24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
For law bloggers, if there’s one thing more satisfying than writing about an important new court de...
Read More >
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS LAW - This Project Is Behind Schedule - What Is a Contractor to Do? - Const...
Read More >
In communications with other plan providers, clients, and potential clients, you have to be clear. T...
Read More >
On July 17, 2019, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2019-45 to expand the types of p...
Read More >
“Employer securities” in retirement plans have been the source of a significant amount of litigati...
Read More >
Categories: Employment, Article I often get asked – what is the best way to terminate an employee? ...
Read More >