X
28Feb

Not justified – ET hands down ruling on university's compulsory retirement age

Dentons | | Return|
In its recent ruling in the case of Ewart v. The University of Oxford, the Employment Tribunal (ET) found that Oxford University (the University) acted unlawfully in dismissing Professor Paul Ewart under its employer justified retirement age policy...
By: Dentons
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/not-justified-et-hands-down-ruling-on-39841/

Related

Australian Merger Control: SLC v Industry Engineering or Economic Theory – Takeaways From Vodafone/TPG & Pacific National

IN BRIEF - Two recent contested merger cases, the Vodafone/TPG merger and Pacific National's (PN) ac...

Read More >

Impact of New Department of Labor HRA Regulations on Retiree Only HRAs

On June 13, 2019, the Department of Labor (the “DOL”), along with the Departments of Treasury and ...

Read More >

President Trump Issues Executive Order Loosening Constraints on Federal Government Contractors’ Workforce Options

Government contractors received a treat for Halloween, as President Trump issued an Executive Order ...

Read More >

Activist Investor to Pay $609,810 to Settle HSR Violations

Activist investor Third Point LLC and three funds that it controls have agreed to settle Federal Tra...

Read More >

Court Says Disability-Based Harassment Is Unlawful Under ADA But Finds Plaintiff’s Evidence Lacking

Although we would like to believe that we live in a more enlightened era, disability rights activist...

Read More >

Colombia: Changes in the regulation of judicial notifications

The Ministry of Justice and Law issued Resolution No. 806 of June 4, 2020, implementing important ch...

Read More >