X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

Update: Waterloo, Iowa Enacts Ban the Box Restrictions

Seyfarth Synopsis: Waterloo, Iowa has enacted the state’s first “Ban the Box” Ordinance. UPDATE:...

Read More >

7th Circuit Holds Retiree Medical Coverage Vested for Life Based on Unambiguous Durational Language in Collective Bargaining Agreement

It is well established that welfare plans are not subject to the vesting requirements of ERISA. Ther...

Read More >

Process Safety Management/OSHA Enforcement: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Refinery Cited for Alleged Violations

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) issued a January 17th news release stat...

Read More >

Draft regulation with provisional simplification of KYC measures for the banking sector in Mexico

On Sunday June 21, 2020, the Mexican Banking and Securities Commission ("CNBV") ?in charge of the an...

Read More >

FTC Revises Hart-Scott-Rodino Thresholds for 2021

On February 2, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission announced revised notification thresholds pursuant...

Read More >

You’re Rehired? New California Law Prohibits No-Rehire Provisions in Settlement Agreements

Upending the longstanding practice of employers including no-rehire clauses in agreements resolving ...

Read More >