09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
A bipartisan bill aimed at generally banning non-compete agreements across the country has been intr...
Read More >
In the recent decision Newton v. Morgantown Machine & Hydraulics, the Supreme Court of Appeals of We...
Read More >
Ontario: Bill 124, for a Sustainable Public Sector for Future Generations, Enacted - New Legislatio...
Read More >
An Illinois appellate court decision that recently overturned an employer’s effort to protect again...
Read More >
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 created a lucrative new tax incentive for certain business owners:...
Read More >
Tech has been transformed in the last decade. Does value invested in the cloud, big data and algorit...
Read More >