04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
On October 2, 2020, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) released a Procedural Notice provid...
Read More >
On June 7, the amended ordinances (the “Amended Ordinances”) prepared by the Japanese government t...
Read More >
Within the past month, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (the Division), in two separate ...
Read More >
Work was quiet on a particular summer afternoon way back when, when I was an associate in a big law ...
Read More >
The US Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) Criminal Division published an update on June 1 to its Eval...
Read More >
What happened? On September 3, 2020, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued a revised Merger Re...
Read More >