X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

5 Things You Need To Know About The Labor Board’s New Joint Employment Rule

The National Labor Relations Board just published a final rule that will soon fundamentally alter th...

Read More >

Making Sense of Your Retiree Health "Savings" Plan

Several municipal clients adopted retiree health savings plans or post-employment health plans, and ...

Read More >

Polsinelli Commentary on the Final Opportunity Zone Regulations

Treasury issued final Opportunity Zone Regulations on December 19, 2019 (“Final Regulations”).  Th...

Read More >

Recent whistleblowing directive imposes new obligations on companies - Dentons Prague

On 23 October 2019, a new directive of the European Parliament and the Council of the EU on the prot...

Read More >

The BakerHostetler Quarterly New York Employment Law Newsletter - Fall 2019

Welcome to the fall edition of the BakerHostetler Quarterly New York Employment Law Newsletter. We a...

Read More >

M&A Transactions & PPP Eligibility and Forgiveness Considerations

We are now a good three months into the chaos brought about by COVID-19 and while many middle- and l...

Read More >