06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
Since the start of fiscal year 2020 (October 1, 2019-September 30, 2020), the Equal Employment Oppor...
Read More >
The goal of any construction project, no matter how large or small, is completion of the project on ...
Read More >
This is an update to previous posts from June 24, 2019 and July 31, 2019. On Friday, November 22, B...
Read More >
On September 20, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (Board) issued a proposed rule that would ...
Read More >
Can an employee bring a claim against an employer if the employer bases an employment-related decisi...
Read More >
What can we expect from the Federal Communications Commission from the incoming administration of Pr...
Read More >