X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

Service Charges vs. Gratuities And Why It Matters

Attention hospitality employers. Is that charge you add to a guest check a service charge (typicall...

Read More >

Take That, Employers! California is Done (for Now) with this Year’s Legislative Thrashing

Here’s a comprehensive list of the new employment-related statutes enacted and signed into law in t...

Read More >

Ontario, Canada: When an Employment Contract Is Frustrated Due to the Employee’s Permanent Disability, the Employer’s Duty to Accommodate Ends

Employers in Ontario will likely welcome the decision in Katz et al. v. Clarke, 2019 ONSC 2188 (Divi...

Read More >

Alabama Passes State Equal Pay Act

On June 11, 2019, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed into law the Clark-Figures Equal Pay Act (the “A...

Read More >

California Governor Signs Legislation Outlawing Mandatory Arbitration Agreements with Employees

As employers with operations in California had feared, Governor Gavin Newsom has signed AB 51, which...

Read More >

Suit Challenging Interpretation of Tentative Map Conditions Was Not Time-Barred

Nicholas Honchariw’s battles with the County of Stanislaus over his 9-lot subdivision have now resu...

Read More >