X
06Aug

Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?

In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/ninth-circuit-asks-california-supreme-18089/

Related

Fourth Circuit Says Federal Hate Crime Law Applies to Workplace Assault

The federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act applies severe criminal penalties for violent acts that are m...

Read More >

Philadelphia Zoning, Land Use, and Construction COVID-19 Update

The Ballard Spahr Zoning and Land Use Team is continuing to monitor all aspects of the Philadelphia ...

Read More >

[Video] Monthly Minute | Due Diligence Considerations Related to COVID-19

Once a month, we cover an interesting topic with a short video. This month, Associate Sarah Beth Bar...

Read More >

Financial institutions M&A: Sector trends - February 2020: Specialty Finance/Marketplace Lending

Financial institutions M&A sector trends: specialty finance/marketplace lending — H2 2019 and outlo...

Read More >

New California Housing Laws: AB 68 Accessory Dwelling Units

On January 1, 2020, several housing-related bills recently signed into law by the Governor take effe...

Read More >

Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)

On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, ...

Read More >