06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
The past week brought two important developments in connection with the Committee on Foreign Investm...
Read More >
I was going to save this post for the Yankees run into the World Series, but with the Yankees losing...
Read More >
In 2019, the New York State Legislature made substantial changes to workplace laws. It seems likely ...
Read More >
More than thirty years ago, the Washington Supreme Court ruled defense counsel may not engage in ex ...
Read More >
Proposed revisions to current financial statement disclosure requirements for business acquisitions ...
Read More >
The FTC and the DOJ Antitrust Division have again warned companies, along with their board members a...
Read More >