06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
While a precise number is not known, it has been estimated that the total amount of retirement benef...
Read More >
On Christmas Eve, the Third Circuit issued a decision restricting certification of wage/hour classes...
Read More >
Italian Restaurant Unlawfully Fired Server Because of Pregnancy and Childbirth, Federal Agency Charg...
Read More >
The City of Oakland spent the last four years developing the Downtown Oakland Specific Plan to addre...
Read More >
Vladimirsky v. School Dist. of Phila., 206 A. 3d 1224 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2019). The Pennsylvania Commo...
Read More >
The socioeconomic fallout of COVID-19 represents an enormous challenge for the construction sector, ...
Read More >