24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
The impending "expiration" of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) clearance on the most rece...
Read More >
Recap of some of the most well-read Construction Law publications on JD Supra during 2020....By: Bea...
Read More >
The fourth of a six-part series examining six specific and evolving rights plan provisions. As disc...
Read More >
In Western Standard, LLC, v. SourceHOV Holdings, Inc. and Pangea Acquisitions, Inc., C.A. No. 2018-0...
Read More >
The COVID-19 pandemic hit Chinese M&A hard in Q1, but the second quarter has already witnessed a rem...
Read More >
On September 12, 2019, the California Supreme Court in ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court (Lawson) held that...
Read More >