X
28Oct

False Alarm? The Practical Impact of AB 51, California’s New Anti-Arbitration Statute

California recently enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 51, a law that attempts to ban certain mandatory employment arbitration agreements in the state. But what is the practical impact of AB 51 in light of its possible preemption by the Federal Arbitration...
By: Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/false-alarm-the-practical-impact-of-ab-91702/

Related

An Update On Pay Gap Shareholder Proposals

For nearly five years, major U.S. corporations have been subject to intense scrutiny over their deci...

Read More >

NLRB Proposes Regulation to Prevent Students From Organizing

As we discussed in an earlier client alert, the National Labor Relations Board announced in May that...

Read More >

Actual Knowledge Means Actual Knowledge: U.S. Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split Over ERISA’s Statute of Limitations for Fiduciary Breaches

In its February 26, 2020, unanimous decision in Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sul...

Read More >

Paycheck Protection Program Update: New SBA Guidance Impacting M&A Activity

The Small Business Administration’s latest guidance tells PPP lenders under what conditions they ma...

Read More >

Just (Don’t) Do It: Oregon Supreme Court Warns Against Cat’s Paw Retaliation

The Oregon Supreme Court just revived a whistleblower retaliation claim filed against sportswear gia...

Read More >

New York Federal Court Upholds Arbitration Agreement in Sexual Harassment Case Despite State Law Prohibition

On June 26, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Mahmoud Latif v. ...

Read More >