X
13Aug

Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/

Related

Life Sciences and Health Care Horizons - 2020

We are pleased to provide you with the third annual installment of our Life Sciences and Health Care...

Read More >

ERISA: “I Only Missed It By That Much” — Why the “Substantial Compliance” Doctrine May NOT Excuse Late-Issued Benefit Decisions Anymore

You already know that ERISA regulations set specific timelines for the issuance of ERISA-governed lo...

Read More >

Non-Disclosure Agreements and Arbitration Clauses in the #MeToo Era

With the proliferation of the #MeToo movement in late 2017 came concerns over the role that employme...

Read More >

[Video] #BigIdeas2020: NLRB’s Actions Impact Employers in 2020 - Employment Law This Week® - Trending News

A Trending News interview from Employment Law This Week®, featuring attorney Steve Swirsky, Member o...

Read More >

U.S. Merger Notification Threshold Falls to $92 Million

U.S. merger notification thresholds decline for just the second time; take effect on March 4, 2021. ...

Read More >

UK Public M&A Update — H1 2020

In this update, we consider key statistics, trends, developments and highlights regarding U.K. publi...

Read More >