24Jan
Court Holds That An Employer May Rely On Employee's Promise Not To Compete
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court held that covenants not to compete were "invalid under section 16600 in California, even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the applicable statutory...
By:
Allen Matkins
Related
On 1 July 2019 China's antitrust agency, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), made...
Read More >
World Law Group member firms recently collaborated on a Global Venture Capital Guide that covers mor...
Read More >
The offshore wind sector continues to grow at an unprecedented rate, particularly in Europe, and inc...
Read More >
I’m stubborn and there are just some things I don’t understand, so hear me out. I got a call not ...
Read More >
When an employer experiences growth and is projected to employ 50 or more employees, an employer can...
Read More >
The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR) requires parties to transactions meet...
Read More >