24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
This fall the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled against a subcontractor who failed to file an affidavit...
Read More >
With coronavirus interrupting the construction industry, Akerman attorneys offer guidance on how to ...
Read More >
On July 7, 2019, the U.S. women’s soccer team won its second consecutive World Cup championship and...
Read More >
The calculation of holiday pay has been the subject of a number of cases over recent weeks. There ar...
Read More >
The wait is over. Earlier today, June 18, 2019 (and earlier than the July 1, 2019 due date), the Dep...
Read More >
On July 10, 2019, the Japan Fair Trade Commission ("JFTC")'s research center, Competition Policy Res...
Read More >