24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
Due to a flood of requests, the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) Board of Directors reque...
Read More >
On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) announced its final rule regarding cha...
Read More >
On January 21, 2020, Governor Murphy signed Senate Bill 3170 into law, amending the Millville Dallas...
Read More >
We have previously written about how public-private partnerships ("P3s") are on the rise in the Unit...
Read More >
CFIUS has adopted a series of new amendments to its regulations that significantly expand its jurisd...
Read More >
The 1099 independent contractor model can be the ideal setup for some employers and workers. However...
Read More >