09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
The legal rules applicable to the “gig” economy continue to evolve. In the past year, there have b...
Read More >
The US agencies continue to be aggressive and have blocked transactions or required significant reme...
Read More >
It has been nearly three months since Minnesota’s Wage Theft Statute took effect, and the initial c...
Read More >
GDPR requires businesses to be transparent, fair, and proportionate in how they collect process and ...
Read More >
Policing hospital mergers has become a top enforcement priority among federal antitrust enforcers. I...
Read More >
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision confirms that, unlike in statutory mergers, the attorne...
Read More >