X
31Jul

Defence + Indemnity - August 2019: Case Summary: Stewart et al. v Wood et al

Field Law | | Return|
The premium that a plaintiff pays for plaintiff adverse costs insurance may be a taxable disbursement in the litigation. Stewart et al. v. Wood et al., 2019 ONSC 3931, per Tausendfreund, J....
By: Field Law
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/defence-indemnity-august-2019-case-83973/

Related

Beyond Brexit transition - Brexit uncertainty creates an opportunity for European investment by Japenese companies

Japanese companies have long seen the UK as a gateway into Europe. However, the daunting prospect of...

Read More >

Syndicated lending and competition law – what are the key risks?

In April 2019, the European Commission (EC) published a report on "EU loan syndication and its impac...

Read More >

Are Law Firm Mandatory Retirement Policies Enforceable? In This Instance – Yes.

Von Kaenel v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, No. 18-2850 (8th Cir. 2019) The question whether an individu...

Read More >

[Video] Compliance into the Weeds: Episode 138-the Juniper Networks FCPA Enforcement Action

Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance relat...

Read More >

No pain, no gain – English court finds that interim payments under a joint venture contract should not be adjusted for cost overruns

Construction companies entering into joint venture (JV) contracts should be cautious of entering int...

Read More >

Renewable Energy Update - February 2020 #3

California’s solar mandate to deliver more than 1 GW Bullet - PV Magazine – February 13 - Cali...

Read More >