X
02Jul

District Court Judge Rejects M&A Mootness Fee Settlement As A “Racket” That “Must End”

Seyfarth Synopsis: Following Delaware’s lead in Trulia, an Illinois District Court judge refused to approve a mootness fee settlement as “worthless to the shareholders.” The judge noted that such settlements amounted to a plaintiffs’ bar “racket”...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/district-court-judge-rejects-m-a-55556/

Related

New NJ Misclassification Laws Increase Compliance Demands On Employers

A new package of pro-employee laws regarding worker misclassification in New Jersey was recently sig...

Read More >

The Coronavirus’ Impact on Pending Land Use Applications and Approved Construction Projects

Despite the crippling impact that the coronavirus is having on all aspects of our daily lives, many ...

Read More >

The Strategic Role of Systematic Health Care M+A in Remaking the Future of Health Care

This white paper analyzes the interplay of those middle market health care business mergers and acqu...

Read More >

Employment Law Checklist Project: Employers, “Public Health Emergency” and COVID-19

With talk of a pandemic of the COVID-19 illness (coronavirus) become more prevalent and advice from ...

Read More >

NLRB Serves Up An Epic Ruling For Employers

In its first significant decision applying the Supreme Court’s holding in Epic Systems v. NLRB, 584...

Read More >

Driven Fence Agrees to Pay $25,000 to Settle EEOC Race Harassment Lawsuit

Fencing Company's Mistreatment of Black Employee, Including Racial Slurs and Noose Display, Forced H...

Read More >