21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
In Jozefowicz v. Allstate Ins. Co. (No. G055643, filed 5/28/19), a California appeals court held tha...
Read More >
It seems almost every day we are presented with more evidence that automation is having profound con...
Read More >
Despite “troubling” government conduct, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) recen...
Read More >
As we have previously discussed, the Puerto Rico Department of Labor (PR DOL) recently published the...
Read More >
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS & ADVISORY SERVICES - Small Business Administration – SBA issued a rule e...
Read More >
On June 24, 2020, Governor Roy Cooper signed Executive Order No. 147 (“Order 147”), extending Nort...
Read More >