24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
The amendments aim to promote foreign direct investments for sound economic growth, while still ensu...
Read More >
The title of this post describes not an army maneuver, but the outcome of a recent lawsuit in Delawa...
Read More >
On May 21, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments to its disc...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: 2019 proved to be an active year on the paid sick leave (“PSL”) front and there...
Read More >
When picking plan providers, you must have a rational process in place to that. There must be a vari...
Read More >
Among the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) rulemaking priorities under the National Labor Re...
Read More >