21Oct
Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By:
K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/
Related
Recent decisions have cast doubt on the enforcement of arbitration clauses in the context of the int...
Read More >
Previously we introduced you to the FCPA and provided updates about the positive international trend...
Read More >
Merger control is one of the key pillars in Singapore’s antitrust framework. Its main objective is ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: On August 23, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), in a r...
Read More >
With 169 special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) initial public offerings (IPOs) and 102 SPAC mer...
Read More >
This week, Congress wrapped a bow on 2019 with some significant legislative accomplishments. For exa...
Read More >