04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
In California, lien priority is usually resolved by a straightforward examination of the time of cre...
Read More >
In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis—a decis...
Read More >
On July 10, 2019, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation significantly expanding the prot...
Read More >
To combat historical imbalances in pay of women and minorities, New Jersey recently passed a bill am...
Read More >
Not so long ago, in a galaxy not so far, far away, California passed Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which to...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: The role of coaches in Varsity Blues. (WSJ) New heada...
Read More >