X
21Oct

Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop

K&L Gates LLP | | Return|
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By: K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/

Related

NLRB Final Election Rule Signals More Balanced and Efficient Elections Ahead

On December 13, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued a new Final Rule amendin...

Read More >

Massachusetts Paid Family and Medical Leave: Update on 1099-MISC Workers and State-Provided Training

The deadlines for notice to employees and contribution withholdings required by the Massachusetts Pa...

Read More >

Improvement needed to meet gender targets

Back in 2016, the government commissioned the Hampton-Alexander Review to address gender inequality ...

Read More >

Supreme Court Turns Down Appeal on the Americans with Disabilities Act's Applicability to Websites, Potentially Leaving Businesses Open to Suit

On October 7, 2019, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Domino's Pizza (Domino's) concerning w...

Read More >

Changes To Buy American Policies

Strengthening Buy American statutes have been a rare area of bipartisan agreement in the current fra...

Read More >

Are You Really Protected From Wage-and-Hour Successor Liability in an Asset Purchase?

Seyfarth Synopsis: In acquiring a company, there is often a tendency to think an asset purchase (as ...

Read More >