X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Is There Anything Improper About Taking a Vacation During FMLA Leave?

While posting vacation photos on Facebook during a leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FML...

Read More >

Use It or Lose It: SCOTUS holds that EEOC Charge-Filing Requirement Is Forfeited If Not Timely Asserted

On June 3, 2019, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Fort Bend County, Texas v. D...

Read More >

IRS Adopts Final Regulations With Required and Optional Changes to Hardship Distribution Rules for 401(k) and 403(b) Plans

Most Employers Need to Make Plan Document and Administrative Changes - In late 2018, the Internal R...

Read More >

The Relationship Talk: DOL Issues New Rules on Joint Employer Status

When do your business relationships make you a joint employer? Fortunately, the DOL recently publish...

Read More >

In Case You Missed It: Launch Links - January 2020 #2

Some interesting links we found across the web this week: 10 Predictions for the Tech Industry in 2...

Read More >