24Jan
Court Holds That An Employer May Rely On Employee's Promise Not To Compete
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court held that covenants not to compete were "invalid under section 16600 in California, even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the applicable statutory...
By:
Allen Matkins
Related
An employee sued her former employer alleging that she was unlawfully terminated under federal law. ...
Read More >
Investment funds may face enhanced premerger reporting requirements under a new rule jointly propose...
Read More >
As summer turned to fall, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) issued a st...
Read More >
Starting February 1, 2020, covered District of Columbia employers must notify employees about their ...
Read More >
In a case of first impression, the Ninth Circuit overturned 35 years of precedent and ruled that ERI...
Read More >
For private equity transactions going forward during the COVID-19 crisis, and for those occurring se...
Read More >