06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
In addition to a company’s senior management, there is a Board of Directors at the top. Yet the rol...
Read More >
M&A transactions involving government contractors are subject to a host of regulatory and industry-s...
Read More >
This month's key California employment law cases involve disability discrimination, wage and hour, a...
Read More >
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz's Executive Order 20-20 requesting Minnesotans to limit movements outsid...
Read More >
The Court of Appeal has ruled that the grand bargain underpinning the workers’ compensation system ...
Read More >
There may soon be a fair number of big-rig trucks for sale in California, as well as computers, desk...
Read More >