X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

Employee Leaves of Absence: Practical Guidance for Difficult Issues

On Thursday, January 30, members of Verrill’s Labor & Employment Group and Employee Benefits & Exec...

Read More >

METI Expanded Scope of Industries Subject to Prior Notification for Foreign Direct Investment

On May 27, 2019, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI) expanded the scope of t...

Read More >

ISS Expands List of Egregious Equity Plan Factors

As reported in prior blogs, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), a leading proxy advis...

Read More >

The Uk’s Proposed New National Security Investment Screening Regime: Standalone, Mandatory, and Broad in Scope

The proposed regime is a huge departure for the United Kingdom, since it introduces mandatory filing...

Read More >

Top 10 Mistakes in Arizona Employee Handbooks

As an employment law attorney, I am frequently asked to review or prepare employer handbooks. Some o...

Read More >

Beyond Brexit transition – the divergence of UK and EU competition law

The end of the Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 is likely to be a watershed in UK compet...

Read More >