04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Employers frustrated with the cumbersome rules and added expenses for furnishing plan documents, sum...
Read More >
Welcome to the 25th issue of the Blakes Pensions Newsletter. This newsletter provides a summary of r...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board continues its efforts to revisit earlier decisions that expanded ...
Read More >
An IT consulting company based in Southern California recently paid $48,193 to one employee after th...
Read More >
With some Canada Labour Code (CLC) amendments in Bill C-44, the Budget Implementation Act, 2017, No....
Read More >
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has published a final rule increasing...
Read More >