06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
The federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act applies severe criminal penalties for violent acts that are m...
Read More >
The Ballard Spahr Zoning and Land Use Team is continuing to monitor all aspects of the Philadelphia ...
Read More >
Once a month, we cover an interesting topic with a short video. This month, Associate Sarah Beth Bar...
Read More >
Financial institutions M&A sector trends: specialty finance/marketplace lending — H2 2019 and outlo...
Read More >
On January 1, 2020, several housing-related bills recently signed into law by the Governor take effe...
Read More >
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, ...
Read More >