15Jan
Nevada Supreme Court Finds That Pay-If-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts Are Not Per Se Unenforceable Under Prompt Payment Act
In October, the Nevada Supreme Court revisited the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts. Despite being enacted nearly two decades ago and being amended several times since, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act still garners differing opinions regarding the enforceability of pay-if-paid clauses, which the Nevada Supreme Court held requires a case-by-case analysis. In broad terms, the Nevada Prompt Payment Act requires compliance with contractual terms of construction...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
As novel coronavirus has spread from China to Europe, the United States and around the globe, it has...
Read More >
The Situation: The United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division ("DOJ") has provided detai...
Read More >
When approaching a potential new M&A transaction in the face of the volatility and unpredictability ...
Read More >
It appears Oregon will be joining the wave of states enacting laws against hair-based discrimination...
Read More >
On November 14, 2019, the U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship held a hearin...
Read More >
On July 23, 2020, the French Competition Authority (the "Authority") published its new guidelines on...
Read More >