04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Think of how many tasks you can accomplish using company websites and apps. For any Ravens fan – yo...
Read More >
After much anticipation, on September 24, 2019 the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final ...
Read More >
As the recent Coronavirus outbreak continues, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) h...
Read More >
Managing an employee who is struggling with alcoholism or substance use disorder can be challenging ...
Read More >
As discussed in our prior article, California recently enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 51, a law that att...
Read More >
The long-awaited modernization of German securities law has begun! Two Germany ministries have joint...
Read More >