24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
Summary - The European Commission (EC) has proposed far-reaching new powers to investigate and sanc...
Read More >
In Sunday’s Oscars acceptance speech for the animated short film “Hair Love,” in which an African...
Read More >
When Canada’s Cannabis Act and supporting regulations came into force on October 17, 2018, Canada b...
Read More >
-The DOJ has announced charges against four members of China’s military related to the 2017 cyberat...
Read More >
The Employee Benefits Practice is pleased to present the Employee Benefits Developments Newsletter f...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) grants employees “the right to self-organization, to form, ...
Read More >