13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
The Division of Workers’ Compensation is in the process of rolling out its new Workers’ Compensati...
Read More >
On April 18, the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry issued a policy statement announcing t...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on Aug. 12, 2019, published proposed amendments to its rul...
Read More >
When asked recently about the return of star quarterback Cam Newton, Carolina Panthers coach Ron Riv...
Read More >
Contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court’s restriction of class actions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes...
Read More >
The changes to the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (Act) comme...
Read More >