X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

The Clock Is Ticking On Changes Required Now That The Governor Has Signed SB 75, Which Includes The Workplace Transparency Act

On Friday, August 9, 2019, Governor Pritzker signed SB 75, as part of a massive overhaul of employme...

Read More >

This Project Is Behind Schedule – What Is a Contractor to Do?

Construction projects rarely, if ever, go precisely as planned. One of the most common issues govern...

Read More >

Recent Lawsuits Highlight Pressure Points In M&A Deals Negotiated Pre-COVID-19

The COVID-19 crisis is highlighting pressure points in pending M&A deals that were negotiated before...

Read More >

Ohio returns to funding spec-based commercial & industrial development

In 2020, Ohio’s development officials are again awarding grants to fund commercial and industrial d...

Read More >

Financial Services Weekly Roundup: OCC Adds “Madden Fix” To Its Playbook

In This Issue. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) finalized its “Madden fix,” est...

Read More >

New York State Overhauls Harassment Laws Making it Easier to Bring Employers to Court

Earlier this summer the New York State Senate and Assembly passed a bill aimed to amend the New York...

Read More >