19Oct
Flag on the Play for Illegal Procedure: Necessary Parties and the Pitfalls of Nonjoinder
Failure to name a necessary party when challenging a land use determination may result in dismissal, and leave a challenger without further recourse. CPLR 1003 provides that the nonjoinder of a party who should be joined under CPLR 1001 (i.e. a person ought to be a party if he or she might be inequitably be affected by a judgment in the proceeding), is a ground for dismissal without prejudice....
By:
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Related
Regulation Best Interest: Rollover Recommendations for Pension Plan Benefits (Rollovers Part 8) - T...
Read More >
As we say goodbye (and good riddance) to an incredibly challenging 2020, we thought it would be usef...
Read More >
In a significant victory for employers and the principles of due process, the District of Minnesota ...
Read More >
As a “home rule” state, New York’s zoning and other land use decisions are typically made at the ...
Read More >
A common challenge for employers of hourly or nonexempt employees who receive quarterly or annual no...
Read More >
We’ve been talking a lot about employment arbitration since the passage of AB 51. We’ve discussed ...
Read More >