X
28Oct

False Alarm? The Practical Impact of AB 51, California’s New Anti-Arbitration Statute

California recently enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 51, a law that attempts to ban certain mandatory employment arbitration agreements in the state. But what is the practical impact of AB 51 in light of its possible preemption by the Federal Arbitration...
By: Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/false-alarm-the-practical-impact-of-ab-91702/

Related

California High Court Rules That Employers Must Pay Employees For Exit Searches

Why This Matters - Last week, the California Supreme Court dealt tech giant Apple Inc. a blow when ...

Read More >

NLRB Invalidates Mandatory Arbitration Agreement That Contains No Exceptions For Filing Administrative Charges

Seyfarth Synopsis: A new decision reinforces that the National Labor Relations Board will invalidate...

Read More >

PA Amends Background Check Requirement for Employees Working With Children

In 2015, Pennsylvania amended the state Child Protective Services Law to require that employees who ...

Read More >

Competition Law Litigation in the UK

On December 4, 2019, Skadden hosted a discussion with Sir Marcus Smith QC, a Justice of the High Cou...

Read More >

[Webinar] The Dynamics of Antitrust Agency Investigations: A Second Request Update - October 14th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm ET

HSR Act-driven Second Request responses require an uncommon balance of understanding, expertise, and...

Read More >

Under the Microscope: Dissecting Errors to Evaluate RWI Damage Claims

After an M&A transaction, a buyer may discover certain misrepresentations as to the target company’...

Read More >