X
07Jun

California Court of Appeals Weighs in on the Duty to Defend and Suggests “Fetch” New Motion

It’s not uncommon for construction contracts to include indemnity provisions requiring the indemnitor (typically, the lower-tiered party) to “defend, indemnify and hold harmless” the indemnitee (typically, the higher-tiered party) from third-party...
By: Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-court-of-appeals-weighs-in-27729/

Related

Federal Court Halts Enforcement of California Arbitration Law

A California federal court has granted a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of Assembly Bil...

Read More >

NLRB Clarifies Use of Mandatory Arbitration Post-Epic Systems

On August 14, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a ruling clarifying several man...

Read More >

Preemptive Wordsmithing: Considering Future Alterations of Commercial Property at the Outset

Borrowers often envision future alterations to enhance the economic value of the commercial real est...

Read More >

Australian Taxation Office Increases Scrutiny of Australian Inbound Investments

The Situation: The Australian Taxation Office ("ATO") has broadened its role in the process for revi...

Read More >

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company ...

Read More >

Amendments to Japan Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act Now in Effect

The amendments aim to promote foreign direct investments for sound economic growth, while still ensu...

Read More >