15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
There has been a lot of talk about how much more pro-business the U.S. Department of Labor was going...
Read More >
The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) issued a July 24th news r...
Read More >
In this period of significant market volatility and economic headwinds, risk allocation provisions i...
Read More >
It seems there’s never a dull moment in the U.S.-China bilateral relationship. Public markets relax...
Read More >
On January 23, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a scathing decision...
Read More >
When I graduated from law school, it took a few months before I got my first job. So for the months,...
Read More >