04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
On Friday, August 9, 2019, Governor Pritzker signed SB 75, as part of a massive overhaul of employme...
Read More >
Construction projects rarely, if ever, go precisely as planned. One of the most common issues govern...
Read More >
The COVID-19 crisis is highlighting pressure points in pending M&A deals that were negotiated before...
Read More >
In 2020, Ohio’s development officials are again awarding grants to fund commercial and industrial d...
Read More >
In This Issue. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) finalized its “Madden fix,” est...
Read More >
Earlier this summer the New York State Senate and Assembly passed a bill aimed to amend the New York...
Read More >