04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The Internal Revenue Service has recently issued final regulations easing requirements for hardship ...
Read More >
The Department of Treasury’s office that administers reviews of foreign investments in U.S. compani...
Read More >
On February 1, 2021, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued for publication in the Federal R...
Read More >
As part of an analysis, Fidelity Investments compared average asset allocations of participants to a...
Read More >
Women make up the majority of employees in the healthcare industry. According to the Bureau of Labor...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: • Is going public even necessary any longer? (FT) •...
Read More >