09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
New Jersey continued its march to becoming one of the most employee-friendly jurisdictions in the co...
Read More >
This brief guide provides updates on the impact of COVID-19 on merger control reviews around the wor...
Read More >
Tastes may differ, but there can be no dispute that the music video for “November Rain,” the ultim...
Read More >
Increased awareness of safety concerns related to foreign direct investments has prompted a ramp-up ...
Read More >
If you thought employers were overburdened with wage penalties in California, you were wrong. Well,...
Read More >
Market Trends: What You Need to Know - Based on the American Bar Association's Private Target Merge...
Read More >