06Dec
“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By:
Littler
Related
On July 22, 2019, the Ninth Circuit withdrew its recent decision applying the landmark employee/inde...
Read More >
Size-of-transaction threshold under Hart-Scott-Rodino Act will increase to $94 million. On February...
Read More >
Since 1991, California employers with 10 employees or more have been required to develop written wor...
Read More >
On June 24, 2019, the Department of Labor made public its long-awaited proposed rule establishing a ...
Read More >
Just as quickly as the U.S. Department of Commerce announced the parameters of prohibitions on trans...
Read More >
The state of California recently passed legislation that amends the definition of race under the Cal...
Read More >