04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Previously, on a reopener of a permanent partial total disability case that turned into a permanent ...
Read More >
• The New York State Equal Pay Act (EPA) now will apply to all protected categories (including race...
Read More >
The Boston Planning and Development Agency (“BPDA”) has approved an amendment to the Boston Zoning...
Read More >
The California Court of Appeal recently discussed an owner's remedies (and some limits to those reme...
Read More >
Last Friday, I had the opportunity to talk about Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace at the CBI...
Read More >
During the M&A cycle, we observe that the likelihood of value creation for the acquirer and emerging...
Read More >