24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
Last year, California enacted AB 5 imposing the so-called A-B-C test for employee status under Calif...
Read More >
The Situation: Declared a global health emergency by the World Health Organization, and with more th...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission, with the concurrence of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department ...
Read More >
Minimum wage bill heads to the Governor - On a vote of 23-6, the Senate voted on Thursday to concur...
Read More >
Welcome to the Great Women in Compliance Podcast, co-hosted by Lisa Fine and Mary Shirley. In this P...
Read More >
As of June 17, 2019, travelers from the United States may enter Brazil for periods up to 90 days wit...
Read More >