09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always ...
Read More >
We posted our first installment of the National P3 Update, focusing on higher education and social i...
Read More >
Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! Today, we have ex-BigLaw recruiter Sadie Jones back ...
Read More >
The Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board (“TAPCB”) issued an October 24th Technical Secretary’s ...
Read More >
The U.S. Departments of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services have issued final regulat...
Read More >
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) provided useful clarity on when an act by an employee is done “...
Read More >