24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
On January 21, 2020, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released guidance for tax-exempt organizatio...
Read More >
On 14 January 2021, German Parliament passed a comprehensive reform of the German Act against Restra...
Read More >
In the summer of 2019, I wrote a short blog on the death of the PCORI fee — Ding, Dong, the PCORI F...
Read More >
In 2017 and 2018, Illinois lawmakers tried twice to close the gender pay gap by prohibiting employer...
Read More >
Leading Retailer Failed to Reasonably Accommodate Deaf Employees Federal Agency Charged - WASHINGT...
Read More >
The OZ Digest is a regular update from the Polsinelli Opportunity Zones team. Our goal is to share e...
Read More >