X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

The October 2, 2020 SBA Procedural Notice: Change of Ownership Transactions Involving PPP Borrowers

On October 2, 2020, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) released a Procedural Notice provid...

Read More >

Japanese Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act: Important Considerations for Venture Capital and Private Equity

On June 7, the amended ordinances (the “Amended Ordinances”) prepared by the Japanese government t...

Read More >

Agreeing With A Competitor To Fix Employee Wages Will Get You Indicted. Agreeing Not To Solicit Each Other’s Employees Might Also.

Within the past month, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (the Division), in two separate ...

Read More >

Healthy Workplace Discussions of Diversity, Part 3 – Acknowledging and Addressing Unconscious Bias

Work was quiet on a particular summer afternoon way back when, when I was an associate in a big law ...

Read More >

DOJ Updates Corporate Compliance Evaluation Guidance: New Refinements Stress that Programs Need to be 'Empowered to Function Effectively'

The US Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) Criminal Division published an update on June 1 to its Eval...

Read More >

Private Equity Purchasers and SPACs May Be "Preferred" Divestiture Buyers under New DOJ Guidelines for Merger Remedies

What happened? On September 3, 2020, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued a revised Merger Re...

Read More >