X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Illinois “Stay-at-Home” Order Permits Many Categories of Construction to Continue

On March 20, 2020, Governor of Illinois JB Pritzker, issued an executive order requiring Illinois re...

Read More >

National Labor Relations Board Reverses Two Key Obama-Era Precedents

Last month, the National Labor Relations Board continued its recent pattern of reversing controversi...

Read More >

UPDATE: Massachusetts Paid Family and Medical Leave Employer Deadlines

Notice to employees due September 30, and required contribution withholding begins October 1. Massa...

Read More >

M&A HSR Premerger Notification Thresholds Increase in 2020

The new minimum HSR threshold is $94 million and applies to transactions closing on or after Februar...

Read More >

[Video] The Science of Star Trek-Tomorrow is Yesterday and Black Holes, White Holes, and Wormholes

Welcome to the Science of Star Trek, a podcast series inspired by my review of Star Trek, the Origin...

Read More >

Financial Daily Dose 3.18.2020 | Top Story: Markets Gain on Stimulus Promise as Volatility Rules

Volatility’s the name of the game these days on Wall Street. So what was down on Monday was up (a b...

Read More >