05Sep
Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds
When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
EEOC Clarifies EEO-1 Requirements. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) confirmed that...
Read More >
On February 6, 2020 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a Philadelphia pay equity...
Read More >
Under California’s Proposition 60, which became enacted in 1986 as Revenue and Taxation Code sectio...
Read More >
Construction companies entering into joint venture (JV) contracts should be cautious of entering int...
Read More >
As Arizona employers prepare for 2020, key minimum wages and exempt salary levels under city, state,...
Read More >
The premium that a plaintiff pays for plaintiff adverse costs insurance may be a taxable disbursemen...
Read More >