X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

Affordable Housing in Minnesota Not Significantly Impacted by Governor’s “Stay At Home” Order

On March 25, 2020, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz issued Emergency Executive Order 20-20 in response to...

Read More >

Non-Binary Employees and Component 2 of the EEO-1 Report

If your company employs 100 or more employees or has 50 or more employees and a federal contract of ...

Read More >

[Webinar] The Government Construction Contract Transition: Making the Plunge from Commercial to Government Work - February 18th, 2:00 pm ET

Given the slowdown of construction activity, there is an inevitable uptick in government contract ac...

Read More >

Court Holds That Temporary Labor Company Not a “Subcontractor” For Lien Purposes

Do you think that there is a difference between “furnishing” labor and “performing” labor? (Is t...

Read More >

Delaware Court Adopts Pillsbury Theory that Shareholder Appraisal Actions Are Covered Securities Claims Under D&O Policies

Pillsbury secured an important victory for its client, Solera Holdings Inc., when Delaware Superior ...

Read More >