24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
To close out the 2019 legislative season, Governor Gavin Newsom signed dozens of bills into law, whi...
Read More >
A Hollywood union’s recent amendments to its union rules has sparked federal antitrust lawsuits by ...
Read More >
In the past 35 years, it changed on who had to take out a required minimum distribution (RMD) from a...
Read More >
The amendments aim to promote foreign direct investments for sound economic growth, while still ensu...
Read More >
One potentially unintended consequence of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was the demise of the averag...
Read More >
On December 6, 2019, the Second Circuit issued a decision that will have a strong impact on the sett...
Read More >