13May
Letters Exchanged Between Developer and Architectural Review Board Insufficient to Constitute Enforceable Settlement Agreement
In Matter of Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC v Village of Pittsford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, et al., the Fourth Department held that settlement correspondence between a development firm, Pittsford Canalside Properties, LLC (“PCP” or “Petitioner”), and...
By:
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Related
In a recent decision, Marshall v. Montaplast of North America, Inc., the Supreme Court of Kentucky r...
Read More >
A plan’s definition of “compensation” tends to be one of the trickier aspects of 401(k) administr...
Read More >
Tsatsi v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKCA 53, held that a physician’s ...
Read More >
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") recently adopted amendments to Regulation S-X and...
Read More >
Most professional liability polices include some form of a “related claims” provision that general...
Read More >
• Amendments to the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) lower the bar for employees and indivi...
Read More >