X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Time To Revisit Arbitration Agreements: Employers Dealt A Blow By Unanimous Labor Board

Employers may be surprised to learn that the Republican-controlled National Labor Relations Board ju...

Read More >

California Employers Have Another Year To Comply With New Mandatory Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Requirements

Last year, new California legislation effective January 1, 2019 expanded the mandatory sexual harass...

Read More >

France Moves To Protect Strategic Assets Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

On April 29, 2020, the French Minister of the Economy (the Minister) announced that French foreign i...

Read More >

Access To Private Property: Labor Board Rules Girl Scout Cookies And Union Protesters Are Different

A nonemployee’s solicitation for charitable or civic causes on an employer’s property is not the e...

Read More >

Arbitrator To Decide Whether ERISA Fiduciary Claims Should Be Arbitrated

A federal district court in Texas referred to arbitration a 401(k) plan participant’s ERISA breach ...

Read More >

What the DOL Guidance on Nondiscretionary Bonuses Means for Nonexempt Employees

A common challenge for employers of hourly or nonexempt employees who receive quarterly or annual no...

Read More >