12Aug
Seventh Circuit: Key Takeaways from Hinterberger v. City of Indianapolis
In Hinterberger v. City of Indianapolis, the Seventh Circuit recently reminded litigants of their unyielding obligation to follow local rules. Hinterberger, --- F.3d ---, No. 19-3365, 2020 WL 3980690 (7th Cir. 2020). In that case, a real-estate developer (the “Developer”) brought eight claims, including constitutional claims, in the Southern District of Indiana against the City of Indianapolis (the “City”) and others arising from a failed development project in Indianapolis’s midtown area....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
When a plan administrator is attending to a benefit claim and thinks it is time to call in an attorn...
Read More >
While the California Labor Code specifies that an off-duty meal period must consist of at least 30 m...
Read More >
The outbreak of COVID-19 and the efforts around the globe to contain its spread have resulted in dra...
Read More >
Law No. 20.786, which is known as Dual Education and Dual Technical Training Law, was approved by th...
Read More >
More than a decade ago in the seminal case Gantler v. Stephens, the Delaware Supreme Court clarified...
Read More >
In 2019, the number of large PE transactions in Latin America increased significantly. According to ...
Read More >