13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
On August 30, 2019, California’s Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 778, extending for one year the de...
Read More >
Legislative Body Members Must be Neutral and Unbiased to Vote on Matters - In affirming a lower cou...
Read More >
At a time of crisis and economic upheaval, there is a natural tendency for people to pull together. ...
Read More >
The California Supreme Court clarified in a highly anticipated decision, that time spent waiting for...
Read More >
Antitrust agencies around the world are adjusting to the policies and procedures they quickly implem...
Read More >
The US Supreme Court recently decided a closely watched ERISA case against employers and fiduciaries...
Read More >