21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Home Décor Business Fired Warehouse Employee for Taking Unpaid Leave It Forced Her to Use, Federal A...
Read More >
The COVID-19 crisis has set in train a cascade of events that will impede, delay or prevent performa...
Read More >
If the COVID-19 pandemic was not already difficult enough on the D.C. real estate development commun...
Read More >
Financial institutions M&A sector trends: specialty finance/marketplace lending — H1 2019 and outlo...
Read More >
One of the key points that representatives of the DOJ and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) h...
Read More >
On April 6, 2018, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2018-3 in ...
Read More >