04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespo...
Read More >
Have you ever wondered when Massachusetts’ 6-year statute of repose for defective design, planning ...
Read More >
Key Takeaways The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), with the support of the Antitrust Division of the ...
Read More >
The Setting Every Community Up For Retirement Enhancement (“SECURE”) Act, which was enacted into l...
Read More >
Global financial markets have experienced unprecedented volatility as heightened concerns about the ...
Read More >
For the fifth consecutive year, the Bass, Berry & Sims Healthcare Private Equity Team hosted BBS Con...
Read More >