24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
For construction employers anxious over how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)...
Read More >
Editor’s Note: The number of healthcare transactions reached a record-smashing 1,738 in 2018. Accor...
Read More >
A new Virginia statute limits employers’ use of nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements with r...
Read More >
In a market with soaring multiples, private equity buyers are increasingly on the hunt to mitigate h...
Read More >
Under Title VII, employers are vicariously liable for incidents of sexual harassment engaged in by s...
Read More >
While the California Labor Code specifies that an off-duty meal period must consist of at least 30 m...
Read More >