21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
With the increasing reliance of U.S. employers on high-skilled foreign workers, particularly those o...
Read More >
According to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), approximately 40 ...
Read More >
On May 15, 2020, in Geo-technology Associates Inc. v. Capital Station Dover, LLC, the Delaware Supre...
Read More >
As discussed , New York Lien Law § 19(6) provides a procedure for an expedited legal action seeking ...
Read More >
The status of what businesses can remain open, in what capacity, and with access to whom, is ever-ch...
Read More >
In this episode, Meghan Meade discusses employer obligations towards disabled employees in light of ...
Read More >