12Aug
Seventh Circuit: Key Takeaways from Hinterberger v. City of Indianapolis
In Hinterberger v. City of Indianapolis, the Seventh Circuit recently reminded litigants of their unyielding obligation to follow local rules. Hinterberger, --- F.3d ---, No. 19-3365, 2020 WL 3980690 (7th Cir. 2020). In that case, a real-estate developer (the “Developer”) brought eight claims, including constitutional claims, in the Southern District of Indiana against the City of Indianapolis (the “City”) and others arising from a failed development project in Indianapolis’s midtown area....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Two federal courts have struck down the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) “Consc...
Read More >
At our recent Funds First seminar we shared some technical and market issues and updates on the Seni...
Read More >
In a case with a truly byzantine court history, Texas v. EEOC, Texas has once again prevailed in str...
Read More >
A new law was passed in Pennsylvania prohibiting employment of unauthorized employees. Starting in ...
Read More >
In the recently-passed Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act, Illinois legalized recreational marijuana ef...
Read More >
Minnesota’s wage theft law, which largely went into effect on July 1, 2019, created new documentati...
Read More >