04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Whether a wrongfully dismissed employee is entitled to damages as compensation for the value of ince...
Read More >
A precedent-setting criminal prosecution of two California executives under the Consumer Product Saf...
Read More >
Seeking to piggyback on the State of Emergency Governor Gavin Newsom declared on March 4, 2020 as pa...
Read More >
Having recently helped a client determine if it employed on average more than 50 employees per month...
Read More >
Supreme Court Declines to Weigh In on Website Accessibility - In a closely watched case that many h...
Read More >
Yet now, federated along one keel… MOBY DICK, HERMAN MELVILLE, Chap. XXVII - In the wake of Justic...
Read More >