidates EEOC Guidance Allowing Summary Dismissal of Retaliation Claims

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended prohibits employment discrimination and retalia...

Read More >

Search

Categories