X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Biotech & Life Sciences Trends to Consider Following JPM 2020: M&A, Venture Capital and More

The annual gathering of life sciences executives and investors in San Francisco that many now call “...

Read More >

PPP Loans and M&A Transactions: New Guidance from the SBA

The Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) created under the CARES Act has provided much needed a...

Read More >

Delaware Reaffirms High Bar for Establishing a Material Adverse Effect

In the first case following Akorn v. Fresenius to rule on a party’s entitlement to terminate a merg...

Read More >

As the Gulf Coast Waits for Tropical Storm Barry, How Can Employers Prepare?

Residents and employers along the Gulf of Mexico are watching carefully as Tropical Storm Barry appr...

Read More >

Responding to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus: Guidance for Multinational Employers in Hong Kong

With the situation surrounding the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) rapidly changing, multinational...

Read More >

EEOC Sues Stan Koch & Sons Trucking for Sex Discrimination

Trucking Company Uses a Strength Test That Discriminates Against Women Truck Drivers, Federal Agency...

Read More >