04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
On December 18, 2019 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in a 2-1 decision which the co...
Read More >
Senate Bill 1784, which passed both houses of the General Assembly and currently is awaiting the Gov...
Read More >
The decision leaves the door open for buyers to argue that inflexible ordinary course covenants can ...
Read More >
On September 3, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division (the Division) publ...
Read More >
Last week, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released a proposed rule that would remove grad...
Read More >
CYBERSECURITY & DATA PRIVACY - Start Preparing Now for DoD's Upcoming Cybersecurity Maturity Model...
Read More >