X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

Electronic Signatures in the Age of COVID-19

The outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19), with its social distancing and remote work protocols, ha...

Read More >

U.S. DOL Announces Proposed New Rule on Tip Credits and Pooling

Rules relating to tip credit and pooling have resulted in significant debate among legislators, regu...

Read More >

Federal Court Extends Order Barring California From Enforcing New Anti-Employment-Arbitration Law

A federal judge in Sacramento has continued an order that temporarily bars the State of California f...

Read More >

Frozen 2: IRS Expands Nondiscrimination Relief for Frozen Defined Benefit Pension Plans

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) expanded the temporary relief for frozen defined benefit plans to...

Read More >

The Need for Cybersecurity and Privacy Due Diligence in M&A Transaction

The Need for Cyber Due Diligence in M&A Transactions - As technology continues to advance, allowing...

Read More >

Traps for the Unwary: Code Section 410(b) Coverage Testing Concerns in Transactions

With a recent uptick in mergers and transactions, we thought it would be worthwhile to provide a ref...

Read More >