X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

Legislative Update 2020: Sexual Harassment Training for Janitorial and Construction Workers

Last in our series of California’s legislative updates is a summary of bills aimed at sexual harass...

Read More >

ADA Litigation Lessons Surfaced From a Zamboni Machine

Employers, you see this movie all too often. You tolerate, and then ultimately discharge, a poor-per...

Read More >

Failure to Include A No-Build Analysis in Project Description Does Not Violate CEQA

In the belatedly-published Environmental Council of Sacramento, et al. v. County of Sacramento (Cord...

Read More >

Mexico: New Provisions Give Domestic Workers Access to Social Security and Health Care Benefits

On March 29, 2019, Mexico’s government launched the Pilot Program to Register Domestic Workers to t...

Read More >

OFCCP Issues Technical Assistance Guide for Educational Institutions and Trains its Sights on the Tenure Selection Process

Maintaining its recent focus on compliance issues particular to educational institutions, OFCCP publ...

Read More >

Single Contractor Not Precluded from Providing Both Design and Construction Services

Case Provides Valuable Guidance for Public Agencies Wanting One Contractor for Two Phases - A contr...

Read More >