04May
Parties’ Agreement Doesn’t Pull the Trigger on California’s Statute of Repose
In Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. Superior Court, 257 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020), the Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, addressed whether a party’s contractual definition of the phrase “substantial completion”...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/parties-agreement-doesn-t-pull-the-89772/
Related
UNITE HERE hopes to increase its membership by one-third, to 400,000 members, by 2024, according to ...
Read More >
Agreeing with a trial court that the arbitration agreements at issue were both procedurally and subs...
Read More >
Certified Rigger Fired Due to Epilepsy, Federal Agency Charged - SEATTLE - Bellingham, Wash.-based...
Read More >
In a complex and competitive market, minimising and mitigating risk in M&A is a key concern for deal...
Read More >
Paul Brodie is the CEO of Brodie Consulting. He is a consultant and keynote speaker, and most intere...
Read More >
On February 6, 2020, Nicaraguan Ministry of Labor issued the Ministerial Agreement number ALTB-01-02...
Read More >