21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
Last week, the Department of Treasury and the IRS issued final regulations regarding hardship distri...
Read More >
As the new coronavirus (COVID-19) slowly appears outside China, employers should take precautions to...
Read More >
Massachusetts employers should be making their final preparations for the Massachusetts Paid Family ...
Read More >
As we wrote in November 2018, the Treasury Department issued proposed regulations that significantly...
Read More >
On August 9, 2019, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued USERRA Fact Sheet 1, providing guidance ...
Read More >
With the implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, it was only a matter of time before th...
Read More >