24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
In the Lacour v. Construction D.M. Turcotte TRO inc. decision delivered in June 2019, the Court of A...
Read More >
2020 has been a year of two very distinct halves but signs of recovery give grounds for optimism.......
Read More >
On January 10, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade C...
Read More >
The City of Oakland spent the last four years developing the Downtown Oakland Specific Plan to addre...
Read More >
In today’s business climate, work always seems to be on the mind. But should it be? According to th...
Read More >
A new Virginia statute limits employers’ use of nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements with r...
Read More >