24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
We are now less than two months away from the new IR35 regime: important changes to the way companie...
Read More >
Here are five hidden risks common to many workplaces which employers should prioritise to save your ...
Read More >
Despite its request to close the pay data reporting portal, Judge Chutkan has ordered EEOC to contin...
Read More >
After an initial delay, payroll and wage withholdings to fund the Massachusetts paid family and medi...
Read More >
Members of the Baby Boom generation often remained in one job throughout their working lives. It is...
Read More >
On February 18, 2020, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reached the H-2B cap for the...
Read More >