X
07Aug

The California Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16600 as Applied to Business Contracts and Holds That an Independently Wrongful Act Is Necessary to Prove Interference With At-Will Contracts

The most powerful tool capable of invalidating competitive restraints under California law is Business and Professions Code section 16600. That statute states that “[e]very contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind is to that extent void.” California courts have historically used that statute to void non-compete and non-solicit provisions in agreements between employees and employers or buyers and sellers of a business....
By: Orrick - Trade Secrets Group
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-california-supreme-court-clarifies-57406/

Related

The SECURE Act doesn’t change one big problem for MEPs

While I loved the fact that pooled employer plan (PEP) is an option as a multiple employer plan (MEP...

Read More >

Has New York State Enacted a Workplace Civility Code?

The federal law known as Title VII, along with similar state laws, prohibits discrimination in emplo...

Read More >

Top Five Labor Law Developments For September 2019

1. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has adopted a new standard for determining whether cont...

Read More >

Exceptions to Coverage for “Excluded” Foreign Investors and States and Investment Funds From the Expanded CFIUS Jurisidiction

As discussed in the initial article on the new CFIUS regulations, there are two important exceptions...

Read More >

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will not extend logging deadline

Report on Supply Chain Compliance 2, no. 21 (November 7, 2019) - The deadline for compliance with a...

Read More >

California’s New Anti-Arbitration Law Temporarily Enjoined by Federal Court

UPDATE: On December 29, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued ...

Read More >