X
13Aug

Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/

Related

Vermont Health Care Update 02-03-2020 - An analysis from DRM's Health Law Team

Minimum wage bill heads to the Governor - On a vote of 23-6, the Senate voted on Thursday to concur...

Read More >

California Codifies Employee Classification Standards

On September 10, 2019, the California State Senate passed Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) effectively requiri...

Read More >

Florida Law Limits Physician Restrictive Covenants in Rural Counties

A recently passed Florida law, Florida Statutes 542.336 seeks to prevent medical providers from usin...

Read More >

In a Win for Employers, California Supreme Court Limits Reach of PAGA

On September 12, 2019, the California Supreme Court decided ZB N.A. v. Superior Court and issued a r...

Read More >

Eagerly Anticipated Guidance on Illinois’ Sexual Harassment Prevention and Training Requirements Released

The Illinois Department of Human Rights (IHDR) has answered the call for clarity and provided guidan...

Read More >

All in the Family – Why Controlled Group Rules Matter

It’s the time of year when we all gather around with our families and loved ones.  It’s also a goo...

Read More >