X
21May

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion

Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/

Related

Final Hardship Distribution Regulations, Part One: Key Changes and Deadlines for Plan Sponsors

Last week, the Department of Treasury and the IRS issued final regulations regarding hardship distri...

Read More >

CDC Issues Guidance On The Coronavirus For Employers

As the new coronavirus (COVID-19) slowly appears outside China, employers should take precautions to...

Read More >

Prepare to Implement Paid Family and Medical Leave Under New Massachusetts Law

Massachusetts employers should be making their final preparations for the Massachusetts Paid Family ...

Read More >

Final Regulations Issued for Hardship Distributions From Qualified Retirement Plans

As we wrote in November 2018, the Treasury Department issued proposed regulations that significantly...

Read More >

DOL Clarifies Employers’ Retirement Plan Obligations Under USERRA

On August 9, 2019, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued USERRA Fact Sheet 1, providing guidance ...

Read More >

Labor & Employment E-Note - February 2020

With the implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, it was only a matter of time before th...

Read More >