X
31Jul

Defence + Indemnity - August 2019: Case Summary: Stewart et al. v Wood et al

Field Law | | Return|
The premium that a plaintiff pays for plaintiff adverse costs insurance may be a taxable disbursement in the litigation. Stewart et al. v. Wood et al., 2019 ONSC 3931, per Tausendfreund, J....
By: Field Law
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/defence-indemnity-august-2019-case-83973/

Related

New Jersey Federal Court Forces a Software Company to Confront the Question at Trial: Did Your Employee Quit or Was He Fired?

On May 23, 2019, the New Jersey District Court in Kunal Shah v. Meditab Software, Inc. refused to di...

Read More >

Window On Washington - Vol. 3, Issue 44

Outlook for This Week in the Nation’s Capital - Recess. Congress is in recess until December 2 for...

Read More >

FCA: Working from Home Heightens Insider Trading Risks

In an October 12 speech, the Director of Market Oversight for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) ...

Read More >

Israel's Construction and Infrastructure Sector Recognized as an Essential Field

On March 22, 2020, emergency regulations were published in Israel on limiting market activity for th...

Read More >

What the HRA is going on with HRAs?

On June 13, the Departments of Labor, Treasury and Health and Human Services jointly released final ...

Read More >

[Video] 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program-Day 31-Levels of Due Diligence

Due diligence is generally recognized in three levels: Level I, Level II and Level III. Each level i...

Read More >