04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
This quarter’s issue includes summaries and associated court opinions of selected cases principally...
Read More >
On July 21, 2020, the Huntington Town Board adopted significant amendments to the Town’s zoning and...
Read More >
Undoubtedly, 2019 has been a year of change for Illinois employers, as businesses grapple with new m...
Read More >
On October 10, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law a new bill (AB 51) that will have a subst...
Read More >
Join us for the 12th annual “Selecting Project Delivery Methods & Bidding Public Construction Contr...
Read More >
Mandatory arbitration agreements in employment have been granted a stay of execution. For now. Earli...
Read More >