21Oct
Termination Fee is Not Exclusive Remedy for Breach of No-Shop
On September 9, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that Genuine Parts Company (“GPC”) adequately pled facts that supported a pleading stage inference that Essendant Inc. breached its merger agreement with GPC by terminating the agreement to...
By:
K&L Gates LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/termination-fee-is-not-exclusive-remedy-36674/
Related
What happens when a whistle blower provides detailed information about a burly Texan — with convict...
Read More >
Not surprisingly, OTO, LLC, the employer in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, 8 Cal. 5th 111 (2019), on January 13...
Read More >
Like much of the federal government, the U.S. Copyright Office (the “Office”) is adjusting its pra...
Read More >
Competition/antitrust laws generally require rival firms to operate on the market independently of e...
Read More >
In a direction consistent with 2020, the filing thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Impro...
Read More >
When imposing a school impact fee on residential development, a district need not separately analyze...
Read More >