04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Female Employee Subjected to Sexual Comments by General Manager, Then Fired Because She Complained, ...
Read More >
A district court awarded nearly $4.7 million in fees, expenses, and costs to a trucking business aft...
Read More >
Target and Pro Forma Financial Statement Requirements for Significant Acquisitions - US reporting c...
Read More >
In the recently decided case of Ford v. Marion County Sheriff’s Office, the United States Court of ...
Read More >
Happy New Year! Did I Miss My Chance at Opportunity Zones? Opportunity zones were introduced in 201...
Read More >
KEY LEGAL AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS - Legislative and Regulatory Reform - Permanent reforms in...
Read More >