X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Considerations When Supporting and Participating in National Party Conventions

Now that the calendar has flipped to 2020, planning and fundraising efforts are intensifying in adva...

Read More >

Regulatory Considerations for M&A Investors During COVID-19 - Era 3-Part Series: COVID-19’s Impact on US & Indian M&A Markets

The COVID-19 pandemic and the corresponding economic volatility has dramatically impacted the US and...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - Canada - Q2 2019

Ontario: Amendments to Employment Standards Act and Labour Relations Act - New Legislation Enacted ...

Read More >

HSR Thresholds Revised (and Lowered) and Early Terminations Suspended Pending Review

On February 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced revised notification thresholds fo...

Read More >

Claim that over-the-counter medication caused positive drug test doesn’t reverse termination

An Oklahoma refinery employee who was terminated after testing positive for amphetamines tried to ge...

Read More >

How To Pursue Reps And Warranties Claims

The past decade’s robust mergers and acquisitions volume sparked the rapid growth of representation...

Read More >