X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

The CROWN Act Makes an Oscars Debut: What to Know about California’s Newest Racially Inclusive Workplace Law

In Sunday’s Oscars acceptance speech for the animated short film “Hair Love,” in which an African...

Read More >

Construction 2020: United Kingdom

Foreign pursuit of the local market - If a foreign designer or contractor wanted to set up an oper...

Read More >

Employee Of Private Contractor A Public Employee??

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has held that an employee of a private con...

Read More >

Prince George’s County Poised to Increase ROFR Activities

The Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) of Prince George’s County in Maryland is...

Read More >

Culture Shock: When Two Culturally-Different Enterprises Combine

Client issues often arrive like schools of fish – rapidly and in huge numbers. Sometimes this is th...

Read More >