15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) doesn’t cover an employee’s leave to care for the healthy ...
Read More >
The 359-page emergency Coronavirus Bill received royal assent on 25 March 2020. This newly passed Co...
Read More >
It's no longer just bidding! Bricker attorneys Casey Cross and Chris McCloskey will share the risk f...
Read More >
The North Carolina Court of Appeals recently determined that a builder who fails to comply with stat...
Read More >
During college in the 1970s, I spent my summers working as a framer in residential construction; I w...
Read More >
Amid the unprecedented conditions that businesses have been forced to operate under, real estate and...
Read More >