19Oct
Flag on the Play for Illegal Procedure: Necessary Parties and the Pitfalls of Nonjoinder
Failure to name a necessary party when challenging a land use determination may result in dismissal, and leave a challenger without further recourse. CPLR 1003 provides that the nonjoinder of a party who should be joined under CPLR 1001 (i.e. a person ought to be a party if he or she might be inequitably be affected by a judgment in the proceeding), is a ground for dismissal without prejudice....
By:
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Related
Under a new Nevada law, effective July 1, 2019, employers that settle certain allegations involving ...
Read More >
In 20/20 Communications, Inc. v. Crawford, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently ...
Read More >
When it comes to your health, there are certain symptoms you should look out for that could be a har...
Read More >
On September 18, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), which adds Section ...
Read More >
In recent years, we have seen an increased focus on cybersecurity due diligence in many mergers and ...
Read More >
In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode Assignment Earth which aired...
Read More >