21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
In a long-awaited decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has concluded that the fluctuating workwe...
Read More >
On 27 June 2019 the European Commission imposed a fine of €28 million on the Japanese imaging and o...
Read More >
As of July 2, 2019, New Jersey has extended workplace protections to employees and healthcare practi...
Read More >
Evolution Capital Partners has acquired Health Technologies, according to a news release. Health Te...
Read More >
With some Canada Labour Code (CLC) amendments in Bill C-44, the Budget Implementation Act, 2017, No....
Read More >
Many companies will consider selling their offshore captives/GICs in the wake of COVID-19, especiall...
Read More >