X
21May

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion

Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/

Related

[Virtual Event] 2021 J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference - Healthcare Private Equity (PE) Leaders Forum - January 12th, 12:00 pm - 2:15 pm EST

You won’t want to miss four days of exclusive, virtual events that bring together industry leaders,...

Read More >

[Video] #WorkforceWednesday: Guidance for Critical Infrastructure Workers; OSHA Reporting Guidance; EEOC Update - Employment Law This Week®

Welcome to #WorkforceWednesday. This weekly newsletter provides you with a cost-free, convenient way...

Read More >

Impact of the Coronavirus outbreak on Employment Relationship

On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization has announced the outbreak of novel coronavirus (...

Read More >

California Supreme Court Will Have The Final Word On Exceptions To Activity-Based Pay Systems

Over a decade has passed since an appellate court in California ruled that employers could not avera...

Read More >

Public Health vs. Patient Privacy – How Coronavirus is Putting HIPAA to the Test

In a recent blog post, colleagues in our Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice addressed...

Read More >

2020 Appropriations Act Contains Significant Retirement Provisions (Secure Act)

On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (the ...

Read More >