04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
While posting vacation photos on Facebook during a leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FML...
Read More >
On May 21, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted amendments to the rules that govern ...
Read More >
On June 3, 2019, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Fort Bend County, Texas v. D...
Read More >
Most Employers Need to Make Plan Document and Administrative Changes - In late 2018, the Internal R...
Read More >
When do your business relationships make you a joint employer? Fortunately, the DOL recently publish...
Read More >
Some interesting links we found across the web this week: 10 Predictions for the Tech Industry in 2...
Read More >