21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
Brydon DeWitt discusses captive insurance arrangement strategies with CPA Scott Bailey, Jr., a partn...
Read More >
In the latest volley across the partisan line in the saga of whether college teaching and research a...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The DOL has published its 2020 increases to OSHA civil penalties. We have blogge...
Read More >
The rapid spread of COVID-19 has disrupted global commerce, destabilized the world’s leading econom...
Read More >
Technology is rapidly evolving, and the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), automation and robotics...
Read More >
Sometimes the school teacher refrains, “everyone be quiet” or “back to your corners” can feel li...
Read More >