13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
On the latest episode of Williams Mullen's Benefits Companion, Brydon DeWitt is joined by colleague ...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission, with the concurrence of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department ...
Read More >
Employers across the world are responding to the developing information on the coronavirus (referred...
Read More >
In William Lansing v. Doe, 2019 Ore. App. LEXIS 1564, the Court of Appeals of Oregon considered whet...
Read More >
For an entity that has historically placed an emphasis on maintaining the secrecy of its proceedings...
Read More >
In response to growing public concerns over outsourcing and offshoring, state legislators across the...
Read More >