24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
On August 26, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court invalidated a California employee’s customer and em...
Read More >
Despite political and economic uncertainties, markets and deal activity were resilient in 2019, and ...
Read More >
This month’s Friday Five addresses a myriad of issues including whether returning to work post-inju...
Read More >
The recent amendment to HIV Law number 7771, includes amendments to some articles of the Labor Code....
Read More >
As we previously reported this past summer, the New York State Senate and Assembly passed Senate Bil...
Read More >
As not just a new year but a new decade begins, we know from the closing days of 2019 that the Natio...
Read More >