06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
As expected, California’s effort to ban employers from requiring employees and applicants to sign a...
Read More >
The other night I found myself in a Brazilian Jiu-jitsu class with a 250-pound musclebound gentleman...
Read More >
The U.S. Department of Justice's ("DOJ") new remedies guide reinforces its strong preferences for st...
Read More >
New guidance from the Small Business Administration (SBA) sheds light on questions that arise in the...
Read More >
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit vacated the district court’s dismissal of trademark a...
Read More >
As the holiday season approaches, it is a good time for employers to review their policies and take ...
Read More >