21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has just released the Final Forms and Instructions for 2019 i...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: On June 13, 2019, Governor Baker signed into law S 2255, officially delaying the...
Read More >
We are often asked, what industries are impacted by independent contractor misclassification? While...
Read More >
The COVID-19 Virus was declared a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” by the World ...
Read More >
Welcome to a special five-part podcast series from the Compliance Podcast Network. In this series I ...
Read More >
Most cases which come before the courts in connection with the sale and purchase of a company are br...
Read More >