21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Almost everyone can remember a time when you asked permission to do something that your mother thoug...
Read More >
The coronavirus epidemic has disrupted our world in ways we could not have imagined a few weeks ago....
Read More >
When cited for violation of OSHA safety rules, employers can assert an “unpreventable employee misc...
Read More >
At the end of August, California Governor Newsom signed AB 1804, a law that alters the method by whi...
Read More >
30 FAQs about the New Rule - The Department of Labor (“DOL”) unveiled the final version of its ov...
Read More >
Athletic Apparel Manufacturer Fired Temporary Employee Because of Her Disabilities, Federal Agency C...
Read More >