X
21May

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion

Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/

Related

More Consolidation, IPOs Ahead for Digital Health Companies

Virtual healthcare staked out exciting new ground with the recently announced $18.5 billion merger o...

Read More >

Court Rejects Equitable Exception To MPPAA’s ‘Pay Now, Dispute Later’ Regime

A withdrawing employer must make withdrawal liability installment payments during the pendency of an...

Read More >

Coronavirus: Factors for the Insurance Industry to Consider - Part 3 Liability and Workers’ Compensation Insurance

Given the risk to life and the economic impact of coronavirus, policyholders and the insurance indus...

Read More >

Some Good News: New IRS Guidance for Renewable Energy Projects

IRS Notice 2020-41 provides relief for renewable energy projects that began construction in 2016 or ...

Read More >

ICE Begins STEM OPT Worksite Inspections

There have been an increasing number of reports that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has b...

Read More >

Chancery Declines to Order Specific Performance of $5.8 Billion Luxury Hotel Deal Scuttled by COVID-19 Changes to Hotel Business Operations

AB Stable VIII LLC v. MAPS Hotels and Resorts One LLC, C.A. No. 2020-0310-JTL (Del. Ch. Nov. 30, 202...

Read More >