04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
The EEOC has now clarified that it will not seek renewal of its authorization to collect Component 2...
Read More >
Orrick’s Equal Pay Pulse has been tracking the nationwide wave of salary history bans in recent yea...
Read More >
Earlier this year, Washington adopted a new law—Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1450—that places s...
Read More >
A recent Supreme Court case determined that private commercial and financial information that is tra...
Read More >
It’s hard work keeping up with all nine of California’s state and municipal Paid Sick Leave Laws. ...
Read More >
Pursuant to its update issued March 31, 2020, the Commonwealth has revised the “COVID-19 Essential ...
Read More >