28Jul
Should I Stay Or Should I Go? The Proliferation Of Litigation Over Buyers’ Attempts To Unilaterally Terminate M&A Transactions In the Wake Of COVID-19
The changed economic landscape caused by COVID-19, with a shortage of debt financing and volatility in the stock market, has resulted in a dramatic downtick in M&A activity. Not only are buyers skittish about making acquisitions in the first instance, many buyers are now faced with the difficult decision of whether to terminate pending deals that have been signed, but have not yet closed, based on the “material adverse effect” (“MAE”) clause contained in their merger agreements......
By:
Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP
Related
At the end of 2019, Coty Inc. (“Coty”) expanded its brand portfolio by closing a notable $600 mill...
Read More >
The Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PP-4422 dated August 22, 2019, (Th...
Read More >
In its first significant decision applying the Supreme Court’s holding in Epic Systems v. NLRB, 584...
Read More >
In Factory Mut. Ins. Co. v. Skanska United States Bldg., No. 18-cv-11700-DLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS ...
Read More >
Successfully executing an acquisition from stress, distress, or insolvency requires a creative appro...
Read More >
Uzbekistan appears to be entering a new stage of development and investment opportunities. For many ...
Read More >