24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
With the number of reported cases of coronavirus (COVID-19) increasing, the governors of Pennsylvani...
Read More >
A bifurcated benefit option allows participants to receive a portion of their benefit as a lump sum ...
Read More >
Like many other states, Washington recently adopted legislation seemingly preventing the arbitration...
Read More >
EU COMPETITION LAW AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - Artificial Intelligence (AI) and big data are pla...
Read More >
In Simpson v. Temple University, et al., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsyl...
Read More >
The Department of Labor’s Veterans Employment and Training Services (“VETS”) issued a new fact sh...
Read More >