X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Is national security a game changer for European foreign investment reviews and M&A transactions?

Governments all over the world are continuing to take steps to strengthen their powers to intervene ...

Read More >

The PPP Meets M&A: Pitfalls For The Unwary Borrower and Lender

The Small Business Administration (SBA) issued a Procedural Notice  on October 2, 2020, detailing re...

Read More >

Delaware Supreme Court Reverses Dismissal Of Merger-Related Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claims Regarding Allegedly Undisclosed Conflict Of Interest

On June 30, 2020, in an en banc opinion authored by Justice Karen L. Valihura, the Supreme Court of ...

Read More >

Time To Revisit Arbitration Agreements: Employers Dealt A Blow By Unanimous Labor Board

Employers may be surprised to learn that the Republican-controlled National Labor Relations Board ju...

Read More >

Massachusetts Court Holds Statute of Repose Does Not Apply to Claims for Failure to Maintain Property

In Penn-America Insurance Company v. Bay State Gas Company, 96 Mass. App. Ct. 757 (2019), the Appeal...

Read More >

2019 TRC Transportation Conference Presentation: Environmental Legal Concerns for P3s Projects in Arkansas

The 2019 TRC Transportation Conference and Equipment Expo was held this week in Hot Springs, Arkansa...

Read More >