24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
On July 18, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted a defenda...
Read More >
Years in the making, the first global report on the Environmental Rule of Law (ERL) was issued by th...
Read More >
In April 2018, the Ninth Circuit held that employers cannot consider pre-employment salary history, ...
Read More >
In 2015, Congress passed a law called the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improveme...
Read More >
On March 18, 2020, the City of Cambridge announced a Temporary Emergency Construction Moratorium “M...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board recently released a Decision and Order finding that a financial s...
Read More >