X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

Texas Appellate Court Upholds Contractor’s Arbitration Clause

Businesses often utilize arbitration clauses in their contracts to avoid the alleged “uncertainty”...

Read More >

What Plan Sponsors and IRA Owners Need to Know About the SECURE Act

On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed into law H.R. 1865, the Further Consolidated Appropriat...

Read More >

The Chronicle: American Adult-Use Marijuana Laws

Adult-use marijuana has arrived in America. Eleven states and the District of Columbia have legalize...

Read More >

Legalized Marijuana in Illinois: The Basics for Employers

On June 25, 2019, Governor Jay B. Pritzker signed the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act (HR1438) (“Ca...

Read More >

California Legislature Extends Statute of Limitations for Fair Employment and Housing Act Claims to Three Years

On October 10, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 9 into law, extending the statute of limitation...

Read More >

SEC Updates Rules for Financial Statements for M&A

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 21, 2020, adopted amendments to Regulation S-X (R...

Read More >