06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed the new recreational cannabis bill, which ...
Read More >
This week, the U.S. House of Representatives will consider and vote on the legislative vehicle to im...
Read More >
Last week, the New York State Legislature passed a bill prohibiting employers from asking about the ...
Read More >
On July 23, 2020, the French Competition Authority (the "Authority") published its new guidelines on...
Read More >
In late 2019, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided that the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act (“PMWA”...
Read More >
Last Wednesday, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court concluded that receipt of participant disclosures and...
Read More >