X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

[Virtual Event] 2021 J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference - Healthcare Private Equity (PE) Leaders Forum - January 12th, 12:00 pm - 2:15 pm EST

You won’t want to miss four days of exclusive, virtual events that bring together industry leaders,...

Read More >

AMI Mechanical to Pay $82,500 to Settle EEOC National Origin, Color and Retaliation Lawsuit

Plumbing Company Subjected Latino Employees to Hostile and Segregated Working Environment as Well as...

Read More >

Financial Daily Dose 9.17.2020 | Top Story: Fed Pledges to Hold Rates Near Zero Into 2023; Markets Rattled

The Fed sought to reassure markets for the foreseeable future on Wednesday by announcing that it pla...

Read More >

Sanofi to Acquire Kymab for up to $1.45 Billion

Sanofi announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Kymab, a clinical-stage biopharmac...

Read More >

Global M&A insights Q4 2020

Overview - This report looks at how Joe Biden’s election will impact U.S. and global transactions,...

Read More >