X
21Oct

Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop

K&L Gates LLP | | Return|
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By: K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/

Related

The Coronavirus Outbreak’s Impact on International Employers

As the world responds to the accelerating 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak originating in...

Read More >

It’s legal until it’s not

Shelf space payments where mutual fund companies pay to get access on a particular 401(k) custodial ...

Read More >

The Latest: Changes Coming to Revenue Reporting for HSR Filings

What Happened: • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with the Antitrust Division of the Depa...

Read More >

Dear YouDig? Love Stinks

Dear YouDig?, We are in the middle of a massive addition to our warehouse. The value is high seven ...

Read More >

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: California Federal Court Rules Claim Denial was Unequivocal

In Daneman v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42881 (C.D. Cal. March 11, 2019),...

Read More >

SBA Clarifies Rules Regarding PPP Loans And Changes Of Ownership

In a recently issued procedural notice, the Small Business Association (“SBA”) addressed a lingeri...

Read More >