24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
Many small or solo franchisees, subsidiaries, and affiliates of larger businesses may think the Cali...
Read More >
Administrators of Multiple Employer Plans (“MEPs”)–in which employers from different controlled ...
Read More >
Sorry to disappoint you Superman fans but that’s not your favorite superhero in the sky – it’s an...
Read More >
Von Kaenel v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, No. 18-2850 (8th Cir. 2019) The question whether an individu...
Read More >
As reported in prior blogs, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), a leading proxy advis...
Read More >
On June 10, Governor Abbott signed House Bill 2569 (the “Bill”), relating to condominium unit boun...
Read More >