21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
2019 was a banner year for billion-dollar life sciences M&A transactions. A wave of big-ticket trans...
Read More >
The State of California recently passed SB-83, which extends Paid Family Leave benefits from six to ...
Read More >
Over the past week, U.S. antitrust authorities have further refined their temporary merger review pr...
Read More >
Construction claims often feature supporting testimony from design and/or scheduling experts, and ex...
Read More >
Homeowners associations ("HOAs") do not typically act as construction owners. HOAs are set up as en...
Read More >
Although my focus as a recruiter at Major, Lindsey & Africa is on representing law firm partners and...
Read More >