X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Court Grants Preliminary Injunction On Enforcement Of California Ban On Employment Arbitration Agreements

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California has granted a request for a prelimina...

Read More >

Make sure RMDs are made

In the past 35 years, it changed on who had to take out a required minimum distribution (RMD) from a...

Read More >

Weekly Update Newsletter- July 2019 #4

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS & ADVISORY SERVICES - CLIENT ALERT: SBA to Increase Size Standards with In...

Read More >

SECURE Act: Change to RMD Trigger Age Should Trigger Your Attention Now

As summarized in our January 7 Client Advisory, the SECURE Act includes many changes that affect the...

Read More >

Changes to perpetual usufruct in the context of the investment process

The act amending the Act on the National Housing Resources was signed by the President on 2 July 201...

Read More >

Major Shift in Connecticut’s Leave Landscape: What Employers Need to Know About the New Connecticut Paid Family and Medical

Connecticut has followed a growing trend among the states by implementing a system to provide paid t...

Read More >