07Jun
California Court of Appeals Weighs in on the Duty to Defend and Suggests “Fetch” New Motion
It’s not uncommon for construction contracts to include indemnity provisions requiring the indemnitor (typically, the lower-tiered party) to “defend, indemnify and hold harmless” the indemnitee (typically, the higher-tiered party) from third-party...
By:
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
Related
In a recent decision, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) reaffirmed that, even whe...
Read More >
On June 24, 2019, the United States Supreme Court decided Dutra Group v. Batterton, No. 18-266, hold...
Read More >
Employers in the hospitality and restaurant industry are poised for celebration: the Department of L...
Read More >
Navigating the U.S. Healthcare Regulatory Landscape for Wearable Devices - Complex Environment Inc...
Read More >
A new wage theft ordinance coming to the City of Minneapolis in 2020 places more stringent requireme...
Read More >
COVID-19 presents novel issues for underwriters, who are grappling with the need to support their cl...
Read More >