24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
In Skanska USA Building Inc v MAP Mechanical Contractors, Inc, (Michigan Supreme Court, Docket Nos. ...
Read More >
Employers seeking to employ H-1B workers must register with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Ser...
Read More >
In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., t...
Read More >
On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed into law the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement ...
Read More >
Wearable fitness products company Fitbit Inc. announced Friday it entered a definitive agreement to ...
Read More >
Welcome to your weekly update from the Allen & Overy Pensions team, bringing you up to speed on the ...
Read More >