07Jun
California Court of Appeals Weighs in on the Duty to Defend and Suggests “Fetch” New Motion
It’s not uncommon for construction contracts to include indemnity provisions requiring the indemnitor (typically, the lower-tiered party) to “defend, indemnify and hold harmless” the indemnitee (typically, the higher-tiered party) from third-party...
By:
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
Related
Employers in Ontario will likely welcome the decision in Katz et al. v. Clarke, 2019 ONSC 2188 (Divi...
Read More >
This week’s post is Family Feud Style. Name Three Things That Sound Like They Would Be “Joint Empl...
Read More >
Well, that was remarkably quick. Just days after WeWork’s board announced that it was considering r...
Read More >
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York recently rejected the government’s arg...
Read More >
Truck accident lawsuits are substantially different than regular motor vehicle accident cases. Accid...
Read More >
In Skye Mineral Investors LLC v. DXS Capital (U.S.) Limited, et al., the Delaware Court of Chancery ...
Read More >