04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
The Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (“MCEQ”) and Little Bluff, LLC, (“Little Bluf...
Read More >
Many written employment agreements contain automatic renewal provisions that apply at the end of the...
Read More >
On September 30, 2019, Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard of the Delaware Court of Chancery denied defenda...
Read More >
The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (collectively, “Agencies”) recentl...
Read More >
On June 24, John Elias, a former Acting Chief of Staff to the United States Assistant Attorney Gener...
Read More >
Those who believed the Trump administration would scale back the Obama-era Department of Labor’s (D...
Read More >