13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
On August 12, Baker Donelson’s Clinton Sanko sat down with Hal Brooks, CEO of HaystackID, and Andre...
Read More >
While it feels like we just finished the EEO-1 reporting season, the time is here again to start pre...
Read More >
Beginning as early as June 30, 2020, California employers with 5 or more California-based employees ...
Read More >
As we previously reported, on July 1, 2020, employees in D.C. will be eligible to receive benefits u...
Read More >
As counties and municipalities react to the outbreak of COVID-19, the typical development process is...
Read More >
Finding a hazard in need of a fix may be obvious after an incident occurs, but what about predicting...
Read More >