06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
Ensuring a healthy food industry supply chain is vital as we cope with the effects of the current pa...
Read More >
Over the past week we have seen an increasing number of employers grappling with the real, as oppose...
Read More >
The Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment – Division of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) and...
Read More >
The California Supreme Court has handed down yet another decision broadening the scope of what is co...
Read More >
The 16th Amendment to the German Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance entered into effect on October...
Read More >
Applicants sought to subdivide two lots located at 550 Hill Street and 554 Hill Street in the Villag...
Read More >