09Jan
Delaware Confirms the High Threshold for Material Adverse Effect Claims and Interprets ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’
A year after Akorn v. Fresenius (Akorn case), the first Delaware case holding that a party was entitled to terminate a merger agreement based on a material adverse effect (MAE), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Channel Medsystems, Inc. v. Boston...
By:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related
During the 2019 legislative session, the Maryland House and Senate voted to enact the Criminal Recor...
Read More >
In June 2019, the Illinois’ Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act (HR1438) (“Cannabis Act”) was signed ...
Read More >
On July 12, Governor Cuomo signed a bill amending the New York Human Rights Law to prohibit employme...
Read More >
On Tuesday, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) announced that, on Februa...
Read More >
Policing hospital mergers has become a top enforcement priority among federal antitrust enforcers. I...
Read More >
For the first time in our country’s history, today’s workforce consists of five generations workin...
Read More >