06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
At both the state and federal level, antitrust enforcement agencies continue to pursue successful ch...
Read More >
The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has released a ...
Read More >
Advocates are warning that a little-noticed proposed rule change could result in hundreds of thousan...
Read More >
For your Labor Day Weekend enjoyment. Misclassifying workers does not violate the NLRA. The Nationa...
Read More >
Arbitration agreements are a powerful tool in resolving employment actions. As we noted last year, ...
Read More >
A New Zealand advertising agency employee recently made headlines after bringing an emotional suppor...
Read More >