X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Rainbow USA, Inc., to Pay $11,000 to Settle EEOC Pregnancy Discrimination Lawsuit

Specialty Apparel Chain Fired Manager After Learning She Was Pregnant, Agency Charged - NEW ORLEANS...

Read More >

The proposal for a Digital Markets Act in light of the decision making practice of the Commission and of the FCA

In recent years, online platforms have been the subject of numerous investigations by competition au...

Read More >

Weed & Work: As Legalization Spreads, So Does Uncertainty Over Employers’ Duty to Accommodate Marijuana Use

When it comes to marijuana, the legal landscape is changing rapidly. Ten states, including Californi...

Read More >

Financial services: towards digitalisation and consolidation

U.S. financial services sector M&A picked up in the second half of 2020, in line with the wider U.S....

Read More >

[Webinar] M&A Webinar Series: Tax-Free Rollovers in Private Equity Transactions, hosted by Williams Mullen - June 23rd, 11:00 am - 11:15 am EST

Do you often find yourself amid transactions that require a decision to sell a business to a private...

Read More >