04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires employers in the healthcare industry to provide a reasona...
Read More >
Or almost everything. Employers, has this ever happened to you? You have a lousy employee, whom we...
Read More >
Moved by Covid’s bite out of the energy industry, oil behemoths ExxonMobil and Chevron Corp. have h...
Read More >
In December, 2019, New Jersey enacted the Create a Respectful and Open Workspace for Natural Hair Ac...
Read More >
A sales employee suffers from acute stress and anxiety, which ultimately force him to take a 12-week...
Read More >
On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued its final rule to update the salary...
Read More >