21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
In Popeck v. Rawlings Company, LLC, No. 19-5092 (October 16, 2019), the U.S. Court of Appeals for th...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) has reversed one of the Obama Board’s mo...
Read More >
Dear YouDig? We are thrilled to be adding a four story children’s wing to our hospital. Constructi...
Read More >
For many years, the development industry in Florida has been able to extend building permits, develo...
Read More >
Sharp, attentive, long-time followers of this update expressed dismay last year when I declared the ...
Read More >
Currently, certain employers are required under federal law to file annual Employer Information Repo...
Read More >