X
21May

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion

Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/

Related

[Audio] PODCAST: Benefits Companion - Captive Insurance Arrangements

Brydon DeWitt discusses captive insurance arrangement strategies with CPA Scott Bailey, Jr., a partn...

Read More >

NLRB Does What Every Watcher Expected It To Do: Declares That Teaching And Research Assistants Are Not Employees…And Does So In A Proposed Rule

In the latest volley across the partisan line in the saga of whether college teaching and research a...

Read More >

Surprise! (NOT) – OSHA Increases Civil Penalties for 2020

Seyfarth Synopsis: The DOL has published its 2020 increases to OSHA civil penalties. We have blogge...

Read More >

FIDIC COVID-19 Guidance Memorandum

The rapid spread of COVID-19 has disrupted global commerce, destabilized the world’s leading econom...

Read More >

The AI Revolution is Starting to Impact the Workplace

Technology is rapidly evolving, and the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), automation and robotics...

Read More >

Can I Tell my Employee to Please Shut Up?

Sometimes the school teacher refrains, “everyone be quiet” or “back to your corners” can feel li...

Read More >