X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

The Rising Tide of Global Whistleblower Regulations

The whistleblowing landscape has changed substantially over the past few years. High profile cases h...

Read More >

Blog: 10 Key Considerations for Going Public with a SPAC

It is a reasonable extrapolation – and we are nothing at Cooley if not wildly reasonable – that mo...

Read More >

Noncompete Reform Continues in New England: Maine, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island All Pass New Laws

Noncompete reform continues to crop up in New England. We previously wrote about comprehensive refor...

Read More >

South Carolina Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act Set-Offs: When They Must Be Made

The South Carolina Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (the Act), as we now know it, is nearing the f...

Read More >

Copyright in construction: some common queries

Questions about intellectual property rights routinely arise during construction contract negotiatio...

Read More >

U.S. District Court Rules in Favor of Airline Flight Crew Employees on Paid Sick Leave Challenge

On October 11, 2019, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washing...

Read More >