21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Package Delivery Company to Reimburse Pregnant Employees Not Granted Accommodations Under Company's ...
Read More >
Continuing its independent program of workplace regulations, Minneapolis has enacted its own wage th...
Read More >
Earlier this week, three taxpayers sued California Secretary of State Alex Padilla to prevent enforc...
Read More >
The amended Conveyancing (Sale of Land) Act and Conveyancing (Sale of Land) Regulation have raised t...
Read More >
Calculating overtime pay for tipped employees working in multiple positions at different rates in a ...
Read More >
Joining the ranks of several other states and local jurisdictions that have taken similar steps in t...
Read More >