26Oct
Risk Allocation in Merger Agreements in an Era of Increased Enforcement
Our antitrust practice is pleased to present a new report addressing the prevalence of risk-shifting provisions in merger agreements. As antitrust agencies continue to galvanize enforcement efforts, such provisions have emerged as a critical counterbalance to increased regulatory scrutiny. The firm, working with NERA Economic Consulting, examined over 700 merger agreements from 2004-2019 to construct an empirical analysis of the prevalence of efforts clauses, divestiture and litigation...
By:
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Related
Given the current impact of COVID-19 on the financial services industry, please tune in to our podca...
Read More >
People involved in mergers and acquisitions know there are risks inherent in every deal, including t...
Read More >
Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 (1918), virtual...
Read More >
In Simpson v. Temple University, et al., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsyl...
Read More >
Chinese Hosp. Ass’n v. Jacobs Eng’g Grp., Inc., 2019 BL 330340, 2 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 03, 2019) - Th...
Read More >
The US Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) Criminal Division published an update on June 1 to its Eval...
Read More >