12Aug
Seventh Circuit: Key Takeaways from Hinterberger v. City of Indianapolis
In Hinterberger v. City of Indianapolis, the Seventh Circuit recently reminded litigants of their unyielding obligation to follow local rules. Hinterberger, --- F.3d ---, No. 19-3365, 2020 WL 3980690 (7th Cir. 2020). In that case, a real-estate developer (the “Developer”) brought eight claims, including constitutional claims, in the Southern District of Indiana against the City of Indianapolis (the “City”) and others arising from a failed development project in Indianapolis’s midtown area....
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
In Amanda Frlekin v. Apple Inc., No. S243805 (Feb. 13, 2020), the California Supreme Court responded...
Read More >
The Illinois legislature has been quite active, leaving many employers wondering: “Is Illinois the ...
Read More >
This is the last article in our three-part series focused on the implications of robots and artifici...
Read More >
Court Holds Member States Must Require Employers to Adopt Systems to Record All Employee Working Tim...
Read More >
As reported in a previous Cooley alert, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law that was inten...
Read More >
Claims of racial bias brought by a black nurse who was reassigned by her employer after a white pati...
Read More >