30Jan
Mere Change?—“F” Reorganization Qualifies in Spite of Change in Plan
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.” Perhaps that quote is a tad strong to apply generally to corporate reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Plans, after all, are very important—if not essential—in the context of corporate reorganizations. However, based on a recent Private Letter Ruling, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) noted that the “plan of reorganization” requirement for an “F”...
By:
Freeman Law
Related
In the rapidly growing multi-billion dollar cannabis industry, new developments frequently occur in ...
Read More >
The Equal Pay Act allows employees to bring claims of pay discrimination based on gender by alleging...
Read More >
In Kim v. Reins International California, Inc. 18 Cal.App.5th 1052 (2017), the California Court of A...
Read More >
Railroad Company Refuses to Allow Employee Who Once Had Brain Tumor to Return to Work as Custodian, ...
Read More >
We recently reported on a new law in the Netherlands that sets different unemployment insurance cont...
Read More >
The Department of Labor (“DOL”) has proposed a new safe harbor to allow employers to furnish infor...
Read More >