X
21May

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion

Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/

Related

Foreign Nurses: Are You Qualified to Work in the US?

Provided their qualifications meet the necessary standards, nurses educated and trained outside the ...

Read More >

Amazon and Products Liability: What A Difference the Mason-Dixon Line Makes

Less than two months apart, two U.S. Courts of Appeal examined the same two issues involving Amazon ...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - Australia - Q2 2019

Minimum Wage Increase - New Legislation Enacted - On July 1, 2019, employees under the national mi...

Read More >

Defying gravity: US M&A H1 2019: Retail M&A falls as sector migrates online

M&A activity in the retail sector fell sharply during the first half of 2019, as uncertainty and dig...

Read More >

National Labor Relations Board Reopens Rules Related to Union Activity

The National Labor Relations Board continues its efforts to revisit earlier decisions that expanded ...

Read More >

[Audio] Employment Law Now III-50 - A 50th Birthday Celebration Episode

The podcast celebrates its 50th birthday with special guest David Weisenfeld at XpertHR, who joins t...

Read More >