X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Talk before suspending for non payment

On 26 June 2020, the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (Act) came into force with changes...

Read More >

The President’s Recent Immigration Proclamations Will Profoundly Affect Asset Management Firms and Hedge Funds

Asset management firms and hedge funds regularly employ the very best financial and quantitative ana...

Read More >

Say It Ain’t So!—NJ Moves To Tighten Up Already Strangling A-B-C Test For Independent Contractors

The New Jersey test for independent contractor status under the unemployment laws is already very to...

Read More >

Negotiating The Private Side Of Going Private Transactions

In this article, we follow up on our overview of going private transactions (available here) by focu...

Read More >

Federal Communications Commission Penalizes Marriott Vacations for Unauthorized Transfer of Private Radio Licenses

Because many hotels and resorts hold Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses for the wi...

Read More >

Illinois Equal Pay Act Amendment Prohibits Employers from Asking About Compensation History

• A recent amendment to the Illinois Equal Pay Act generally prohibits employers inquiring about a ...

Read More >