04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
The recent antitrust attacks on no-poach clauses encourage insomnia among franchise lawyers. But is ...
Read More >
Financial Services Company Disciplined a Black Employee for Complaining About Discrimination, Agency...
Read More >
On June 3, 2019, the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower announced a $3 million award to two whistleb...
Read More >
The New Jersey “Task Force on Employee Misclassification” has released its report on misclassifica...
Read More >
On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued its final overtime rule as it relat...
Read More >
Employee burnout is now an officially diagnosable condition. According to the World Health Organizat...
Read More >