21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
The Situation: On June 21, 2020, the Saudi Minister of Tourism, Ahmed Al-Khateeb, announced the crea...
Read More >
Thomas H. Lee Partners and Frazier Healthcare Partners have acquired Adare Pharmaceuticals from TPG ...
Read More >
On October 9, 2019, the Second Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal issued a decisio...
Read More >
As we find ourselves in the midst of summer, employers in New York should keep an eye on the upcomin...
Read More >
Employers must understand what they can and cannot do now that the Social Security Administration (S...
Read More >
If your company sponsors a 401(k) or 403(b) plan that allows participants to take hardship distribut...
Read More >