X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Pensions: What's new this week - November 2019

Welcome to your weekly update from the Allen & Overy Pensions team, bringing you up to speed on the ...

Read More >

Vital Signs: Digital Health Law Update | Summer 2020

Note From the Editors - With this Summer 2020 issue of Vital Signs, we take a moment to again appl...

Read More >

Which Version of Form I-9 Should I Use?

The impending "expiration" of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) clearance on the most rece...

Read More >

IRS Issues Guidance on PPP Loans and the Employee Retention Credit in M&A Transactions

Dealmakers loathe uncertainty. In addition to the challenges of analyzing impacts of COVID-19 on a b...

Read More >

How Much Will AB 5 Really Change California Law?

The answer is not as much as you may think. Much of the recent media coverage of California’s Assem...

Read More >

Increasing Scrutiny of Foreign Investments in the German Healthcare Sector

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed most governments' views on the strategic relevance of the domestic...

Read More >