X
21Oct

Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop

K&L Gates LLP | | Return|
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By: K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/

Related

A Return to Common Sense in Federal Labor Law

Through a series of decisions issued in late 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “...

Read More >

Products in a New Dimension: Manufacturing Considerations for 3D-Printed Products

Since its advent more than 30 years ago, the 3D printing market has grown, and will continue to expa...

Read More >

COVID-19: Delays May Affect Construction Project Schedules and Budgets

On March 16, Boston mayor Martin Walsh issued an order halting all construction projects in the city...

Read More >

Mexico Resumes Economic Activities: Additional Guidance as Operations Restart

As expected, the transportation manufacturing industry (which includes automotive and aerospace), al...

Read More >

Circuit Court Once Again Reins in NLRB Over Jurisdiction

This week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided the matter of Duqu...

Read More >

Shopping Subcontractors After Using Bid That Resulted In Contract Award

Can contractors “shop” bids after obtaining and using them to obtain contract awards?  Generally s...

Read More >