24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
Die Europäische Kommission legt beihilferechtliche Eckpunkte vor - Staatliche Unterstützungsmaßnahm...
Read More >
The oil and gas industry in the United States is highly dependent upon an intricate set of agreement...
Read More >
The UK Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA") recently issued its Annual Plan for 2020/2021, whic...
Read More >
As expected, Governor J.B. Pritzker recently signed the cannabis legalization bill that was passed a...
Read More >
Because the term “consumer” is so broad in the CCPA (remember: it’s any California resident), it ...
Read More >
Last year towards the end of May, a barrage of emails and pop-ups informed online users about how co...
Read More >