24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
Another busy session week has come to an end, and the legislature won’t reconvene for voting sessio...
Read More >
On July 11, 2019, Governor Sununu signed S.B. 197 into law. S.B. 197 prohibits an employer from requ...
Read More >
In this report, we set out the key real estate developments in the US during the period of disruptio...
Read More >
These updates are designed to highlight selected important M&A, corporate and commercial court decis...
Read More >
Join the HUBZone Council as They Celebrate Their 20th Anniversary - On January 17, 2020, the HUBZo...
Read More >
Consumer Protection- When “Free” Trials Come With Strings Attached: Attorneys General Ask FTC to ...
Read More >