06Dec
“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By:
Littler
Related
September 30, 2019 marks the newly announced deadline for employers who submit annual EEO-1 reports ...
Read More >
In the simplest case for federal preemption, federal law prohibits conduct that a state tort duty wo...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In our fourth installment on the presidential candidates’ stances on future of w...
Read More >
Massage Therapy Company Fired Employee Because She Was Pregnant, Federal Agency Charged - ORLANDO,...
Read More >
On August 21, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in Faludi v. U...
Read More >
California passed a sweeping new privacy law that will impact many businesses. The California Consum...
Read More >