24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
In Chester County Employees’ Retirement Fund v. KCG Holdings, Inc. et al the Delaware Court of Chan...
Read More >
An “earnout” is a deal mechanism used in a merger and acquisition transaction (“M&A Transaction”...
Read More >
New York City is considering proposed legislation that would regulate the use of artificial intellig...
Read More >
In a decision of interest to private equity investors, the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Court”...
Read More >
Here’s to hoping all our readers have a great New Year’s, but do not forget that the Department of...
Read More >
UK Case Developments - IR35 – no mutuality of obligation to create a contract of employment - R...
Read More >