04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
During the rise of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, OSHA provided standards for recording...
Read More >
On June 28, 2019, Governor Mills signed LD 733, An Act To Promote Keeping Workers in Maine, into law...
Read More >
Private construction projects in New York will become subject to new prevailing wage requirements pu...
Read More >
Employers are usually advised to exercise extreme caution where an employee's religion or beliefs ar...
Read More >
Last September, Makan Delrahim, the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the Dep...
Read More >
Precision Hydraulic Cylinders, Inc. v. Manufacturing. Technology, Inc., No. 7:18-CV-203-FL, 2019 BL ...
Read More >