04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Earlier this month, Governor Pritzker signed into law SB 1557, revising the Recreational Cannabis La...
Read More >
As outlined in our prior alert, a multitude of changes in New York employment law have either gone i...
Read More >
The Third Circuit recently opened the door to exempting Uber drivers from the Federal Arbitration Ac...
Read More >
But it depends on what your definition of "complete" is. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commissio...
Read More >
The U.S. Department of Labor issued its bi-annual regulatory agenda update on November 20, 2019. Of...
Read More >
Construction Systems provided labor and material for a building project. When the owner of the proj...
Read More >