15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
In a tightening job market, more companies are considering offering perks such as gym memberships, f...
Read More >
For years, state governments have claimed they were losing hundreds of millions of dollars in unpaid...
Read More >
Industrial Painting Company Unlawfully Fired Worker Because of His Medically Prescribed Methadone, F...
Read More >
An employer violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it discharged an employee who refu...
Read More >
Le 25 novembre 2020, la Cour de cassation a opéré un revirement de jurisprudence important pour la p...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In two months (on March 31, 2020), the window closes for 403(b) plan sponsors to ...
Read More >