X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

An Additional 450 Weeks on Reopener Cases That Become Total Cases

Previously, on a reopener of a permanent partial total disability case that turned into a permanent ...

Read More >

New York Enacts Various New Employment Laws

• The New York State Equal Pay Act (EPA) now will apply to all protected categories (including race...

Read More >

BPDA Approves Fair Housing Zoning Amendment

The Boston Planning and Development Agency (“BPDA”) has approved an amendment to the Boston Zoning...

Read More >

California Court of Appeal Addresses Remedies When Contractor Records Invalid Mechanic's Lien

The California Court of Appeal recently discussed an owner's remedies (and some limits to those reme...

Read More >

Three Legal Areas to Think About When Using Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace

Last Friday, I had the opportunity to talk about Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace at the CBI...

Read More >

Active Collaboration Throughout the Deal - Preserving and Creating Value for Target Companies in M&A

During the M&A cycle, we observe that the likelihood of value creation for the acquirer and emerging...

Read More >