06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: As measured by the top ten largest case resolutions in various workplace class ac...
Read More >
To almost everyone’s delight, OSHA has filled the vital position of the Director of the Directorate...
Read More >
For decades, the problem of scheduling has plagued employers and employees alike. Employees prefer p...
Read More >
A private equity (PE) transaction can help physicians “hedge” the uncertain future of private medi...
Read More >
In Allison v. Eriksson, 479 Mass. 626 (Mass. 2018), a majority LLC member undertook a merger in viol...
Read More >
As Tom celebrates the Astros franchise record of 104 wins (to-date) and Jay continues to avoid talki...
Read More >