X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

“High” Court Time: N.J. Supreme Court Agrees to Review Ruling on Off-Duty Medical Marijuana Use as Reasonable Accommodation

On July 9, 2019, the New Jersey Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving whether an employee ca...

Read More >

M&A Watch: New Regulations Significantly Expand CFIUS Reach

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) last week added considerable teeth ...

Read More >

DHS commences pilot project to collect DNA from certain travellers

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently announced a pilot project to collect DNA samples ...

Read More >

Modernizing EU Competition Policy: Will the EU's Angst with Chinese State-Owned Companies Help U.S. Tech Firms off the European Commission's Hook?

During her five-year term as European commissioner for competition, Margrethe Vestager has earned a ...

Read More >

What is a "Day" When it Comes to Personal/Carers' Leave?

The Full Court of the Federal Court has handed down its decision in the matter of Mondelez Australia...

Read More >