06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
In this episode I visit with Vin DiCianni on how ethical culture is a part of an overall ethics and...
Read More >
In re Anthem-Cigna Merger Litigation, C.A. No. 2017-0114- JTL (Del. Ch. August 31, 2020) - This act...
Read More >
New Jersey has expanded its medical marijuana program and—for the first time since the state enacte...
Read More >
On January 31, 2020, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) announced the release of a new ...
Read More >
Fiat Chrysler and rival Peugeot have agreed to binding merger terms that, if approved by US and Euro...
Read More >
The Court of Appeal in Group Seven Limited v. Notable Services LLP [2019] EWCA Civ 614 has agreed wi...
Read More >