X
04May

Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose

In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/

Related

Religious Accommodation And Patient Safety In Healthcare Industry

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires employers in the healthcare industry to provide a reasona...

Read More >

In Retaliation Cases, Timing Is Everything.

Or almost everything. Employers, has this ever happened to you? You have a lousy employee, whom we...

Read More >

Financial Daily Dose 2.1.2021 | Top Story: Exxon and Chevron Merger On Table as Covid Devastates Big Oil

Moved by Covid’s bite out of the energy industry, oil behemoths ExxonMobil and Chevron Corp. have h...

Read More >

New Jersey Bans Natural Hair Discrimination

In December, 2019, New Jersey enacted the Create a Respectful and Open Workspace for Natural Hair Ac...

Read More >

To Pay or Not to Pay – That is the Question!

A sales employee suffers from acute stress and anxiety, which ultimately force him to take a 12-week...

Read More >

Employers Have Until January 1, 2020 to Comply With New DOL Overtime Rule

On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued its final rule to update the salary...

Read More >