04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
On March 20, 2020, Governor of Illinois JB Pritzker, issued an executive order requiring Illinois re...
Read More >
Last month, the National Labor Relations Board continued its recent pattern of reversing controversi...
Read More >
Notice to employees due September 30, and required contribution withholding begins October 1. Massa...
Read More >
The new minimum HSR threshold is $94 million and applies to transactions closing on or after Februar...
Read More >
Welcome to the Science of Star Trek, a podcast series inspired by my review of Star Trek, the Origin...
Read More >
Volatility’s the name of the game these days on Wall Street. So what was down on Monday was up (a b...
Read More >