X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Illinois Amends Recreational Cannabis Law To Protect Drug Testing By Employers

Earlier this month, Governor Pritzker signed into law SB 1557, revising the Recreational Cannabis La...

Read More >

2020 New York Employment Law Update - New York Updates Wage and Hour, Discrimination and Salary History Employment Laws

As outlined in our prior alert, a multitude of changes in New York employment law have either gone i...

Read More >

Third Circuit Decision Threatens Rideshare Company’s Right to Arbitrate

The Third Circuit recently opened the door to exempting Uber drivers from the Federal Arbitration Ac...

Read More >

EEO-1 Pay Data Collection Is "Complete"

But it depends on what your definition of "complete" is. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commissio...

Read More >

Fall Regulatory Agenda Indicates DOL Wage and Hour Division is Working on Seven Regulatory Priorities

The U.S. Department of Labor issued its bi-annual regulatory agenda update on November 20, 2019.  Of...

Read More >

Cause of Action Before an Adverse Judgment

Construction Systems provided labor and material for a building project.  When the owner of the proj...

Read More >