X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

Lenders’ views on documentation diverge under lockdown

The decline in H1 2020 leveraged finance issuance has seen some lenders intensify their focus on pri...

Read More >

Employer Alert - Coronavirus Travel Restrictions Update

On February 2, 2020, the United States joined a growing list of countries that have implemented trav...

Read More >

Massachusetts COVID-19 Response: Governor Baker Issues Guidance for Construction as “Essential Services”

Governor Baker’s office issued a guidance letter on March 25, 2020 in an attempt to resolve confusi...

Read More >

UPDATE: NCAA Flexes Its Muscle In Response To California Fair Pay To Play Act

NCAA President Mark Emmert has predicted that it would become “impossible” for the NCAA to conside...

Read More >

Navajo Transitional Energy Company to Purchase Wyoming Coal Mines

Navajo Transitional Energy Company, a wholly owned limited liability company of the Navajo Nation, i...

Read More >

Employer That “Mistakenly” Terminated Employee On Disability Leave May Be Liable For Discrimination

Glynn v. Superior Court, 42 Cal. App. 5th 47 (2019) - John Glynn worked as a pharmaceutical sales ...

Read More >