24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
As we previously reported, the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) has been consideri...
Read More >
The Employee Benefits Practice is pleased to present the Employee Benefits Developments Newsletter f...
Read More >
On June 19, 2019, the New York State Assembly and Senate passed an omnibus bill (A08421/S06577) prop...
Read More >
The Third Circuit recently opened the door to exempting Uber drivers from the Federal Arbitration Ac...
Read More >
Dear YouDig? We are a commercial design builder. We strive for greatness in all of our work. Even s...
Read More >
The Internal Revenue Service on September 23 finalized proposed regulations relating to hardship dis...
Read More >