24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
When one employer purchases the assets of another and intends to employ some or all of the seller’s...
Read More >
On April 8, 2020, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed Executive Order No. 122, requiring the clos...
Read More >
On January 22, 2021, the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy has published the a...
Read More >
This week, a California Court of Appeal concluded in a class action case that the California Supreme...
Read More >
Several COVID-19-related mergers and acquisitions (M&A) complaints have been filed with the Delaware...
Read More >
Recently, we have addressed the evolving regulatory landscape for per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substanc...
Read More >