X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Inside the Courts – An Update From Skadden Securities Litigators - September 2019

This quarter’s issue includes summaries and associated court opinions of selected cases principally...

Read More >

Town of Huntington Tightens Reigns on Mixed-Use Buildings Amid Mixed Opinions

On July 21, 2020, the Huntington Town Board adopted significant amendments to the Town’s zoning and...

Read More >

Significant Changes Looming For Illinois Employers

Undoubtedly, 2019 has been a year of change for Illinois employers, as businesses grapple with new m...

Read More >

Employers No Longer Able to Require Arbitration Agreements As Condition of Employment

On October 10, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law a new bill (AB 51) that will have a subst...

Read More >

Court Blocks Ban On Mandatory Arbitration Agreements In Employment

Mandatory arbitration agreements in employment have been granted a stay of execution. For now. Earli...

Read More >