24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
As companies increasingly look to artificial intelligence (“AI”) solutions to streamline their bus...
Read More >
While initially disappointing, the US$108.8 billion in total global PE transaction value in Q3 repre...
Read More >
The U.S. Court of Appeals in the Seventh Circuit has recently decided a case involving an extremely ...
Read More >
The Legislature approved in first debate, by the unanimous vote of the 52 representatives present at...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In our third installment in where the potential Presidential candidates stand on ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) recently announced that drugs that incl...
Read More >