24Jan
Court Holds That An Employer May Rely On Employee's Promise Not To Compete
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court held that covenants not to compete were "invalid under section 16600 in California, even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the applicable statutory...
By:
Allen Matkins
Related
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread, U.S. employers considering taking pr...
Read More >
Yesterday September 12, 2019, the California Supreme Court held that private litigants may not recov...
Read More >
In our recent employment law seminar, we discussed how to manage employees who are authorized to pos...
Read More >
On Thursday, January 30, members of Verrill’s Labor & Employment Group and Employee Benefits & Exec...
Read More >
Although California does not have a specific biometric privacy law like Illinois’s 2008 Biometric I...
Read More >
It is not uncommon for private equity funds to reconsider the desirability of a prospect when they l...
Read More >