21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
Provided their qualifications meet the necessary standards, nurses educated and trained outside the ...
Read More >
Less than two months apart, two U.S. Courts of Appeal examined the same two issues involving Amazon ...
Read More >
Minimum Wage Increase - New Legislation Enacted - On July 1, 2019, employees under the national mi...
Read More >
M&A activity in the retail sector fell sharply during the first half of 2019, as uncertainty and dig...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board continues its efforts to revisit earlier decisions that expanded ...
Read More >
The podcast celebrates its 50th birthday with special guest David Weisenfeld at XpertHR, who joins t...
Read More >