X
21Oct

Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop

K&L Gates LLP | | Return|
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By: K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/

Related

Third Circuit Opinion Involving Uber Only Adds More Questions to the Dispute Over the Scope of the FAA Section 1 Residual Clause

Recent decisions have cast doubt on the enforcement of arbitration clauses in the context of the int...

Read More >

2019 Developments and Trends in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) & Global Anti-Corruption Efforts, Part 3 of 3

Previously we introduced you to the FCPA and provided updates about the positive international trend...

Read More >

The perils and promise of a voluntary notification regime: Learning points from the Uber-Grab transaction

Merger control is one of the key pillars in Singapore’s antitrust framework. Its main objective is ...

Read More >

SEC Proposes New Human Capital Disclosure Requirements: A Reasonable Step or a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?

Seyfarth Synopsis: On August 23, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), in a r...

Read More >

Beltway Buzz - December 2019 #3

This week, Congress wrapped a bow on 2019 with some significant legislative accomplishments. For exa...

Read More >