24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
When railroad crossing lights flash and whistles blare, everyone knows to stop, look, and listen. Th...
Read More >
COVID-19 has created unparalleled uncertainty for nearly all businesses since companies are unable t...
Read More >
The recent decision in Dyer v. Ventra Sandusky, LLC, issued by the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appea...
Read More >
With the passage of AB 51, which we discussed in yesterday’s post, it’s understandable for employe...
Read More >
Introduction: The PRO Act Overall - Early last week, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the ...
Read More >
On September 3, 2020, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (DOJ) updated its 2004 Merger Rem...
Read More >