24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
On October 3, 2019 OFCCP submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget for approval of ...
Read More >
In 2018, the Supreme Court of California turned much of the established law regarding worker classif...
Read More >
The Americans with Disabilities Act not only provides protections for disabled persons but also thos...
Read More >
Federal construction contractors are barred from discriminating in employment on the basis of race, ...
Read More >
On June 18, 2019, in a decision authored by Chief Justice Leo E. Strine Jr., the Delaware Supreme Co...
Read More >
The Ninth Circuit ruled on October 1, 2019, that McDonald’s cannot be held liable for wage and hour...
Read More >