X
21Oct

Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop

K&L Gates LLP | | Return|
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By: K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/

Related

CARES Act Questions for the Real Estate and Construction Industry - Update #2

Congress recently passed the economic stimulus package referred to as the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, a...

Read More >

Loss of Productivity in Construction Contracts: Measured Mile – Just Another Global Claim?

Productivity loss claims are one of the biggest issues in construction arbitration and litigation. W...

Read More >

Brexit: No-Deal Immigration Arrangements for EU Citizens

The following alert is directed to organizations with a presence in the UK or who anticipate the nee...

Read More >

First Circuit Finds That Funds Were Not Liable for Portfolio Company’s Pension Fund Withdrawal Liability

On November 22, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that two separat...

Read More >

Employer’s Swift Decisive Action Helps Defeat Hostile Work Environment Claim

On October 24, 2019, Judge Cathy Seibel of the Southern District of New York issued her ruling grant...

Read More >

Recent Trends in Officer Liability

More than a decade ago in the seminal case Gantler v. Stephens, the Delaware Supreme Court clarified...

Read More >