X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

New Year, New Forms – Form I-9 Gets a 2020 Update

No job is finished until the paperwork is done, but compliant employers also know that no job is sta...

Read More >

Time To Raise OSHA And MSHA Penalties!

It’s that time of year again! OSHA and MSHA penalties were automatically adjusted this month. What ...

Read More >

OSHA Clarifies Safety Requirements for the Construction Industry and those Performing Work in Occupied Homes During COVID-19

Have you updated your Workplace Safety and Health Program to identify and address the new hazards CO...

Read More >

WealthPRIME has a winner with their software

As an ERISA attorney, I get asked to review new retirement plan tools and plan provider marketing to...

Read More >

What's The Difference Between Wrongful Death And Survival Actions?

If someone dies as the result of a personal injury, the deceased's estate can bring what is called a...

Read More >

FTC and DOJ Issue Final Vertical Merger Guidelines

On June 30, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice Antitrust Division (DOJ) re...

Read More >