24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
In this episode of the FCPA Compliance Report, I visit Justin Muscolino, Head of North American Comp...
Read More >
In today’s show, host Tom Fox speaks with Shaina Weisinger of Repurpose House, a company that repur...
Read More >
Under a California law that took effect on January 1, 2020, employers will have to provide extra not...
Read More >
COVID-19 has had a major impact on all aspects of our daily lives, including construction and projec...
Read More >
Colorado has been making headlines with several noteworthy new laws and regulations. This Lightbulb ...
Read More >
During Ward and Smith’s recent virtual "Construction Conference," six of my partners and I covered ...
Read More >