06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
On Monday, June 3rd, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) approved...
Read More >
On September 15, 2020, the US Department of the Treasury issued a Final Rule comprising the latest r...
Read More >
Let’s face it – your dealership’s employee handbook is likely out of date, even if you just updat...
Read More >
As businesses begin to reopen following the COVID-19 shut down of 2020, it is clear that the "busine...
Read More >
It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new ...
Read More >
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett Internatio...
Read More >