21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Last week, in response to the outbreak of the Coronavirus disease (COVID19), the antitrust agencies ...
Read More >
In Heinze v. Tesco Corp., No. 19-20298, 2020 WL 4814094 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 2020), the United States ...
Read More >
For years, steep arbitration fees have made many employers think twice about contesting a questionab...
Read More >
Employers must understand what they can and cannot do now that the Social Security Administration (S...
Read More >
New York partner Bradd Williamson, Global Chair of Latham’s Benefits, Compensation & Employment Pra...
Read More >
If not immune to surprise at this point in 2020, that might be the appropriate feeling at the appare...
Read More >