04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: Over the last few years, Illinois companies have quickly become aware of the risk...
Read More >
On December 8, 2020, a federal court in Pennsylvania rejected a challenge by the Federal Trade Commi...
Read More >
The Gig Economy has caught the attention of at least one presidential candidate who has unveiled a p...
Read More >
In recent months, New York has implemented several changes to its discrimination and sexual ?harassm...
Read More >
On July 17, 2019, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2019-45 to expand the types of p...
Read More >
..Based on the Department of Labor’s Final Rule, the minimum annual salary level for most employees...
Read More >