X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

What OSHA’s New Guidance Means for the Construction Industry

During the rise of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, OSHA provided standards for recording...

Read More >

Maine Governor Restricts Restrictive Covenants

On June 28, 2019, Governor Mills signed LD 733, An Act To Promote Keeping Workers in Maine, into law...

Read More >

New York Law Mandates Prevailing Wage For Private Construction

Private construction projects in New York will become subject to new prevailing wage requirements pu...

Read More >

Employee dismissed for discussing their religious beliefs at work – can it ever be fair?

Employers are usually advised to exercise extreme caution where an employee's religion or beliefs ar...

Read More >

Are Efforts to Speed Up Antitrust Merger Reviews Working?

Last September, Makan Delrahim, the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the Dep...

Read More >

North Carolina Federal District Court Dismisses Tort Claims Based on Same Duty and Breach Alleged in Plaintiff’s Contract Claims

Precision Hydraulic Cylinders, Inc. v. Manufacturing. Technology, Inc., No. 7:18-CV-203-FL, 2019 BL ...

Read More >