24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
On December 2, 2020, FERC clarified that when an entity with passive equity holdings in a company la...
Read More >
On July 3, 2020, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“S...
Read More >
..On 23 July 2020, the French Competition Authority (Authority) published new merger control guideli...
Read More >
On this episode of Williams Mullen's Benefits Companion, Brydon DeWitt reviews the final health reim...
Read More >
Last week, the Antitrust Division (Division) of the U.S. Department of Justice (Department or DOJ) i...
Read More >
Employing foreign nationals in this uncertain and ever-changing immigration climate can be daunting....
Read More >