X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

DOL Proposed NEW Electronic Disclosures Rule

Employers frustrated with the cumbersome rules and added expenses for furnishing plan documents, sum...

Read More >

Pensions Newsletter – October 2019

Welcome to the 25th issue of the Blakes Pensions Newsletter. This newsletter provides a summary of r...

Read More >

National Labor Relations Board Reopens Rules Related to Union Activity

The National Labor Relations Board continues its efforts to revisit earlier decisions that expanded ...

Read More >

A Lesson for Employers: The Obligation to Pay H-1B Workers May Begin Even Before the H-1B Petition is Approved

An IT consulting company based in Southern California recently paid $48,193 to one employee after th...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - Canada - Q3 2019

With some Canada Labour Code (CLC) amendments in Bill C-44, the Budget Implementation Act, 2017, No....

Read More >

Premium Processing Service - Available at an Increasingly Premium Price: What are a U.S. Employer’s Options?

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has published a final rule increasing...

Read More >