04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: • FTC orders compliance. Will Facebook comply? (NYT)...
Read More >
Congress recently passed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE Act, ...
Read More >
Most employers with more than 10 employees are required to keep a record of serious work-related inj...
Read More >
Does an employer who genuinely believes that its workers are independent contractors and tells them ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Establishments with 250 or more employees that are currently required to keep OS...
Read More >
As a plan provider, it makes sense to create an ancillary line of business if it’s a natural carryo...
Read More >