24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
On January 10, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice Antitrust Division...
Read More >
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed AB 5, and the new law will take effect January 1, 2020. ...
Read More >
By almost every measure, union membership rates continued its steady decline in 2019, according to t...
Read More >
Last week, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer formally announced her intent to increase the white co...
Read More >
At the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) dec...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) has settled a long-brewing controversy ov...
Read More >