04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California has granted a request for a prelimina...
Read More >
In the past 35 years, it changed on who had to take out a required minimum distribution (RMD) from a...
Read More >
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS & ADVISORY SERVICES - CLIENT ALERT: SBA to Increase Size Standards with In...
Read More >
As summarized in our January 7 Client Advisory, the SECURE Act includes many changes that affect the...
Read More >
The act amending the Act on the National Housing Resources was signed by the President on 2 July 201...
Read More >
Connecticut has followed a growing trend among the states by implementing a system to provide paid t...
Read More >