06Aug
Ninth Circuit Asks California Supreme Court: Is Absence Of A Formal Meal And Rest Break Policy A Violation Of California Law?
In Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2012) 273 P.3d 513, the California Supreme Court explained that an employer must relieve the employee of all duty for the designated meal period, but need not ensure that the employee does not work. In...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Related
The Illinois General Assembly recently passed a number of bills that will, if signed by Governor Pri...
Read More >
Employers may have to prepare for an entirely new pay data reporting requirement to be revealed in t...
Read More >
It can be tempting for a "losing" party in adjudication to defend itself against the winner's enforc...
Read More >
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy issued Executive Order No. 122 on Wednesday, April 8, 2020, halting all ...
Read More >
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) threatened to start to carry out a series of immigration r...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Does Pennsylvania’s public policy preclude a nuclear power plant from terminati...
Read More >