X
24Jan

Court Holds That An Employer May Rely On Employee's Promise Not To Compete

Allen Matkins | | Return|
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court held that covenants not to compete were "invalid under section 16600 in California, even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the applicable statutory...
By: Allen Matkins
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/court-holds-that-an-employer-may-rely-33529/

Related

Recovering Construction Costs for A Virus Outbreak—Shifting the Risk for Unforeseen Epidemic Costs Was Not Allowed

Now that COVID-19 impacts and costs are a fact of life, what can we expect in the way of decisions r...

Read More >

As The Workplace Is Evolving, New Federal Labor Laws May Be On The Horizon

As the workplace continues to evolve, lawmakers are poised to develop the labor laws of tomorrow. A ...

Read More >

Who is responsible for providing National Minimum Wage pay information in the context of a TUPE transfer?

Employers are required, under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 (“Act”), to maintain pay records ...

Read More >

Doing Business – Consumer Sector

Entering a new market can be a game changer for businesses in the consumer industry, but it can come...

Read More >

Has the Dust Settled? Interpreting Minnesota’s New Wage Theft Law in the Face of Constantly-Changing DOLI Guidance

It has been nearly three months since Minnesota’s Wage Theft Statute took effect, and the initial c...

Read More >

U.S. District Court Rules in Favor of Airline Flight Crew Employees on Paid Sick Leave Challenge

On October 11, 2019, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washing...

Read More >