X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Union’s Goal: 100,000 New Members By 2024

UNITE HERE hopes to increase its membership by one-third, to 400,000 members, by 2024, according to ...

Read More >

California Court Finds Arbitration Agreements Unconscionable

Agreeing with a trial court that the arbitration agreements at issue were both procedurally and subs...

Read More >

BLI Northwest & Successor Harris Pacific Northwest to Pay $100,000 and Provide Other Relief to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit

Certified Rigger Fired Due to Epilepsy, Federal Agency Charged - SEATTLE - Bellingham, Wash.-based...

Read More >

Minimising and Mitigating Risk in M&A - Trusted Tools and New Solutions

In a complex and competitive market, minimising and mitigating risk in M&A is a key concern for deal...

Read More >

[Video] Innovation in Compliance-Get Your Book Published with Paul Brodie

Paul Brodie is the CEO of Brodie Consulting. He is a consultant and keynote speaker, and most intere...

Read More >

Nicaragua - Increase in minimum wage for 2020

On February 6, 2020, Nicaraguan Ministry of Labor issued the Ministerial Agreement number ALTB-01-02...

Read More >