X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Ohio Court of Appeals Applies Supreme Court’s New Riegel Decision; Rejects School District’s “Accrual” Argument To Resurrect Claims

The Seventh District Court of Appeals’ decision in Union Local School District v. Grae-Con Construc...

Read More >

Right of Way Professionals Opine on COVID-19 Impacts to the Profession

On April 1, Nossaman’s Eminent Domain Group hosted a webinar to discuss the impacts COVID-19 is hav...

Read More >

New Version of Form I-9 Required for Use by May 1st

Long after expiration of OMB's authorization for the most recent Form I-9, USCIS has published a new...

Read More >

California’s New Anti-Arbitration Law Temporarily Enjoined by Federal Court

UPDATE: On December 29, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued ...

Read More >

Green Buildings in the Economic Recovery

As Canada takes steps towards economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, the health and safety co...

Read More >

Florida’s Minimum Wage Rate Will Rise By Ten Cents In 2020

I’m wearing tights today (temps are in the 60s), so that must mean it might be time for the annual ...

Read More >