X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

FAQs for Employers Following the Passage of California’s New Law on Independent Contractor Misclassification

On September 18, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 5, which clarifies when w...

Read More >

Third Circuit Affirms Arbitration Award for Employee’s Breach of Employment Agreement

Melody Shan was employed by Sabre GLBL. Shan entered into an employment agreement with Sabre, which ...

Read More >

SECURE Act: Considering Implications of Changes to Required Minimum Distribution Rules

As previewed in our prior blog post, the recently enacted SECURE Act includes many changes that affe...

Read More >

Inside the Courts – An Update From Skadden Securities Litigators - August 2020

This quarter’s issue includes summaries and associated court opinions of selected cases principally...

Read More >

Building a Respectful and Inclusive Workplace

On October 30, 2019, Verrill and MassPay held an in-person seminar program on how to build a respect...

Read More >