06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
Connecticut has followed a growing trend among the states by implementing a system to provide paid t...
Read More >
In 2016, the EEOC revised its EEO-1 form that collects pay data from employers with 100 or more empl...
Read More >
Over the past few days, several Midwestern states have issued stay-at-home orders and closed non-ess...
Read More >
As announced by the Chancellor in the run up to the recent General Election, the Government is launc...
Read More >
The United Kingdom and the European Union are set to take bold strides towards the regulation of dig...
Read More >
Coating, Painting and Sandblasting Company Fired Employee Due to Hearing Loss, Federal Agency Says -...
Read More >