07Jun
California Court of Appeals Weighs in on the Duty to Defend and Suggests “Fetch” New Motion
It’s not uncommon for construction contracts to include indemnity provisions requiring the indemnitor (typically, the lower-tiered party) to “defend, indemnify and hold harmless” the indemnitee (typically, the higher-tiered party) from third-party...
By:
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
Related
The changes to the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (Act) comme...
Read More >
The Arizona Court of Appeals recently published a decision examining the Registrar of Contractor’s ...
Read More >
On Thursday, February 4, Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Su...
Read More >
With his signature on AB 5 on September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom has completed the...
Read More >
Although the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) places arbitration agreements on the same footing as ...
Read More >
In a much-anticipated decision, a federal appeals court just ruled that Fair Labor Standards Act (FL...
Read More >