24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
A joint Hogan Lovells & GTDT publication on M&A Litigation in France. Across common law and code la...
Read More >
Investments in private companies by way of share purchases from existing shareholders (secondary tra...
Read More >
A Third Circuit appeals panel upheld the lower court ruling in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Presi...
Read More >
Everything Sucks! is a Netflix comedy series set in the mid-1990s at Boring High School. The show fo...
Read More >
California is set to become the only state to outlaw predispute mandatory arbitration of statutory e...
Read More >
In response to COVID-19-related disruption, the Construction Leadership Council (CLC) is promoting t...
Read More >