X
13Aug

Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/

Related

Philadelphia Zoning, Land Use, and Construction COVID-19 Update

State and City Government – General - With limited exceptions, all Philadelphia government buildin...

Read More >

Weekly Update Newsletter- January 2020 #3

PilieroMazza Wins HUBZone Small Business Resource Partner of the Year! The HUBZone Contractors Nati...

Read More >

New FLSA Rule Raises Minimum Salary Thresholds for Exemption from Overtime Pay

The U.S. Department of Labor (the “DOL”) has just released, after much anticipation, final updates...

Read More >

Legal issues for UK construction businesses - July 2019

Our latest round-up of Dentons' recent articles on topics that affect UK construction businesses.......

Read More >

Federal Court Blocks California’s Ban On Mandatory Arbitration Agreements

California employers just received a last-minute reprieve from complying with a newly enacted law th...

Read More >

Sixth Circuit says employers can’t shorten time for filing Title VII claims

In Logan v. MGM Grand Detroit Casino, released September 25, 2019, the United States Court of Appeal...

Read More >