06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), led by members appointed by President Barack Obama and wi...
Read More >
The problem with being a 401(k) plan sponsor is that you have to be on top of everything because as ...
Read More >
Government contractors should be aware that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is taking new steps to s...
Read More >
Six months after a little-noticed bill passed unanimously by the General Assembly (and was then veto...
Read More >
Gables Construction, Inc. v. Red Coats, Inc., No. 23, 2020 BL 193791, 2020 MD LEXIS 264 (Md. May 26,...
Read More >
Pillsbury continues to track the impact on construction projects of COVID-19-related orders and guid...
Read More >