15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
A recent High Court decision serves as a useful reminder of the test the court will apply when decid...
Read More >
California’s AB 51, barring mandatory arbitration agreements in employment, is now facing preemptio...
Read More >
Q: Does OSHA have specific reporting requirements for a death? A: You must report to OSHA any work-...
Read More >
Part III: Due Diligence- This is the third article in our series on “Closing a Private Equity Tran...
Read More >
SCOTUS Reviews "Blissful Ignorance" as Statute of Limitations Defense - On December 4, 2019, the U....
Read More >
In a year of many firsts, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division and the Federal Tr...
Read More >