06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
As businesses throughout the State of California continue to grapple with the potential implications...
Read More >
Mit unseren auf Technologietransaktionen spezialisierten Teams in allen wichtigen globalen Märkten b...
Read More >
In 2019, we have seen the worldwide antitrust enforcement trend continue, keeping even Silicon Valle...
Read More >
On December 18, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 119-page post-trial memorandum opinion...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Google’s recent travails with simultaneous traditional and “reverse” discrimi...
Read More >
Employers can breathe easy once again knowing that common law reasonable notice is still capped at 2...
Read More >