X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

[Video] Startup Compensation: Tips to Avoid Liability and Keep Your Investors Happy

There are many ways to run afoul of labor laws and spook your investors—one of the most common for ...

Read More >

Labor Board: Misclassifying Worker As Independent Contractor Does Not Violate NLRA

It does not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) if an employer mistakenly misclassifies ...

Read More >

District Court Preliminarily Enjoins Enforcement of California’s A.B. 51 Anti-Arbitration Law

Since Oct. 11, 2019, we have been blogging about California’s new anti-arbitration law and the inju...

Read More >

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Issues Unanimous Decision Vacating Fall Protection Citation

Unanimous decisions from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Commission are rare, but on July 11, 201...

Read More >

New Legislation Includes Employee Benefits Changes: Why M&A Practitioners Should ‘CARE’

Financial assistance and other relief provided to employers under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and E...

Read More >