09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
Effective January 1, 2020, the earnings threshold for an employee to qualify as an exempt executive,...
Read More >
A new law has taken effect that makes significant changes to the rules for making contributions to a...
Read More >
It is well-known among employers that employees must be reimbursed for necessary expenditures and lo...
Read More >
In Nichols v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 924 F.3d 80 (5th Cir. 2019), the U.S. Court of Appeal...
Read More >
California Governor Gavin Newsom recently signed into law SB 142, significantly expanding employers’...
Read More >
On August 12, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued three proposed amendments to th...
Read More >