26Oct
Risk Allocation in Merger Agreements in an Era of Increased Enforcement
Our antitrust practice is pleased to present a new report addressing the prevalence of risk-shifting provisions in merger agreements. As antitrust agencies continue to galvanize enforcement efforts, such provisions have emerged as a critical counterbalance to increased regulatory scrutiny. The firm, working with NERA Economic Consulting, examined over 700 merger agreements from 2004-2019 to construct an empirical analysis of the prevalence of efforts clauses, divestiture and litigation...
By:
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Related
FASB has issued an Invitation to Comment, or ITC, as part of FASB’s project on certain identifiabl...
Read More >
California’s AB 51, barring mandatory arbitration agreements in employment, is now facing preemptio...
Read More >
In the second round of debates between the presidential Democratic candidates held on July 30 and Ju...
Read More >
Germany’s cabinet has approved draft legislation designed to tighten the country’s foreign investm...
Read More >
In September 2019, the New Jersey Division of Rights (“DCR”) issued enforcement guidance (“Guidan...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (“Board” or “NLRB”) has announced that it is publishing propo...
Read More >