X
28Feb

Supreme Court Decides Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma

On February 26, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, holding that, for purposes of ERISA’s three-year statute of limitations, a plan beneficiary does not have “actual knowledge” of a breach of...
By: Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-decides-intel-corporation-61515/

Related

New York Bans Discrimination, Retaliation Based on Employee Reproductive Health Decisions

A New York State law, effective as of November 8, prohibits employers from discriminating or retalia...

Read More >

Contract Clause for Weather Delays Does Not Override Suspension of Work Clause

In the recent case of Granite Construction Co., ASBCA 62281, the Armed Services Board of Contract Ap...

Read More >

How Coronavirus Is Effecting the Construction Industry: An Evolving Tracker of Construction Shutdowns Across the United States

Like the lives of all Americans, the U.S. construction market has been upended by the outbreak of co...

Read More >

Australian Company & Securities Update | Issue One

KEY LEGAL AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS - Legislative and Regulatory Reform - Permanent reforms in...

Read More >

ERISA (10th Circuit): ACCIDENTAL DEATH BENEFIT – Death by Speeding Vehicle Excluded Under “Crime” Exclusion

You know that the standard of review applied by courts will significantly impact how courts view an ...

Read More >