X
19Oct

Supreme Court’s Decision Not To Review California’s Arbitration Framework Means We Have A Roadmap For Compliance

Fisher Phillips | | Return|
The U.S. Supreme Court just did something that was more than just a bit out of character—it rejected the opportunity to find that California had once again overstepped its bounds by creating judicial rules disfavoring arbitration. It did so by...
By: Fisher Phillips
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-s-decision-not-to-review-77000/

Related

Proposed Changes to Stock Option Tax Rules

On June 17, 2019, Canada’s finance minister tabled a Notice of Ways and Means Motion regarding the ...

Read More >

Courts, Not Arbitrators, Decide Gateway Issue of Class Proceedings

Who should decide the gateway issue of whether an arbitration agreement permits class proceedings? C...

Read More >

The SECURE Act: What does it mean for me?

In December 2019, Congress passed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2...

Read More >

[Audio] Robert Bond on GDPR’s Impact on Internal Investigations

GDPR requires businesses to be transparent, fair, and proportionate in how they collect process and ...

Read More >

[Video] The Use of Monitors by State Attorneys General-Part I: The Role of State Attorneys General as Enforcers

In this five-part podcast series, I consider the use of monitors by state Attorneys General. I am jo...

Read More >

New York Courts Continue to Uphold Enforceability of No Damages for Delay Clauses - Construction and Procurement Law News, Q2 2019

A New York trial court recently upheld the enforceability of a no-damages-for-delay clause in a cont...

Read More >