X
31Jul

Defence + Indemnity - August 2019: Case Summary: Stewart et al. v Wood et al

Field Law | | Return|
The premium that a plaintiff pays for plaintiff adverse costs insurance may be a taxable disbursement in the litigation. Stewart et al. v. Wood et al., 2019 ONSC 3931, per Tausendfreund, J....
By: Field Law
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/defence-indemnity-august-2019-case-83973/

Related

The SECURE Act: Top 3 Issues to Consider Now

Hundreds of articles have been published over the last two weeks about the SECURE Act (“Act”), whi...

Read More >

Pros & Cons of Behavioral Health Sector Investing

Investing in the behavioral health industry presents both opportunities and challenges for private e...

Read More >

CFIUS: Final FIRRMA Regulations Provide New Challenges, Opportunities for Foreign Investors

The Department of Treasury has released the final regulations implementing the Foreign Investment Ri...

Read More >

OLNS#7 – Flip it Right: Two-Tier U.S. Holding Structures for German Start-ups

Mit unseren auf Technologietransaktionen spezialisierten Teams in allen wichtigen globalen Märkten b...

Read More >

Warning: Your 2020 PBGC Premiums Could Be Much Higher than You Expect

Pension plans that are not fully funded for PBGC purposes have two parts to their PBGC premium. One ...

Read More >

Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Healthcare Construction Projects

The COVID-19 pandemic is causing disruption to a wide range of industries and construction in the he...

Read More >