04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
The Rhode Island Supreme Court recently held that the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA), a federal law,...
Read More >
As discussed in our previous advisory, covered employers have until September 30, 2019 to comply wit...
Read More >
The Department of Labor (DOL) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on October 8, 2019, t...
Read More >
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is reminding E-Verify users that they wil...
Read More >
In its decision, the Court concluded that UnitedHealth Group, Inc. (“United”) was not authorized t...
Read More >
Following Governor Cuomo’s order and the Empire State Development (ESD) guidance on March 27, 2020,...
Read More >