19Oct
Flag on the Play for Illegal Procedure: Necessary Parties and the Pitfalls of Nonjoinder
Failure to name a necessary party when challenging a land use determination may result in dismissal, and leave a challenger without further recourse. CPLR 1003 provides that the nonjoinder of a party who should be joined under CPLR 1001 (i.e. a person ought to be a party if he or she might be inequitably be affected by a judgment in the proceeding), is a ground for dismissal without prejudice....
By:
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Related
A seemingly innocuous interview question is now illegal to ask job applicants in numerous jurisdicti...
Read More >
New Jersey amended its existing WARN Act, otherwise known as the Millville Dallas Airmotive Plant Jo...
Read More >
Another busy session week has come to an end, and the legislature won’t reconvene for voting sessio...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission's Premerger Notification Office (PNO) announced that, effective Monday,...
Read More >
The Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs, 2019 Guidance, makes clear that operationalization ...
Read More >
This arbitration decision may result in a "whack." For more than 30 years, the California Supreme C...
Read More >