09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, ...
Read More >
The UK will no longer be a Member State of the European Union (the “EU”) as of 11 p.m. on 31 Janua...
Read More >
According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), retaliation claims continue to...
Read More >
Thomaston Acquisition, LLC v. Piedmont Construction Group, Inc., No. S19Q0249, 2019 BL 202176 (Ga. J...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: • Samsung faces child labor charges in France. (FT) ...
Read More >
Alabama’s materialman’s lien statute (specifically, Ala. Code § 35-11-211) was intended to provide...
Read More >