X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Friendlier Skies in Rhode Island: Sunday & Holiday Premium Pay Law Held Preempted for Airlines

The Rhode Island Supreme Court recently held that the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA), a federal law,...

Read More >

EEOC Declines to Renew Employers’ Obligation to Report Pay Data Past September

As discussed in our previous advisory, covered employers have until September 30, 2019 to comply wit...

Read More >

DOL Proposes FLSA Regulations To Close Door On ‘80/20’ Rule, Implement Tip Pooling Amendments

The Department of Labor (DOL) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on October 8, 2019, t...

Read More >

E-Verify Records Purge

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is reminding E-Verify users that they wil...

Read More >

New York Clarifies “Emergency” and “Essential” Construction

Following Governor Cuomo’s order and the Empire State Development (ESD) guidance on March 27, 2020,...

Read More >