24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
In the context of the practice of medicine, we are all very familiar with the Latin phrase primum es...
Read More >
In December 2020, the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) amended the small business si...
Read More >
Welcome to the newest addition to the Compliance Podcast Network, Compliance and Coronavirus. As the...
Read More >
Opportunity zones provide a powerful tool for taxpayers to defer recognizing their capital gains if ...
Read More >
On October 26, 2020, we provided an overview of the key features of Bill 37, Builders' Lien (Prompt ...
Read More >
Employee attendance problems are probably the most common reason for disciplinary action and dischar...
Read More >