24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. Boeing Board calls for more safety changes at comp...
Read More >
On January 10, 2020, Colorado Representative Jovan Melton (D) introduced House Bill 20-1089, which p...
Read More >
Welcome to #WorkforceWednesday. This weekly newsletter provides you with a cost-free, convenient way...
Read More >
It's easier to lose your job if your replacement is a robot. In an interesting bit of industrial ps...
Read More >
While discussing work assignments with his supervisor, an employee uses abusive and profane language...
Read More >
Am 29. November 2019 hat Bundeswirtschaftsminister Peter Altmaier mit seiner überabeiteten „Industr...
Read More >