06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
Employees are a company’s most important assets. A key executive or manager can make the difference...
Read More >
..Based on the Department of Labor’s Final Rule, the minimum annual salary level for most employees...
Read More >
On June 14, 2019, the Southern District of New York declined to certify a consumer fraud class actio...
Read More >
This is part two of the article presenting amendments to the Polish Labor Code. Next week you will r...
Read More >
Q. A client of my company asked whether it could offer production bonuses to our employees who deli...
Read More >
Changes to the H-1B program threaten the efficacy of the system, as well as the path to the U.S. for...
Read More >