04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
In a direction consistent with 2020, the filing thresholds for the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Impro...
Read More >
This summer, I had the fortune of taking a trip to Europe. The first place I visited was Amsterdam...
Read More >
SPAC transactions present an opportunity for accelerated growth in the AgTech industry, especially i...
Read More >
Last week, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) updated its Manual on Evaluation of Corporate Complia...
Read More >
On June 4, 2019, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law Texas Senate Bill (SB) 1211, which amend...
Read More >
Severance and litigation settlement agreements often include a provision that prohibits one or more ...
Read More >