X
13Aug

Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/

Related

Confidentiality Is Back In Fashion Following Labor Board Decision

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) tha...

Read More >

EEOC FY 2019 Statistics Released: Charges of Discrimination are at an All-Time Low But the Percentage of Retaliation Charges Continues to Rise

There are a few surprises in the enforcement and litigation statistics for FY 2019 released by the E...

Read More >

DOL Issues Final Rule on Joint-Employer Status under Fair Labor Standards Act

On January 13, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) released its long-awaited final rule regardi...

Read More >

No, Unions Do Not Have A Free Speech Right To Engage In Unlawful Secondary Boycott Activity, Federal Appeals Court Rules

On October 28, 2019, the Ninth Circuit, following in the footsteps of the D.C. Circuit and the Secon...

Read More >

Uber to Pay $4.4 Million to Resolve EEOC Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Charge

Agency Commends Employer for Working Cooperatively With the EEOC on Harassment Prevention and Accoun...

Read More >