X
24Jan

Court Holds That An Employer May Rely On Employee's Promise Not To Compete

Allen Matkins | | Return|
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court held that covenants not to compete were "invalid under section 16600 in California, even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the applicable statutory...
By: Allen Matkins
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/court-holds-that-an-employer-may-rely-33529/

Related

Allegedly “(Leon) Black”-listed Former Apollo Employee Fails to State A Business Tort Claim

The line between aggressive business competition and unlawful conduct can sometimes be difficult to ...

Read More >

Weekly IRS Roundup November 25 – 29, 2019

Presented below is our summary of significant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance and relevant t...

Read More >

[Podcast]: Worker Classification after Dynamex, Not as Simple as ABC

In its 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, the Califor...

Read More >

Tracking the Latest in Employee Exemptions from the California Consumer Privacy Act

The California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) is set to take effect January 1, 2020. Since the anno...

Read More >

Congress Considering Bills to Radically Change Distribution of Employment-Based Green Cards

Earlier this month the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants...

Read More >

Responding To The 2019 Novel Coronavirus: Guidance For Singapore Employers

The Singapore government has introduced additional control measures to minimize the risk of further ...

Read More >