09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
In Nemchin v. Green, the Court of Appeal for Ontario clarified a number of important aspects of the ...
Read More >
During college in the 1970s, I spent my summers working as a framer in residential construction; I w...
Read More >
CONVERGE19 is in its 4th year of bringing together the world’s leading companies for 2 days of dyna...
Read More >
On January 21, 2020, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed Senate Bill 3170 (the “amendments” or ...
Read More >
There has been a significant change regarding what construction is considered “essential” and may ...
Read More >
The SEC recently adopted comprehensive amendments to its rules that govern financial statement requi...
Read More >