09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently upheld a provision in a merger agreement that prevented the ...
Read More >
COVID-19 is likely to reshape the competitive landscape for many industries, including triggering in...
Read More >
A study from T. Rowe Price about 401(k) plan participants had some results that should really not sh...
Read More >
As the coronavirus pandemic’s devastating impacts continue to evolve, governments at all levels (lo...
Read More >
As this reader likely knows, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires that covered employers pay...
Read More >
Pangaea One Acquisition Holdings XII S.À.R.L. v. The Queen, 2020 FCA 21 - The Federal Court of App...
Read More >