24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
Lately, products containing CBD (from beer to skin cream to oils that can be diffused and vaped) see...
Read More >
The wait is over. Whispers of mega-deals have matured into agenda items for boards of many larger Eu...
Read More >
As universally expected, the Fed’s Open Market Committee delivered its third interest rate cut of 2...
Read More >
In the context of the practice of medicine, we are all very familiar with the Latin phrase primum es...
Read More >
While discussing work assignments with his supervisor, an employee uses abusive and profane language...
Read More >
Joint Employers Fostered Harassment of Workers Based on Race, National Origin and Sex, Fired Employe...
Read More >