04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
What is considered compensable travel time pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) is no...
Read More >
In a 3-1 decision, the National Labor Relations Board (Board) in Johnson Controls, Inc., 368 NLRB No...
Read More >
On March 24, the Ohio Department of Transportation released a “Statement Regarding COVID-19 Respons...
Read More >
Ever since defined contribution plans have come to dominate the retirement plan landscape, both plan...
Read More >
Although there is no standard set of measures that a company can implement to guarantee that it will...
Read More >
As we approach the New Year, employers should keep in mind that several updates to the New York Paid...
Read More >