X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

New Bay Area COVID-19 Orders Ease Restrictions on Construction and Impose New Safety Protocols

In an earlier post, we covered the local Shelter-in-Place (“SIP”) orders, which severely restricte...

Read More >

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: First Circuit Clarifies ERISA's Timing Requirements for Appealing Adverse Benefits Determination

In Fortier v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 916 F.3d 74 (1st Cir. 2019) the U.S. Court of Appea...

Read More >

Minimum Wage Increases And Other New Year Reminders For New York Employers-Updated

As we approach the end of the year, it is critical to remember and implement some of the new legal r...

Read More >

IRS Finalizes Hardship Distribution Regulations For Qualified Retirement Plans

Earlier this year, we summarized proposed Treasury regulations and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018...

Read More >

November 2019 Visa Bulletin Update

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that it will once again use the Date...

Read More >

NZ$3 billion for construction: is it enough to keep everyone working?

There were some significant announcements for the construction sector in Budget 2020: NZ$3 billion i...

Read More >