04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
On 26 June 2020, the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (Act) came into force with changes...
Read More >
Asset management firms and hedge funds regularly employ the very best financial and quantitative ana...
Read More >
The New Jersey test for independent contractor status under the unemployment laws is already very to...
Read More >
In this article, we follow up on our overview of going private transactions (available here) by focu...
Read More >
Because many hotels and resorts hold Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses for the wi...
Read More >
• A recent amendment to the Illinois Equal Pay Act generally prohibits employers inquiring about a ...
Read More >