04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
Now that the calendar has flipped to 2020, planning and fundraising efforts are intensifying in adva...
Read More >
The COVID-19 pandemic and the corresponding economic volatility has dramatically impacted the US and...
Read More >
Ontario: Amendments to Employment Standards Act and Labour Relations Act - New Legislation Enacted ...
Read More >
On February 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced revised notification thresholds fo...
Read More >
An Oklahoma refinery employee who was terminated after testing positive for amphetamines tried to ge...
Read More >
The past decade’s robust mergers and acquisitions volume sparked the rapid growth of representation...
Read More >