02Jul
District Court Judge Rejects M&A Mootness Fee Settlement As A “Racket” That “Must End”
Seyfarth Synopsis: Following Delaware’s lead in Trulia, an Illinois District Court judge refused to approve a mootness fee settlement as “worthless to the shareholders.” The judge noted that such settlements amounted to a plaintiffs’ bar “racket”...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
The Ninth Circuit ruled that a California Matco Tool franchisee, John Fleming, could bring a class a...
Read More >
A Trending News interview from Employment Law This Week®, featuring attorney Adam S. Forman of Epste...
Read More >
Participants in M&A transactions may lose eligibility, possibly retroactively, for the “employee re...
Read More >
When, if ever, is swearing at your supervisor or coworkers a federally protected activity? The Natio...
Read More >
On December 7, 2019, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) reissued the ge...
Read More >
In University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), a 3 to 1 majority of the National Labor Relations...
Read More >