04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Employers may be surprised to learn that the Republican-controlled National Labor Relations Board ju...
Read More >
Last year, new California legislation effective January 1, 2019 expanded the mandatory sexual harass...
Read More >
On April 29, 2020, the French Minister of the Economy (the Minister) announced that French foreign i...
Read More >
A nonemployee’s solicitation for charitable or civic causes on an employer’s property is not the e...
Read More >
A federal district court in Texas referred to arbitration a 401(k) plan participant’s ERISA breach ...
Read More >
A common challenge for employers of hourly or nonexempt employees who receive quarterly or annual no...
Read More >