X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Storm Water Enforcement: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality and Ocean Springs Development Enter into Agreed Order

The Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (“MCEQ”) and Little Bluff, LLC, (“Little Bluf...

Read More >

Silence on Employment Contract After Expiration Did Not Imply Renewal

Many written employment agreements contain automatic renewal provisions that apply at the end of the...

Read More >

Delaware Court Of Chancery Finds Allegations Of Personal And Professional Relationships Sufficient To Excuse Pre-Suit Demand

On September 30, 2019, Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard of the Delaware Court of Chancery denied defenda...

Read More >

A New Antitrust “Safety Zone” for Vertical Mergers

The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (collectively, “Agencies”) recentl...

Read More >

DOJ’s Antitrust Division Accused of Opening Investigations Based on Political Influence

On June 24, John Elias, a former Acting Chief of Staff to the United States Assistant Attorney Gener...

Read More >

DOL Breaks Record in Wage and Hour Enforcement – Time to Consider Self-Audits

Those who believed the Trump administration would scale back the Obama-era Department of Labor’s (D...

Read More >