24Jan
Court Holds That An Employer May Rely On Employee's Promise Not To Compete
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court held that covenants not to compete were "invalid under section 16600 in California, even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the applicable statutory...
By:
Allen Matkins
Related
On January 10, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission and the United States Department of Justice Antitr...
Read More >
The short answer is “yes.” But what if the employee simply lives with someone who recently returne...
Read More >
FTI Consulting (“FTI”) welcomes our clients and friends to our inaugural edition of The Activism V...
Read More >
In a recent appeal to the Divisional Court of Ontario’s Superior Court in Shete, Lada, and Chung v....
Read More >
On January 1, 2020, a new California law could prevent employers in that state from requiring arbitr...
Read More >
This month's Friday Five discusses cases that probe the issue of what is appropriately considered in...
Read More >