06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litig, Consol. C.A. No. 2017-0337-SG (Del. Ch. June 22, 2020) - At th...
Read More >
Investment Management and Private Funds - Summer enforcement action review; raising money in a pande...
Read More >
As 2019 draws to a close, it is time to take a close look at some of the most important new laws tha...
Read More >
The Retirement Advantage, Inc. (TRA), a national third-party administrator (TPA)announced the acquis...
Read More >
In its most recent legislative session, Texas lawmakers took a number of steps designed to protect s...
Read More >
In 2018, the Supreme Court of California turned much of the established law regarding worker classif...
Read More >