24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo on August 12 signed into law new legislation expanding employee pr...
Read More >
What California Cities Need to Know to Comply with SB 205 - California cities that issue business l...
Read More >
The United States Supreme Court has again granted a petition to examine standing in the context of c...
Read More >
Upending the longstanding practice of employers including no-rehire clauses in agreements resolving ...
Read More >
Section 403(b) plans must be maintained pursuant to a written plan document that meets detailed requ...
Read More >
The coronavirus outbreak has hindered many operations of the federal government, including the US re...
Read More >