24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
The UK Information Commissioner's Office announced more than £280 million of fines last week, in con...
Read More >
Adding to an already busy summer of New York state employment law developments, employers and human ...
Read More >
Have you ever wondered when Massachusetts’ 6-year statute of repose for defective design, planning ...
Read More >
In Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. RSI Holdco, LLC, C.A. No. 2018-0517-KSJM (Del. Ch. May...
Read More >
On Wednesday, an FTC Commissioner used the occasion of a routine report to Congress to send a warnin...
Read More >
Welcome to your weekly update from the Allen & Overy Pensions team, bringing you up to spee?d on the...
Read More >