24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced its annual adjustment for notification thresholds f...
Read More >
The UK's departure from the EU on 31 January has initiated an 11 month transition period, during whi...
Read More >
Eleven years after its portfolio company’s bankruptcy triggered a multiemployer pension plan’s dem...
Read More >
Increased awareness of safety concerns related to foreign direct investments has prompted a ramp-up ...
Read More >
Mintz, an Am Law 100 firm, and Mergermarket, a company providing intelligence, data, and analysis on...
Read More >
Under Section 413(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), ERISA’s th...
Read More >