X
13Nov

ARB: No Protected Activity where Employee Inadvertently Informed Employer and Only “Hinted” at Filing Whistleblower Complaint

Seyfarth Synopsis: The DOL’s ARB rejected an employee’s SOX retaliation claim where he inadvertently provided information to his employer and only “hinted” that he was filing a SOX-protected complaint. The ARB seems unwilling to accept retaliation...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/arb-no-protected-activity-where-79236/

Related

Common Sense Prevails For California Franchisors: Ninth Circuit Focuses On Actual Control of the Worker in Joint Employment Analysis

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Salazar v. McDonald’s Corporation is we...

Read More >

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Unaffected Market Price in Statutory Appraisal Action

The Situation: Stockholders sought appraisal—judicial determination of the "fair value" of their st...

Read More >

California Passes AB 5: The Lawful Use of Independent Contractors in California is Drastically Limited

Just last year, the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court (2018) 4 C...

Read More >

Massachusetts Governor Files Bill and Issues Executive Order to Ease Permitting Process During COVID-19

Massachusetts continues to expand its response to the novel coronavirus ("COVID-19"), by taking addi...

Read More >

Defining “Material”—What Matter Will Matter?

When we use the word “material” as an adjective in ordinary writing, such as in “a material event...

Read More >

A New Decade Begins! Ensure Your Business Is Up to Speed on California’s New Employer Requirements

The close of the decade ended with a flurry of activity on the labor and employment front, creating ...

Read More >