X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

EEO-1 Component 2 Report Update

The EEOC has now clarified that it will not seek renewal of its authorization to collect Component 2...

Read More >

Legislative Update: Illinois is the Latest State to Join Nationwide Trend of Salary History Ban Laws

Orrick’s Equal Pay Pulse has been tracking the nationwide wave of salary history bans in recent yea...

Read More >

Washington Restricts Use of Non-Competition Agreements

Earlier this year, Washington adopted a new law—Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1450—that places s...

Read More >

Supreme Court Rules on FOIA and the Protection of Sensitive Company Information

A recent Supreme Court case determined that private commercial and financial information that is tra...

Read More >

A Chart Of All Of California’s State And City Paid Sick Leave Laws

It’s hard work keeping up with all nine of California’s state and municipal Paid Sick Leave Laws. ...

Read More >

Governor Baker's 3-31-20 Order Narrows Definition of Essential Services to Limit Permitted Construction Activities

Pursuant to its update issued March 31, 2020, the Commonwealth has revised the “COVID-19 Essential ...

Read More >