X
31Jul

Defence + Indemnity - August 2019: Case Summary: Stewart et al. v Wood et al

Field Law | | Return|
The premium that a plaintiff pays for plaintiff adverse costs insurance may be a taxable disbursement in the litigation. Stewart et al. v. Wood et al., 2019 ONSC 3931, per Tausendfreund, J....
By: Field Law
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/defence-indemnity-august-2019-case-83973/

Related

Effective Remedial Action Does Not Require Crystal Ball, Rules Iowa Court

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Sellars v. CRST Expedited, Inc. Case No. C15-117-LTS (July 15, 2019), the Nort...

Read More >

What Is Aggressive Driving? The 7 Most Common Examples

Let's be honest; we've all been there. You're running late for work. Your kid is late for football p...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - Panama - Q4 2019

Effects of Declaration of December 20, 2019, as a National Mourning Day - New Order or Decree - On...

Read More >

Digging into the New HRA Regulations Part 1 – Individual Coverage HRAs

As discussed in our June 18th blog entry, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and T...

Read More >

How Do Mergers & Acquisitions Impact Pending Bids?

Given the continued high volume of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transactions in the federal market...

Read More >

CFIUS: Proposed FIRRMA Regulations Define CFIUS's Expanded Jurisdiction and Mandatory Filing Requirements

On September 17, the US Department of the Treasury issued comprehensive proposed regulations to impl...

Read More >