04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
On September 18, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 5, which clarifies when w...
Read More >
The wait is over. Earlier today, June 18, 2019 (and earlier than the July 1, 2019 due date), the Dep...
Read More >
Melody Shan was employed by Sabre GLBL. Shan entered into an employment agreement with Sabre, which ...
Read More >
As previewed in our prior blog post, the recently enacted SECURE Act includes many changes that affe...
Read More >
This quarter’s issue includes summaries and associated court opinions of selected cases principally...
Read More >
On October 30, 2019, Verrill and MassPay held an in-person seminar program on how to build a respect...
Read More >