21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
The issue of whether athletic referees are independent contractors has surfaced a few times in the l...
Read More >
Beset by ongoing tariff wars, Brexit fallout, heightened sanctions, and other geopolitical tumult, g...
Read More >
By means of Resolution No. 77896 of 2020, the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) in Colo...
Read More >
Decision highlights the need to coordinate document production in parallel cross-border merger contr...
Read More >
HR Professionals will soon know the answer to this question. The United States Supreme Court is pr...
Read More >
LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW - Bloomberg Quotes PM Partner Nichole Atallah: Trump Rescinds Obama Order P...
Read More >