X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Biometric Privacy Class Actions By The Numbers: Analyzing Illinois’ Hottest Class Action Trend

Seyfarth Synopsis: Over the last few years, Illinois companies have quickly become aware of the risk...

Read More >

Federal Court Rejects FTC Challenge to Hospital Merger in Pennsylvania

On December 8, 2020, a federal court in Pennsylvania rejected a challenge by the Federal Trade Commi...

Read More >

Democratic Presidential Contender’s New Plan Calls For Protections For Gig Workers

The Gig Economy has caught the attention of at least one presidential candidate who has unveiled a p...

Read More >

New York Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Law Update: Another Round of New ??Laws Makes the State Most Progressive in the Nation

In recent months, New York has implemented several changes to its discrimination and sexual ?harassm...

Read More >

Treasury Department and IRS Release Guidance on Preventive Care for Chronic Conditions under High Deductible Health Plans

On July 17, 2019, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2019-45 to expand the types of p...

Read More >

DOL Issues Final Rule Increasing Minimum Salary For Overtime Exemptions

..Based on the Department of Labor’s Final Rule, the minimum annual salary level for most employees...

Read More >