06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: St. Louis has become the third locality in Missouri to enact a “Ban the Box” la...
Read More >
On 8 October 2020, the Insolvency Service published the outcome of its review of industry reforms to...
Read More >
On July 23, 2019, the Chicago City Council passed the Chicago Fair Workweek Ordinance (Ordinance). T...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board just ruled that employers may now require confidentiality from em...
Read More >
After an M&A deal closes, the purchaser may discover information that it considers erroneous in the ...
Read More >
A decree, dated July 26, 2019, has set a principle of modulation of employers’ contribution to the ...
Read More >