24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
In the wake of the new minimum wage law passed earlier this month, eight immigrant workers have file...
Read More >
ACEEE highlights 10 building energy performance standards to help meet climate goals - Bullet Util...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed summary judgment in favor of...
Read More >
You expect your insurance carrier to provide coverage when a claim is made against your company. How...
Read More >
On September 18, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), which adds Section ...
Read More >
There are a few surprises in the enforcement and litigation statistics for FY 2019 released by the E...
Read More >