X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

EEOC Sues Greensboro Zaxby’s Owner for Sexual Harassment and Retaliation

Female Employee Subjected to Sexual Comments by General Manager, Then Fired Because She Complained, ...

Read More >

Business Recovers Millions in Fees, Expenses, and Costs After Claims by EEOC Found to be "Frivolous"

A district court awarded nearly $4.7 million in fees, expenses, and costs to a trucking business aft...

Read More >

Target and Pro Forma Financial Statement Requirements for Significant Acquisitions

Target and Pro Forma Financial Statement Requirements for Significant Acquisitions - US reporting c...

Read More >

Demotion As Reasonable Accommodation and Responding to Hostile-Work-Environment Claims Under the ADA in Ford V. Marion County Sheriff's Office

In the recently decided case of Ford v. Marion County Sheriff’s Office, the United States Court of ...

Read More >

Industry News Briefs

Happy New Year! Did I Miss My Chance at Opportunity Zones? Opportunity zones were introduced in 201...

Read More >

Australian Company & Securities Update | Issue One

KEY LEGAL AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS - Legislative and Regulatory Reform - Permanent reforms in...

Read More >