X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

California’s OEHHA Finalizes Regulation Rescinding Warning Requirement For Coffee

On June 7, 2019, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced that it has ...

Read More >

Unpaid work – Beware the offer of a ‘free lunch’

The line between lawful and unlawful unpaid work is not always clear. Many companies are contacted ...

Read More >

French Supreme Court Validates Statutory Scale of Compensation for Unfair Dismissal Cases

Since September 24, 2017, the compensation to which employees are entitled in unjust dismissal actio...

Read More >

US Antitrust Laws: Investment Guidance for Deals, Dealmakers Amid Economy’s Inevitable Rebound

US antitrust laws already on the books facilitate rapid investment without government delay: importa...

Read More >

Understanding the 'Notice' Defense

The lack of timely notice is a defense to traumatic injury claims.  A claimant must provide notice o...

Read More >

Three-Year Delay Not “Prompt Notice,” But Insurer Not “Appreciably Prejudiced” Either, New Jersey Court Holds

In Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company v. East Coast Painting & Maintenance, LLC, 2019 U.S. Dis...

Read More >