04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Governments all over the world are continuing to take steps to strengthen their powers to intervene ...
Read More >
The Small Business Administration (SBA) issued a Procedural Notice on October 2, 2020, detailing re...
Read More >
On June 30, 2020, in an en banc opinion authored by Justice Karen L. Valihura, the Supreme Court of ...
Read More >
Employers may be surprised to learn that the Republican-controlled National Labor Relations Board ju...
Read More >
In Penn-America Insurance Company v. Bay State Gas Company, 96 Mass. App. Ct. 757 (2019), the Appeal...
Read More >
The 2019 TRC Transportation Conference and Equipment Expo was held this week in Hot Springs, Arkansa...
Read More >