13Nov
ARB: No Protected Activity where Employee Inadvertently Informed Employer and Only “Hinted” at Filing Whistleblower Complaint
Seyfarth Synopsis: The DOL’s ARB rejected an employee’s SOX retaliation claim where he inadvertently provided information to his employer and only “hinted” that he was filing a SOX-protected complaint. The ARB seems unwilling to accept retaliation...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/arb-no-protected-activity-where-79236/
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Salazar v. McDonald’s Corporation is we...
Read More >
The Situation: Stockholders sought appraisal—judicial determination of the "fair value" of their st...
Read More >
Just last year, the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court (2018) 4 C...
Read More >
Massachusetts continues to expand its response to the novel coronavirus ("COVID-19"), by taking addi...
Read More >
When we use the word “material” as an adjective in ordinary writing, such as in “a material event...
Read More >
The close of the decade ended with a flurry of activity on the labor and employment front, creating ...
Read More >