13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
On September 5, 2019, the Washington Supreme Court confirmed that non-agricultural employers may use...
Read More >
The SECURE Act, signed into law on December 20, 2019, is the broadest piece of retirement legislatio...
Read More >
Automobiles have always been one of the fastest growing commodities since its creation in the mid-19...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) announced that it is releasing a final rule (the “Rul...
Read More >
he Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on January 28, 2020 that threshold limits under the Hart...
Read More >
Two recent cases in the UK illustrate the tricky issues Employers and Contractors have to grapple wi...
Read More >