13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
Financial institutions M&A sector trends: payments — H2 2019 and outlook for 2020. Megadeals, incl...
Read More >
From regional to international $5-$100+ MM deals, our M&A team has extensive experience working with...
Read More >
Referencing a pop tune in the title of an article about organization design might seem a bit banal, ...
Read More >
On July 25, 2019, New Jersey enacted a law banning salary history inquiries, joining 18 other states...
Read More >
KEYSTONE RX, LLC v. AMERIHEALTH - A recent opinion from the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Summary: Like the singers in “California Dreamin,” many out-of-state employers—on a wint...
Read More >