21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
As discussed in a previous alert, the 2018–19 New York State budget included provisions designed to...
Read More >
Does it make sense, strategically, to send out a form letter now making a claim for more time and mo...
Read More >
The Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate (i.e., the requirement that most individuals obtain ad...
Read More >
February 1 is the deadline for broadcast stations licensed to communities in Arkansas, Kansas, Louis...
Read More >
As of November 8, 2019, New York State prohibits employment discrimination based on an employee’s o...
Read More >
Here’s a comprehensive list of the new employment-related statutes enacted and signed into law in t...
Read More >