06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
In recent years, a number of federal courts have drawn differing conclusions with regard to whether ...
Read More >
In a move certain to bring employers some holiday cheer, the NLRB has announced changes to its rules...
Read More >
On the heels of enacting a law to prohibit hairstyle discrimination, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ...
Read More >
Among the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) rulemaking priorities under the National Labor Re...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Although it is not law yet, according to the must-pass spending legislation passe...
Read More >
According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), retaliation claims continue to...
Read More >