04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
As the COVID-19 pandemic has raged on, financial institutions and banks have withstood its effects a...
Read More >
If you are scrambling to comply with the new California sexual harassment training requirements, we ...
Read More >
In the first episode of this multi-part series, Kevin Bland and Karen Tynan cover key information fo...
Read More >
Legal challenges threaten to take the right to gain employment in the U.S. away from H-4 visa holder...
Read More >
On August 30, 2019, Governor Newsom signed into law SB 778, which delays by one year the new harassm...
Read More >
How does Fahrenheit 451 foretell non-compliance regulation in Germany? Tom and Jay brave the surge i...
Read More >