15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
In what is perhaps an agency first, the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)...
Read More >
As discussed in a previous alert, the 2018–19 New York State budget included provisions designed to...
Read More >
Hospital Refused to Accommodate and Terminated Pregnant Worker, Federal Agency Said - SAN ANTONIO, ...
Read More >
An agreement to arbitrate sexual harassment claims is enforceable pursuant to the Federal Arbitratio...
Read More >
I’m stubborn and there are just some things I don’t understand, so hear me out. I got a call not ...
Read More >
Employment Law attorneys Mark Pihart, Laura Pfeiffer and Rachel Brygger discuss details of Minnesota...
Read More >