13May
Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement
In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By:
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Related
On Thursday, November 7, 2019, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) held the second ...
Read More >
December 2019 brought significant changes to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) case law and ...
Read More >
In Vet4U, LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals awarded cost...
Read More >
In the recent decision Newton v. Morgantown Machine & Hydraulics, the Supreme Court of Appeals of We...
Read More >
This alert is the third installment in our series on Illinois’ new anti-harassment legislation, SB7...
Read More >
It seems that it is impossible to talk to any fund today without learning that a SPAC is planned or ...
Read More >