X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

First Circuit Appeals Court Reverses Finding of Controlled Group Pension Liability Due to ‘Partnership in Fact’

The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently reversed a prior decision of the US District ...

Read More >

Whew! Fifth Circuit Reinforces Importance of Documenting Performance Issues

Seyfarth Synopsis: In affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendant in an Family and Medical ...

Read More >

A summer of planning reforms - the best of the rest

Whilst the three previous articles in our series on planning reform have considered the main changes...

Read More >

Do You “Like” Me? Are We “Friends”? A Social Media Update For Employers

Every company has faced challenges related to the social media presence of, or use by, prospective a...

Read More >

Federal Court Rules that the FAA Preempts New York Law Prohibiting Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims

In response to the #MeToo movement, New York State has led the way in enacting legislation to expand...

Read More >

Coronavirus and force majeure: Can we exit construction contracts affected by COVID-19?

Let's dispel some myths. Force majeure clauses do not always relieve a party of its obligations. Not...

Read More >