03Mar
“Actual Knowledge” Required to Apply ERISA’S Three-Year Statute of Limitations to Fiduciary Breach Claims
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee et al. v. Sulyma (case number 18-1116). The decision requires a participant to have “actual knowledge” in order to apply ERISA’s three year statute of...
By:
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
Related
BakerHostetler invites you to join us for an upcoming webinar, Federal Trade Commission - Antitrust ...
Read More >
On June 24, the Supreme Court held in Dutra Group v. Batterton that punitive damages may not be awar...
Read More >
In RGC Gaslamp v. Ehmcke Sheet Metal Co., the Fourth Appellate District held that a trial court prop...
Read More >
The New Jersey independent contractor test is one of the toughest for a putative employer to prevail...
Read More >
Welcome to this special five-part podcast series with Jay Rosen, VP of Business Development for Affi...
Read More >
A new California law, stemming from Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), expands and codifies the California Supr...
Read More >