24Jan
Court Holds That An Employer May Rely On Employee's Promise Not To Compete
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court held that covenants not to compete were "invalid under section 16600 in California, even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the applicable statutory...
By:
Allen Matkins
Related
On March 22, 2020, the City of Philadelphia issued a Prohibition on Non-Essential Business that mand...
Read More >
Where does creativity fit into compliance? In more places than you think. Problem-solving, accountab...
Read More >
In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode The Doomsday Machine which a...
Read More >
Many small or solo franchisees, subsidiaries, and affiliates of larger businesses may think the Cali...
Read More >
Leaked Legal Advice Protected Under Privilege, Court of Appeal Holds - Precedential Decision by Jud...
Read More >
PwC and CB Insights’ latest MoneyTree Report reports a 3% increase in U.S. venture capital deals th...
Read More >