06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
This month, New Jersey’s Division on Civil Rights (DCR) issued Findings and Recommendations on Prev...
Read More >
On February 2, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that in 2021 the threshold for app...
Read More >
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker issued a shelter-in-place Executive Order on March 20, 2020, the lat...
Read More >
On October 7, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor announced a proposed rule that would allow employer...
Read More >
Halliburton Supervisors and Co-Workers Harassed Two Muslim Employees, Federal Agency Charged - DAL...
Read More >
As Oklahoma lawmakers make their way through the 2020 legislative session, I thought I would take a ...
Read More >