X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

Supreme Court finds that offending words can be severed from non-compete restrictive covenants

The Supreme Court has considered the law on severance of restrictive covenants, and further develope...

Read More >

How To Complete EEO-1 Report With Non-Binary Employees

The EEOC recently released guidance to assist those employers filling out their EEO-1 reports who ha...

Read More >

Is Your Construction Project “Essential”?

As the coronavirus pandemic’s devastating impacts continue to evolve, governments at all levels (lo...

Read More >

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Material Adverse Effect and M&A Transactions

Acquisition agreements customarily address risk associated with significant downward changes to the ...

Read More >

OFCCP Will Not Use EEO-1 Component 2 Data In Audits

On November 22, 2019, OFCCP announced it will not “request, accept, or use” EEO-1 Component 2 pay ...

Read More >

Diving Into OFCCP’s Construction Contractor Technical Assistance Guide

The recently updated Construction Contractors Technical Assistance Guide (“TAG”) provides construc...

Read More >