24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
Thomaston Acquisition, LLC v. Piedmont Construction Group, Inc., No. S19Q0249, 2019 BL 202176 (Ga. J...
Read More >
If your employee sues you for discrimination, they don’t get to look at how the decision-makers tre...
Read More >
The Employee Benefits Practice is pleased to present the Employee Benefits Developments Newsletter f...
Read More >
Whistleblower issues are in the news, mainly because a U.S. intelligence officer recently filed a co...
Read More >
Construction disputes (as with any matters in litigation) rarely make it to trial. Matters typically...
Read More >
On September 3, the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court’s remand of a putative class action, ho...
Read More >