15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
When landowners oppose a project that involves the rezoning of a neighboring property, they almost a...
Read More >
Most 401(k) plans have an investment policy statement to serve as a blueprint on how and why investm...
Read More >
Carroll v. City & Cnty. of S.F., 41 Cal. App. 5th 805, 254 Cal. Rptr. 3d 519 (2019) - Summary: Eac...
Read More >
McDermott continues its dialogue with renewable industry leaders to provide the latest market update...
Read More >
The California Consumer Privacy Act (the CCPA), effective January 1, 2020, defines sweeping new priv...
Read More >
After much anticipation, on September 24, 2019 the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final ...
Read More >