09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
When seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant, whether a noncompete or a nonsolicit, the standard p...
Read More >
As previously addressed by the OSHA Law Blog, California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards...
Read More >
In Logan v. MGM Grand Detroit Casino, released September 25, 2019, the United States Court of Appeal...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) announced last week that it was proposing a series of ...
Read More >
In a departure from decisions in recent years, the California high court has finally imposed some li...
Read More >
Family office managers and private equity general partners have many common interests. Chief among t...
Read More >