X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Is Your Website Accessible to Customers With Disabilities and Why You Should Care!

Think of how many tasks you can accomplish using company websites and apps. For any Ravens fan – yo...

Read More >

Update: DOL Issues Final Rule Regarding Changes to Salary Threshold for Exempt White-Collar Employees

After much anticipation, on September 24, 2019 the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final ...

Read More >

CDC Releases Guidance for Employers Regarding the Coronavirus

As the recent Coronavirus outbreak continues, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) h...

Read More >

Are Employees with Alcoholism and Substance Use Disorder Protected under the ADAAA?

Managing an employee who is struggling with alcoholism or substance use disorder can be challenging ...

Read More >

AB 51 Enjoined at the Last Minute: Court Issues TRO on California’s Arbitration Statute

As discussed in our prior article, California recently enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 51, a law that att...

Read More >

Introduction of Registered Securities, including Crypto Securities, in Germany

The long-awaited modernization of German securities law has begun! Two Germany ministries have joint...

Read More >