X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

New HSR Reporting Thresholds Announced for 2020

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR) requires parties to transactions meet...

Read More >

Preregistration Process Brings Revamp and Uncertainty to H-1B Visa Program

U.S. employers wanting to hire foreign professionals should identify those eligible for H-1B sponsor...

Read More >

Three months, three budgets: Singapore's response to COVID-19 from a tax perspective

The Singaporean response to the COVID-19 outbreak has been comprehensive and coordinated. The 18 Feb...

Read More >

Dear YouDig? Manage Up the Nowhere Man

Dear YouDig?, When we say we have a project team, we mean it. We seek input from all of our project...

Read More >

Good news for the Macron grid: The Paris Court of Appeal follows in the footsteps of the French Supreme Court

Following the ruling of the Supreme Court on 17 July 2019, the Paris Court of Appeal, by a judgment ...

Read More >

Court Rejects Delaware Choice Of Law Provision In Refusing To Enforce Customer Non-Solicitation Covenant Against California Employee

On August 26, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court invalidated a California employee’s customer and em...

Read More >