09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
Earlier this year, the two federal antitrust agencies—the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the De...
Read More >
The holiday season is fast approaching. What should be a joyful time filled with family, friends and...
Read More >
Join Partners Anne Domozick and Forbes Thompson to gain insights on the lessons learned when negotia...
Read More >
In some transactions, such as those involving the acquisition of a business, the deal may be documen...
Read More >
Another mid-year reminder: California hotels and motels must train all employees on human trafficki...
Read More >
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has finalized revisions to the regulations governing hardship dis...
Read More >