04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
The National Labor Relations Board just published a final rule that will soon fundamentally alter th...
Read More >
Several municipal clients adopted retiree health savings plans or post-employment health plans, and ...
Read More >
Treasury issued final Opportunity Zone Regulations on December 19, 2019 (“Final Regulations”). Th...
Read More >
On 23 October 2019, a new directive of the European Parliament and the Council of the EU on the prot...
Read More >
Welcome to the fall edition of the BakerHostetler Quarterly New York Employment Law Newsletter. We a...
Read More >
We are now a good three months into the chaos brought about by COVID-19 and while many middle- and l...
Read More >