13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
It has been nearly three months since Minnesota’s Wage Theft Statute took effect, and the initial c...
Read More >
As we have previously written, the issue of employment arbitration agreements and their effect on cl...
Read More >
In re Appraisal of Stillwater Mining Co., Consol. C.A. No. 2017-0385-JTL (Del. Ch. Aug. 21, 2019). ...
Read More >
In April 2019, Governor Jay Inslee signed SHB 1399, which amended the Washington Paid Family Medical...
Read More >
In an effort to save pension plans from insolvency, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed the...
Read More >
Dear Littler: A long-term San Francisco-based employee with our company is returning soon from mater...
Read More >