17Sep
Chancery Rules Failure to Disclose “Intrinsic Value” Precludes Corwin Defense – But Does Not Necessarily Suggest a Breach of the Duty of Loyalty
In In re USG Corp. S’holder Litig., 2020 WL 5126671 (Del. Ch. Aug. 31, 2020), the Court of Chancery granted the director-defendants’ motions to dismiss post-closing money damages claims arising out of the sale of USG Corporation (“USG”) for less than what USG’s directors allegedly thought was its intrinsic value. Although the failure to disclose such “intrinsic value” prevented dismissal under Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings, LLC, 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015), Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III held...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court will now address the question, “Are contractual no-hire provisions w...
Read More >
On April 9, 2020, the New York State Empire State Development (ESD) updated its “Guidance for Deter...
Read More >
In This Issue. The U.S. House of Representatives voted to approve the SAFE Banking Act, which would ...
Read More >
Sunrun launches U.S. virtual power plant - Bullet Solar Industry Magazine – June 17 - Sunrun In...
Read More >
On Oct. 18, 2019, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Raytheon Co. v...
Read More >
As we have all witnessed, the COVID-19 situation remains incredibly fluid and presents unique challe...
Read More >