21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
The DE OFCCP Week in Review (WIR) is a simple, fast and direct summary of relevant happenings in the...
Read More >
As we reported, New York State has enacted laws prohibiting mandatory arbitration of sexual harassme...
Read More >
Arnall Golden Gregory LLP is pleased to provide you with the Compliance News Flash, which includes c...
Read More >
For some time we have been following with interest the case of Bresco Electrical Services Ltd (in li...
Read More >
On October 10, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 9 into law, which, effective January...
Read More >
On June 19, 2019, the New York Legislature voted to reform New York discrimination law. See NYS Asse...
Read More >