04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
The annual gathering of life sciences executives and investors in San Francisco that many now call “...
Read More >
The Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) created under the CARES Act has provided much needed a...
Read More >
In the first case following Akorn v. Fresenius to rule on a party’s entitlement to terminate a merg...
Read More >
Residents and employers along the Gulf of Mexico are watching carefully as Tropical Storm Barry appr...
Read More >
With the situation surrounding the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) rapidly changing, multinational...
Read More >
Trucking Company Uses a Strength Test That Discriminates Against Women Truck Drivers, Federal Agency...
Read More >