X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Memorial Healthcare to Pay $74,418 to Settle EEOC Religious Discrimination Lawsuit

Hospital Unlawfully Refused Reasonable Accommodation for Religious Belief and Rescinded Job Offer, F...

Read More >

Governor Cuomo Announces Plan to Eliminate Tip Credit for Employees Outside the Hospitality Industry

The New York State Department of Labor, after holding multiple hearings across the state regarding t...

Read More >

FTC Decreases Thresholds for HSR Filings, Adjusts Civil Penalties, Looks to Revise HSR Rules

Our Antitrust and M&A Groups analyze this year’s Federal Trade Commission decreases to its threshol...

Read More >

McLeod Health to Pay $133,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Lawsuit

Non-Profit Medical Institution Subjected Employee to Illegal Medical Examinations and Fired Her in V...

Read More >

Fifth Circuit Holds Procedural Unconscionability Determination Was From Judge, Not Arbitrator, Despite Delegation Clause

An employee sued her former employer alleging that she was unlawfully terminated under federal law. ...

Read More >

Financial Daily Dose 10.1.2019 | Top Story: Credit Suisse COO Resigns in Wake of Corporate Spying Scandal

Top Tidjane Thiam ally Pierre-Olivier Bouee, Credit Suisse’s COO, has resigned in the wake of an in...

Read More >