13May
Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement
In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By:
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Related
On June 26, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Mahmoud Latif v. ...
Read More >
There’s some surprise market wheeling and dealing afoot this morning. The Hong Kong stock exchange ...
Read More >
In a wrongful death suit by a Massachusetts wife of a man and their child who drowned in a Montreal ...
Read More >
On the heels of a new federal law requiring certain public federal buildings to provide lactation sp...
Read More >
About this time last year, research from George Washington University and University of Utah found a...
Read More >
In Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v. M.A.P. Mech. Contractors, Inc., 2020 WL 3527909 (Mich. June 29, 2020), ...
Read More >