X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

Republic of Labour Law – Irish HR Updates

Welcome to our inaugural edition of the Republic of Labour Law, a monthly newsletter in which we dis...

Read More >

Chancery Court Confirms a Stockholder May Contractually Waive Appraisal Rights

Manti Holdings, LLC v. Authentix Acquisition Co., Inc., C.A. No. 2017-0887 SG (Del. Ch. Aug 14, 2019...

Read More >

“WARN”ing to New Jersey Employers: NJ WARN Act Dramatically Expanded

Last week, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed an amendment to the New Jersey WARN Act, dramatica...

Read More >

It’s time to mediate a case with an ex-employee. Now what?

Today’s blog will review a scenario that is a common occurrence for many practicing employment lawy...

Read More >

[Video] Transaction Costs Webinar Series- Part Two: The Treatment of Transaction Costs

Pepper Hamilton has launched a three-part webinar series on transaction costs. This series addresses...

Read More >

NLRB Makes ‘Unilateral’ Less Of A Dirty Word

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) requires employers with a unionized workforce to bargain in ...

Read More >