04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
A takeover of a French company carrying on so-called ‘sensitive’ activity in France by a company u...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: • Don’t buy a used franchise from Subway. (NYT) • ...
Read More >
Over the past several weeks, the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has upended the marketplace and impose...
Read More >
Split along partisan lines, the Federal Trade Commission (Commission) voted last week to issue Comme...
Read More >
On May 21, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced rule and form amendments that will...
Read More >
The Employee Benefits Practice is pleased to present the Employee Benefits Developments Newsletter f...
Read More >