X
12Feb

Federal Court Explains Order Barring California From Enforcing New Anti-Employment-Arbitration Law

Weintraub Tobin | | Return|
A federal court in Sacramento explained last week its rationale for temporarily barring the State of California from enforcing a new law, AB 51, that would curtail employment arbitration agreements. The rationale set forth in that written order of...
By: Weintraub Tobin
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/federal-court-explains-order-barring-50363/

Related

The SECURE Act Brings Significant Changes for Retirement Plans and IRAs

The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (the SECURE Act), signed into ...

Read More >

Employers Can Now Stand Firmly On Not Paying Employees For The Cost Of Slip-Resistant Shoes

On June 4, 2019, the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District issued an unpublished opinion in Kris...

Read More >

FTC Proposes New HSR Rules Exempting Certain Under-10% Investments And Aggregating Within Fund Families

The Federal Trade Commission, by a 3-2 vote along party lines, has proposed for public comment two m...

Read More >

Plaintiff’s Request for Shoe Reimbursement Slips Out of Court

Interpreting California Labor Code Section 2802, an appellate panel in the state ruled that an emplo...

Read More >

Nevada Bans Discrimination Over Cannabis Use

In January 2020, Nevada will become the first state to bar employers from refusing to hire a prospec...

Read More >

The Competition over Revising and Enforcing Noncompete Agreements in Nevada

The Nevada Legislature and Nevada Supreme Court have not always seen eye-to-eye in the interpretatio...

Read More >