X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

Delaware Supreme Court Reverses Dismissal of Caremark Claim, Finding Lack of Board-Level Oversight and Director Independence

In Marchand v. Barnhill et al. (“Blue Bell”),1 the Delaware Supreme Court on June 19 unanimously r...

Read More >

Pediatrics 2000 Sued by EEOC for Firing Employee Who Requested Religious Accommodation

Healthcare Provider Fired Jehovah's Witness for Request to Skip Party, Federal Agency Charges - NE...

Read More >

Premises Liability: Comparative Negligence Is Not a Defense in Child Trespasser Case

In a premises liability action, the duty a landowner owes depends on the status assigned to the pers...

Read More >

New York Second State to Prohibit Discrimination Based on Hairstyle

New York recently became the second state, after California, to prohibit discrimination based on hai...

Read More >

Are You Willing to Wait a Year? Popularity of CLT Leads to Growing Pains for Suppliers

The Daily Journal of Commerce recently reported that increased demand for mass-timber material, such...

Read More >

Maine Expands Antidiscrimination Law and Restricts Noncompete Agreements

Lawmakers in Maine closed out the 2019 legislative session with a flurry of activity. Legislators pa...

Read More >