04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
The COVID-19 pandemic is impacting every facet of the economy, including commercial construction and...
Read More >
Often times, the first question asked by employment-based Green Card beneficiaries during an initial...
Read More >
The beauty of the retirement plan business is that it’s constantly changing, the bad part of it is ...
Read More >
A Time of Change - We are in a period of immense change in the legal world as we experience: (i) a f...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Employers are grappling with the wave of marijuana laws sweeping the nation, some...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Recently the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill with bipartisan support ...
Read More >