X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

North Carolina Court Awards $41 Thousand-Plus Penalty For Failure To Produce Documents Requested By Plan Participants

Section 104(b)(4) of ERISA provides that a plan administrator must respond to a written request for ...

Read More >

How A/E/C Firms Can Use Social Media To Keep Projects Visible During A Pandemic

Pre-pandemic, commuting workers and visiting travelers provided construction projects with built-in ...

Read More >

A Primer on the SEC's Regulation Best Interest for Plan Fiduciaries

On June 5, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted a final version of the Reg...

Read More >

Governor Cuomo Announces Plan to Eliminate Tip Credit for Employees Outside the Hospitality Industry

The New York State Department of Labor, after holding multiple hearings across the state regarding t...

Read More >

OFCCP Releases New Technical Assistance Guides

Under the leadership of Craig Leen, OFCCP has made a renewed commitment to providing technical assis...

Read More >

FTC Commissioners Question Use of Divestiture as an Effective Merger Remedy

Divestiture has long been considered an appropriate and effective remedy for anticompetitive horizon...

Read More >