04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) published two final rules on Januar...
Read More >
Employers should continue to exercise caution and care in drafting their criminal record screening p...
Read More >
Due to the developing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has implem...
Read More >
The Situation: The new PRC Foreign Investment Law ("FIL"), as well as its Implementing Regulations (...
Read More >
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) eliminated the 50% deduction for any expenses related ...
Read More >
The California worker classification bill, Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), advanced closer to passage just p...
Read More >