X
02Jul

District Court Judge Rejects M&A Mootness Fee Settlement As A “Racket” That “Must End”

Seyfarth Synopsis: Following Delaware’s lead in Trulia, an Illinois District Court judge refused to approve a mootness fee settlement as “worthless to the shareholders.” The judge noted that such settlements amounted to a plaintiffs’ bar “racket”...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/district-court-judge-rejects-m-a-55556/

Related

Pennsylvania Expands Mandatory E Verify Use to Entire Construction Industry

Pennsylvania recently passed noteworthy new legislation known as the Construction Industry Employee ...

Read More >

Questions Raised By Coronavirus Construction Delays

Across the country, construction projects are closing down as a result of the Coronavirus (COVID-19)...

Read More >

Third Circuit Upholds Anti-Assignment Provision Barring Provider’s ERISA Suit Against Insurer

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently confirmed that “anti-assignment” provisions...

Read More >

Massachusetts Issues Guidance on When Contractors and Other Workers Count Towards the ‘25 Covered Individuals’ Threshold

As we previously reported, the Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave (“DFML”) has b...

Read More >

How long is too long? Construing non-compete restrictions in shareholders’ agreements

Non-compete restrictions for key stakeholders are common in shareholders' agreements. In Guest Servi...

Read More >

Freelancers’ California Court Loss Doesn’t Bode Well For Gig Economy Businesses

As readers of this blog know, three separate groups have filed lawsuits seeking to block or overturn...

Read More >