X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

California Supreme Court Provides Valuable Blueprint For Your Arbitration Agreement Strategy

The California Supreme Court recently handed down an intriguing decision which casts doubt on – and...

Read More >

EPA Final Rule may keep projects at existing major sources from triggering stringent pre-construction permitting requirements

On October 22, 2020, the EPA issued a long-awaited final rule that amends and clarifies the preconst...

Read More >

NLRB Upholds Employer’s Bargaining And Demotions Post-Impasse As Lawful

In its January 31, 2020 decision in Phillips 66, 369 NLRB No. 13 (January 31, 2020) the Board revers...

Read More >

Compensation and Benefits Insights – August 2019

Multiple Employer Plans: Proposed IRS Regulations Eliminate the “One Bad Apple” Rule - A multipl...

Read More >

Foreign direct investment reviews 2020: A global perspective - India

Government approval is required for all foreign investments from countries sharing a land border wit...

Read More >

New FLSA Rule Raises Minimum Salary Thresholds for Exemption from Overtime Pay

The U.S. Department of Labor (the “DOL”) has just released, after much anticipation, final updates...

Read More >