07Aug
The California Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16600 as Applied to Business Contracts and Holds That an Independently Wrongful Act Is Necessary to Prove Interference With At-Will Contracts
The most powerful tool capable of invalidating competitive restraints under California law is Business and Professions Code section 16600. That statute states that “[e]very contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind is to that extent void.” California courts have historically used that statute to void non-compete and non-solicit provisions in agreements between employees and employers or buyers and sellers of a business....
By:
Orrick - Trade Secrets Group
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-california-supreme-court-clarifies-57406/
Related
While I loved the fact that pooled employer plan (PEP) is an option as a multiple employer plan (MEP...
Read More >
The federal law known as Title VII, along with similar state laws, prohibits discrimination in emplo...
Read More >
1. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has adopted a new standard for determining whether cont...
Read More >
As discussed in the initial article on the new CFIUS regulations, there are two important exceptions...
Read More >
Report on Supply Chain Compliance 2, no. 21 (November 7, 2019) - The deadline for compliance with a...
Read More >
UPDATE: On December 29, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued ...
Read More >