X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

You’re a Grand Old Flag – A (Very) Brief History in Employment Law

With Independence Day nearly upon us (and with many offices on skeleton crews this week), I thought ...

Read More >

COVID-19 Relief: The Time is Now for a Federal Infrastructure Bill

Although the federal government is pouring trillions of dollars into the U.S. economy through stimul...

Read More >

California Bill Makes Gig Economy Workers ‘Employees’

Companies who use app-based technology platforms to connect consumers directly with service provider...

Read More >

AB5 is now law in California. Now what?

On September 18, 2019, California governor Gavin Newsom signed into law a contentious piece of legis...

Read More >

In Case You Missed It: Launch Links - January 2020

Some interesting links we found across the web this week: How Some Founders are Raising Capital Out...

Read More >

FTC and DOJ Approve Changes to HSR Rules and Form

The Federal Trade Commission, with the concurrence of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department ...

Read More >