21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
The podcast celebrates its 50th birthday with special guest David Weisenfeld at XpertHR, who joins t...
Read More >
Sixty former workers of Load Trail, a leading trailer manufacturing business, have filed a class-act...
Read More >
On Thursday, October 10, 2019, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law several new measures tha...
Read More >
Many U.S. employers have recently experienced frustration over legal obstacles to keeping high quali...
Read More >
On July 24th, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Executive Order No. 7JJJ, which creates a rebut...
Read More >
The EEOC announced yesterday, September 12, 2019, that it “is not seeking to renew Component 2 of t...
Read More >