04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
The Seventh District Court of Appeals’ decision in Union Local School District v. Grae-Con Construc...
Read More >
On April 1, Nossaman’s Eminent Domain Group hosted a webinar to discuss the impacts COVID-19 is hav...
Read More >
Long after expiration of OMB's authorization for the most recent Form I-9, USCIS has published a new...
Read More >
UPDATE: On December 29, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued ...
Read More >
As Canada takes steps towards economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, the health and safety co...
Read More >
I’m wearing tights today (temps are in the 60s), so that must mean it might be time for the annual ...
Read More >