06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
The SECURE Act – the “Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement” Act – was signed in...
Read More >
As previously addressed by the OSHA Law Blog, California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards...
Read More >
On March 24, the Ohio Department of Transportation released a “Statement Regarding COVID-19 Respons...
Read More >
When a contractor delivers goods to the government that do not conform to the precise requirements o...
Read More >
Maryland employers are now prohibited from enforcing non-compete agreements against employees earnin...
Read More >
Financial institutions M&A sector trends: brokers/corporate finance — H2 2019 and outlook for 2020....
Read More >