30Jan
Mere Change?—“F” Reorganization Qualifies in Spite of Change in Plan
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.” Perhaps that quote is a tad strong to apply generally to corporate reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Plans, after all, are very important—if not essential—in the context of corporate reorganizations. However, based on a recent Private Letter Ruling, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) noted that the “plan of reorganization” requirement for an “F”...
By:
Freeman Law
Related
Q: Are non-competes enforceable in Iowa? A: Yes, but with a whole lot of caveats. Enforceability d...
Read More >
Following passage and signature into law of California Assembly Bill 5 (“AB-5”), retailers should ...
Read More >
On June 18, 2019, in Marchand v. Barnhill, the Delaware Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Chie...
Read More >
Perhaps the most frequently violated provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act is that law’s requir...
Read More >
Given the variety of problems that can arise on a construction project, from defects to delays, it’...
Read More >
Last week, HHS released new and modified existing Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding paymen...
Read More >