21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
On July 10, 2019, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation significantly expanding the prot...
Read More >
On November 19, 2019, Judge William M. Campbell of the United States District Court for the Middle D...
Read More >
The Confidentiality (or Non-Disclosure) Agreement (NDA) is the most maligned, and the most likely to...
Read More >
Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. RSI Holdco, LLC, C.A. No. 2018-0517-KSJM (Del. Ch. May 29...
Read More >
As the evolution of the gig economy continues, highly skilled workers who operate on a project-by-pr...
Read More >
A recent decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upholding termination of a st...
Read More >