21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
You won’t want to miss four days of exclusive, virtual events that bring together industry leaders,...
Read More >
Welcome to #WorkforceWednesday. This weekly newsletter provides you with a cost-free, convenient way...
Read More >
On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization has announced the outbreak of novel coronavirus (...
Read More >
Over a decade has passed since an appellate court in California ruled that employers could not avera...
Read More >
In a recent blog post, colleagues in our Employment, Labor & Workforce Management practice addressed...
Read More >
On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (the ...
Read More >