X
21Oct

Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop

K&L Gates LLP | | Return|
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By: K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/

Related

Fifth Circuit Says EEOC Cannot Use 2012 Criminal Background History Guidance — What Does This Mean?

On August 6, 2019, in State of Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. Court of A...

Read More >

M&A is top of mind: Will dealmakers actually double down in a downturn?

In a world roiled by activism, geopolitical uncertainty and data risk, dealmakers are eager to lean ...

Read More >

Poison Pill Deep Dive Series: Qualifying Offer

The sixth of a six-part series examining six specific and evolving rights plan provisions. As discu...

Read More >

Mechanic’s Liens For Design Professionals: A Powerful Payment Collection Tool

In these unprecedented times, every bit of revenue is critical to the continued operation of nearly ...

Read More >

[Video] Impacts of Emerging Regulations: Part 1 – The HTS Landscape

In this five-part podcast series, sponsored by Assent Compliance Inc. (Assent), I explore market imp...

Read More >

Hotlines & Headlines: How Your Whistleblower Hotline Usage Correlates with Media Exposure

About this time last year, research from George Washington University and University of Utah found a...

Read More >