13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
Welcome to the Creativity in Compliance Podcast - a new offering from the Compliance Podcast Network...
Read More >
Agency Commends Employer for Working Cooperatively With the EEOC on Harassment Prevention and Accoun...
Read More >
Did you know that when a private sector employer has evidence that a union has lost support from a m...
Read More >
The Situation: Stockholders sought appraisal—judicial determination of the "fair value" of their st...
Read More >
The last thing a party wants is a construction claim rising to the level of needing a mediator, judg...
Read More >
The Sixth Circuit previously explained in Hostettler v. College of Wooster, 895 F.3d 844 (6th Cir. 2...
Read More >