X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

Retail and Consumer Products Law Roundup - October 2019

Supreme Court Declines to Weigh In on Website Accessibility - In a closely watched case that many h...

Read More >

Steps to Take if You Receive a Subcontractor’s COVID-19 Work Suspension Notice

There are increasing reports that some subcontractors have decided to suspend operations during the ...

Read More >

Supreme Court in landmark restrictive covenant ruling

Ms Tillman was employed as Joint Global Head of the Financial Services Practice Group by Egon Zehnde...

Read More >

Minnesota DOLI Once Again Updates Wage Theft Q&A

Employers are now required to comply with the civil provisions of Minnesota’s Wage Theft Statute, w...

Read More >

Beltway Buzz - October 2019 #3

Washington Nationals Stay in the Fight. The Washington Nationals are heading to the World Series for...

Read More >

SECURE Act Increases Access to Retirement Plans with 'Pooled Employer Plans'

For more than seven years now, policymakers and taxpayers have clamored for Congress to change the l...

Read More >