24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
In 2019, we saw significant activity in state legislatures passing employment-related laws in areas ...
Read More >
Opportunity Zone (or “OZ”) investment was hailed in 2018 and 2019 as the hottest and most innovati...
Read More >
On August 14, 2019, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2019-19, providing guidance to both tax-qualified ...
Read More >
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entit...
Read More >
The United Kingdom Supreme Court in Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb has now r...
Read More >
Effective at 12:01 a.m., March 17, 2020, six Bay Area counties plus Santa Cruz have ordered individu...
Read More >