15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
When a judicial opinion refers to a “bitter feud”, a plaintiff “beset by acrimony”, and a “rock...
Read More >
When an alleged hazard exists and causes a person to be injured, then maybe a business might think a...
Read More >
Prior to July 2nd, New Jersey’s Medical Cannabis Act lacked protections for employees’ off-duty me...
Read More >
On July 5, 2019, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (“TTB”) issued TTB Industry Circular...
Read More >
On October 31, 2019, the Trump Administration revoked Executive Order 13495, Nondisplacement of Qual...
Read More >
One of the key issues to be addressed in M&A transactions is the determination of the purchase price...
Read More >