X
15Jan

Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act

Snell & Wilmer | | Return|
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By: Snell & Wilmer
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/nevada-supreme-court-finds-that-pay-if-7465412/

Related

California Consumer Privacy Act: A Reference Guide for Compliance

California passed a sweeping new privacy law that will impact many businesses. The California Consum...

Read More >

Retiree Health Insurance Coverage Can Become a Vested Right

Most of the promises contained in a union contract expire on the same date the contract expires, sub...

Read More >

On Monopolies, Fine Dining and Feeding the Masses in California’s First Gilded Age

Every generation tackles old problems anew.  Abject homelessness, “radicalized” socialists, tyrant...

Read More >

Update on Prompt Payment Legislation in Canada

Prompt payment legislation was first introduced in Canada in Ontario on December 12, 2017. The draft...

Read More >

Bay Area COVID-19 Regulations Tracker - UPDATED November #2

In an effort to slow the spread of COVID-19, California on Aug. 31 released the Blueprint for a Safe...

Read More >

Part 24 of “The Restricting Covenant” Series: Choice of Law and Covenants Not to Compete

There are many notable east coast-west coast rivalries. In sports (Celtics versus Lakers basketball)...

Read More >