13May
Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement
In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By:
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/
Related
In an earlier post, we covered the local Shelter-in-Place (“SIP”) orders, which severely restricte...
Read More >
In Fortier v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 916 F.3d 74 (1st Cir. 2019) the U.S. Court of Appea...
Read More >
As we approach the end of the year, it is critical to remember and implement some of the new legal r...
Read More >
Earlier this year, we summarized proposed Treasury regulations and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018...
Read More >
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that it will once again use the Date...
Read More >
There were some significant announcements for the construction sector in Budget 2020: NZ$3 billion i...
Read More >