X
21May

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion

Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/

Related

Client Alert: IRS Releases Final 2019 ACA Employer Reporting Forms And Instructions

The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has just released the Final Forms and Instructions for 2019 i...

Read More >

July 2019 Independent Contractor Misclassification and Compliance News Update

We are often asked, what industries are impacted by independent contractor misclassification? While...

Read More >

St. Lucia: Force Majeure clauses and the Doctrine of Frustration

The COVID-19 Virus was declared a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” by the World ...

Read More >

[Video] Hughes Hubbard 2019 FCPA and Anti-Bribery Alert, Part 3: Anti-Bribery Enforcement in France with Bryan Sillaman

Welcome to a special five-part podcast series from the Compliance Podcast Network. In this series I ...

Read More >

Directors' fiduciary duties to shareholders

Most cases which come before the courts in connection with the sale and purchase of a company are br...

Read More >