21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
A key responsibility for any ethics and compliance professional is to help build and maintain a work...
Read More >
What have been some of the advancements in compliance this century? One of the key recent innovation...
Read More >
On January 9, 2020, the Iowa Court of Appeals released two opinions – Dix v. Casey’s General Store...
Read More >
In the midst of the turmoil visited by the COVID-19 Virus, Florida’s governor announced plans to tr...
Read More >
Q: We recently terminated an employee and are paying severance for several weeks; however, the emplo...
Read More >
On January 31, 2020, the United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced the releas...
Read More >