X
19Oct

Supreme Court’s Decision Not To Review California’s Arbitration Framework Means We Have A Roadmap For Compliance

Fisher Phillips | | Return|
The U.S. Supreme Court just did something that was more than just a bit out of character—it rejected the opportunity to find that California had once again overstepped its bounds by creating judicial rules disfavoring arbitration. It did so by...
By: Fisher Phillips
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-s-decision-not-to-review-77000/

Related

When Do M+A Discussions Constitute MNPI? Recent SEC Guidance May Shed Some Light

Last month, the SEC announced that a public company had agreed to pay a $20 million penalty to resol...

Read More >

A (Temporary) Reprieve for Mandatory Workplace Arbitration

On December 30, 2019, a federal judge in the Eastern District of California entered an order tempora...

Read More >

Minneapolis Passes Wage Theft Ordinance

One month after the State of Minnesota’s Wage Theft Statute went into effect, the Minneapolis City ...

Read More >

Sustainable Development and Land Use Update - March 2020 #3

What California developers need to know about permit deadlines and extensions during COVID-19 disrup...

Read More >

New York State Enters 2020 With Key Labor And Employment Law Changes

New York rang in the new year with a pair of significant labor law developments. Governor Andrew Cuo...

Read More >

2019 New Mexico Legislative Update: What All Healthcare Providers Should Know

In 2019, the Legislature enacted several bills affecting healthcare practitioners in New Mexico. Alt...

Read More >