21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
Virtual healthcare staked out exciting new ground with the recently announced $18.5 billion merger o...
Read More >
A withdrawing employer must make withdrawal liability installment payments during the pendency of an...
Read More >
Given the risk to life and the economic impact of coronavirus, policyholders and the insurance indus...
Read More >
IRS Notice 2020-41 provides relief for renewable energy projects that began construction in 2016 or ...
Read More >
There have been an increasing number of reports that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has b...
Read More >
AB Stable VIII LLC v. MAPS Hotels and Resorts One LLC, C.A. No. 2020-0310-JTL (Del. Ch. Nov. 30, 202...
Read More >