13May
Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement
In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By:
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/
Related
The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently reversed a prior decision of the US District ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendant in an Family and Medical ...
Read More >
Whilst the three previous articles in our series on planning reform have considered the main changes...
Read More >
Every company has faced challenges related to the social media presence of, or use by, prospective a...
Read More >
In response to the #MeToo movement, New York State has led the way in enacting legislation to expand...
Read More >
Let's dispel some myths. Force majeure clauses do not always relieve a party of its obligations. Not...
Read More >