X
21Oct

Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop

K&L Gates LLP | | Return|
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By: K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/

Related

Frequently asked questions on the impact of COVID-19 on NEC4 contracts

Contractors in the UK construction industry have been reviewing their contracts to consider what pro...

Read More >

[Video] 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program-Day 28 | Post-acquisition integration plan

Your company has just made its largest acquisition ever and your CEO says they want you to have a co...

Read More >

EEOC Sues McDonald’s Franchise For Religious Discrimination

Longwood Restaurant Failed to Hire Applicant Because of His Beard, Federal Agency Charges in Lawsuit...

Read More >

[Video] Compliance Man Chooses the Target - Episode 5: Compliance Risks in Russia

Welcome to Episode 5 of Compliance Man Chooses the Target with Tim Khasanov-Batirov. My goal is to h...

Read More >

Between Absolute and Amorphous: The Draft Guidance On Vertical Mergers: Commentary On The Draft 2020 Guidelines

Businesses at different levels in the supply chain of a product choose to merge (“vertical mergers,...

Read More >

The SECURE Act Ends The Stretch IRA

On December 19, President Trump signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (“...

Read More >