04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Hospital Unlawfully Refused Reasonable Accommodation for Religious Belief and Rescinded Job Offer, F...
Read More >
The New York State Department of Labor, after holding multiple hearings across the state regarding t...
Read More >
Our Antitrust and M&A Groups analyze this year’s Federal Trade Commission decreases to its threshol...
Read More >
Non-Profit Medical Institution Subjected Employee to Illegal Medical Examinations and Fired Her in V...
Read More >
An employee sued her former employer alleging that she was unlawfully terminated under federal law. ...
Read More >
Top Tidjane Thiam ally Pierre-Olivier Bouee, Credit Suisse’s COO, has resigned in the wake of an in...
Read More >