X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

DOJ Brings First-Ever Criminal Prosecution Of Executives For Failing To Report Dangerous Product Defects

A precedent-setting criminal prosecution of two California executives under the Consumer Product Saf...

Read More >

What to Do if Your Company is Close to the Affordable Care Act's 50 Full-time Employee Threshold

Having recently helped a client determine if it employed on average more than 50 employees per month...

Read More >

Retail and Consumer Products Law Roundup - October 2019

Supreme Court Declines to Weigh In on Website Accessibility - In a closely watched case that many h...

Read More >