X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

It’s Official: Newsom Expands The Definition of “Employee” Under California Law

On September 18 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law AB-5, which codified the California Supr...

Read More >

PNG public health law and employer obligations concerning the coronavirus

The coronavirus, which originated in the Chinese city of Wuhan, has caused significant consternation...

Read More >

DDTC issues FAQs on defense services provided by U.S. persons abroad

On 6 January 2020, the State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) issued new fr...

Read More >

An Update On Pay Gap Shareholder Proposals

For nearly five years, major U.S. corporations have been subject to intense scrutiny over their deci...

Read More >

Employer Action Required To Comply With Minnesota Hands-Free Cellphone Law

Employment Law attorneys Mark Pihart, Laura Pfeiffer and Rachel Brygger discuss details of Minnesota...

Read More >

New General Contractor Continuing Education Requirements in North Carolina

It’s official. New legislation requiring North Carolina general contractors to fulfill annual conti...

Read More >