24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) closed 2019 with several decisions and rule changes that o...
Read More >
In this episode of Phorensically Speaking, Jonathan Marks looks at corporate governance approaches t...
Read More >
Shelf space payments where mutual fund companies pay to get access on a particular 401(k) custodial ...
Read More >
The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) issued a July 24th news r...
Read More >
The Internal Revenue Service has extended the due date for providing the 2019 Form 1095-C (applicabl...
Read More >
The long-awaited Facebook antitrust bomb dropped on Wednesday, with the FTC and attorneys general fr...
Read More >