X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

Weekly Update Newsletter - February 2020

CLIENT ALERT: CMMC Is Coming: Are You Ready? PilieroMazza previously blogged regarding the draft re...

Read More >

Pennsylvania Governor Paves Way to Reopen Construction on May 1

On April 20, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf amended his March 19, 2020 Order Regarding the Closure of Al...

Read More >

Surprise! Section 901(m) final regulations

Surprisingly, in the midst of the COVID-19 emergency, final regulations under Section 901(m) were pu...

Read More >

Governor Vetoes Restaurant Bill; General Assembly May Move to Override

Late Friday, Governor Lamont vetoed House Bill 5001, which I had highlighted in an earlier post as b...

Read More >

Does California’s Ban on Non-Competes Apply to Business Agreements? The California Supreme Court May Weigh In Shortly.

The Ninth Circuit recently certified a question to the California Supreme Court regarding the scope ...

Read More >

Creative Legislative Solutions to Bond off Mechanic’s Liens - Construction and Procurement Law News, Q2 2019

Whether you are the owner or the general contractor, dealing with mechanic’s liens filed by subcont...

Read More >