07Oct
District of Rhode Island Dismisses In-House Attorney’s SOX Whistleblower Claim for Lack of Protected Activity
On July 19, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island granted an employer’s motion to dismiss a SOX whistleblower claim, holding that the Plaintiff—an in-house attorney—failed to allege sufficient facts to show he had an...
By:
Proskauer - Whistleblowing & Retaliation
Related
Every CEQA analysis begins with the threshold question of whether the activity is a “project” as d...
Read More >
In Taylor v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, the Washington Supreme Court recently hel...
Read More >
On January 6, 2020, the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJ DOL” or “De...
Read More >
In Ephrat et al v medCPU, Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery considered whether a separation agree...
Read More >
On March 31, 2020, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a new rule modifying election pr...
Read More >
The Miller Act protects subcontractors from nonpayment on federal projects by requiring prime contra...
Read More >