21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
The close of the decade ended with a flurry of activity on the labor and employment front, creating ...
Read More >
Australia requires a wide variety of investments by foreign businesses to be reviewed and approved b...
Read More >
The truth is that cannabis has now become (and continues to become) big business and the issue of re...
Read More >
On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Labor issued its final rule concerning overtime exemptions. The r...
Read More >
The U.S. Department of Labor’s new joint employment regulations appear to provide franchisors and s...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: CEOs need to regain American’s trust. (Houston Chron...
Read More >