09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
Although there is no standard set of measures that a company can implement to guarantee that it will...
Read More >
While life sciences M&A activity soared to a new high in 2019, the uncertainty surrounding the pande...
Read More >
Since it was established in 2014, a United Nations Inter-Governmental Working Group (“IGWG”) has m...
Read More >
Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance relat...
Read More >
The Supreme Court’s October 2018-2019 term began with the highly politicized confirmation of Justic...
Read More >
The European Commission on March 25 issued guidelines addressed to its member states outlining an EU...
Read More >