X
07Aug

The California Supreme Court Clarifies Section 16600 as Applied to Business Contracts and Holds That an Independently Wrongful Act Is Necessary to Prove Interference With At-Will Contracts

The most powerful tool capable of invalidating competitive restraints under California law is Business and Professions Code section 16600. That statute states that “[e]very contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind is to that extent void.” California courts have historically used that statute to void non-compete and non-solicit provisions in agreements between employees and employers or buyers and sellers of a business....
By: Orrick - Trade Secrets Group
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-california-supreme-court-clarifies-57406/

Related

The Court Rules that A Short Absence from Work without Permission Does not Constitute Resignation

From time to time we are asked what to do in instances where employees are absent from work without ...

Read More >

OSHA Signals Its Regulatory Priorities In Fall Agenda

Twice a year, once in the spring and once in the fall, federal executive agencies, including OSHA, p...

Read More >

Injured employee testing positive for marijuana awarded workers’ compensation benefits

With Oklahoma’s new medical marijuana laws, employers will be facing more workplace questions invol...

Read More >

Construction contracts: ambiguities in remeasurement provisions

Remeasurement provisions are commonly used in construction and engineering contracts where there is ...

Read More >

Uber Drivers Are Contractors, Not Employees, NLRB Memo Says

Since the emergence of the “gig economy” in the last decade, courts and government agencies have g...

Read More >

NLRB Serves Up Guidance for Restaurants on Mandatory Arbitration Agreements in Post-Epic Systems Era

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently provided guidance in Cordúa Restaurants, Inc., 36...

Read More >