02Jul
District Court Judge Rejects M&A Mootness Fee Settlement As A “Racket” That “Must End”
Seyfarth Synopsis: Following Delaware’s lead in Trulia, an Illinois District Court judge refused to approve a mootness fee settlement as “worthless to the shareholders.” The judge noted that such settlements amounted to a plaintiffs’ bar “racket”...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
The temporary restraining order (“TRO”) which prevents the enforcement of AB 51 remains in effect ...
Read More >
On December 19, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) held that employers can require...
Read More >
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released IRS Notice 2019-63, which provides a 30-day automati...
Read More >
On September 29, 2020, Judge Sarah Pitlyk, a 2019 Trump appointee to the Eastern District of Missour...
Read More >
On December 16, 2019, the National Minimum Wage Commission (“CONASAMI” for its acronym in Spanish)...
Read More >
In Town of Brookhaven v Golemi, 2019 NY Slip Op 51477(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County 2019], the Town of ...
Read More >