24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
On August 14, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued its first Opinion Procedure Release ...
Read More >
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law a major set of restrictions on the actions Cali...
Read More >
As we approach the holiday season, immigration practitioners, interested employers, and foreign nati...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is considering a rulemaking to address the use of non-compete pro...
Read More >
“This isn’t what I expected.” I hear that comment frequently from people that do not often partic...
Read More >
The area of prevailing wage law, construction wage-hour law, is a niche within a niche and a very co...
Read More >