X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

FIRRMA Regulations Finalized

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) published two final rules on Januar...

Read More >

Dollar General Reaches Settlement with the EEOC in Years-Long Background Check Bias Suit

Employers should continue to exercise caution and care in drafting their criminal record screening p...

Read More >

FTC Implements Temporary Hart-Scott-Rodino E-Filing System, Suspends Early Termination Program

Due to the developing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has implem...

Read More >

China Further Opens its Market with New "Foreign Investment Law"

The Situation: The new PRC Foreign Investment Law ("FIL"), as well as its Implementing Regulations (...

Read More >

IRS Issues Favorable Taxpayer Guidance on Business Meal Deduction

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) eliminated the 50% deduction for any expenses related ...

Read More >

AB 5 Returned To The CA Senate

The California worker classification bill, Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), advanced closer to passage just p...

Read More >