04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The New York State Assembly and Senate have passed a bill that would allow employees to obtain liens...
Read More >
There have been an increasing number of reports that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has b...
Read More >
In the first case following Akorn v. Fresenius to rule on a party’s entitlement to terminate a merg...
Read More >
States across the country continue to enact legislation limiting the use of non-compete agreements. ...
Read More >
A nonemployee’s solicitation for charitable or civic causes on an employer’s property is not the e...
Read More >
A federal appeals court just ruled that workers don’t need to clear a heightened legal standard in ...
Read More >