X
21Oct

Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop

K&L Gates LLP | | Return|
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By: K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/

Related

Waste, fraud, and abuse? For health insurers, fat profits matter more

What happens when a whistle blower provides detailed information about a burly Texan — with convict...

Read More >

U.S. Supreme Court Asked To Review California’s Perceived Hostility To Arbitration Agreements

Not surprisingly, OTO, LLC, the employer in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, 8 Cal. 5th 111 (2019), on January 13...

Read More >

COVID-19 Impacts on the Copyright Office: What Does It Mean for Mergers and Acquisitions?

Like much of the federal government, the U.S. Copyright Office (the “Office”) is adjusting its pra...

Read More >

Better together – How far can competitors go under UK competition law in cooperating to deal with the challenges of the COVID-19 crisis?

Competition/antitrust laws generally require rival firms to operate on the market independently of e...

Read More >

2021 HSR Thresholds Decreasing

In a direction consistent with 2020, the filing thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Impro...

Read More >

School Mitigation Fees May Validly be Imposed on Adult-Only Seasonal Farmworker Housing

When imposing a school impact fee on residential development, a district need not separately analyze...

Read More >