X
13May

Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement

In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By: Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/letters-exchanged-between-developer-and-17840/

Related

Financial Daily Dose 7.29.2019 | Top Story: Pfizer and Mylan Join Forces to Create Generics Powerhouse

Drug giants Pfizer and Mylan have inked a deal that will merge the former’s off-patent drugs with t...

Read More >

The New Year Brings New Guidance on FLSA Issues from the U.S. Department of Labor

In its first installment of opinions letters in 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour ...

Read More >

PA Appellate Court Strikes Down Project Labor Agreement for First Time—Saves Taxpayers Millions

PennDOT recently awarded the second phase of a local state highway improvement project to Allan Myer...

Read More >

New Mobility Public-Private Partnerships May Address Transportation Gaps in the Future

A few weeks ago, I had the privilege of again attending CoMotion LA. Spearheaded by John Rossant, C...

Read More >

Insufficient Investigation Allows Lawsuit to Proceed

In recent years male students who were removed from school following a Title IX investigation have s...

Read More >