15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
A Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) is a privately owned and operated company that makes long...
Read More >
The government's latest restrictions will impact owners, contractors, and suppliers. The Victorian...
Read More >
Neither rain nor sleet nor quarantine restrictions stop bid protests or our monthly roundup. Thus f...
Read More >
The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published a document setting out its digital mark...
Read More >
1. Non-Competition Agreements Prohibited for Low Wage Earners in Maryland - Maryland law prohibits ...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently issued a decision in employers’ favor by holding...
Read More >