X
12Feb

Federal Court Explains Order Barring California From Enforcing New Anti-Employment-Arbitration Law

Weintraub Tobin | | Return|
A federal court in Sacramento explained last week its rationale for temporarily barring the State of California from enforcing a new law, AB 51, that would curtail employment arbitration agreements. The rationale set forth in that written order of...
By: Weintraub Tobin
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/federal-court-explains-order-barring-50363/

Related

SDNY: Directors Not Liable For Whistleblower Claims Under SOX

On December 9, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that, as a ...

Read More >

Employment Law Checklist Project: Introduction

One of my colleagues, Mike Chase has, for the last several years, been tweeting at “Crime a Day” a...

Read More >

Dallas Paid Sick Leave Ordinance Faces Legal Challenge

Today two plaintiffs represented by the Texas Public Policy Foundation filed a lawsuit challenging t...

Read More >

7th Circuit Holds Retiree Medical Coverage Vested for Life Based on Unambiguous Durational Language in Collective Bargaining Agreement

It is well established that welfare plans are not subject to the vesting requirements of ERISA. Ther...

Read More >

Environmental Considerations in Corporate Transactions

My partner Bob Melvin and I recently gave a presentation on environmental, health, and safety consid...

Read More >

New York State Overhauls Harassment Laws Making it Easier to Bring Employers to Court

Earlier this summer the New York State Senate and Assembly passed a bill aimed to amend the New York...

Read More >