X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Stop Work Orders and Construction Project Site Abandonment Series: Part 2 – Construction Project Site Abandonment

As the Novel-Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) continues to cause disruption to every aspect of society, th...

Read More >

Employers Must Use A New I-9 Form For 2020

The federal government just released an updated Form I-9, and although you aren’t required to use t...

Read More >

The Year in Mergers & Acquisitions - Our Popular Reads in 2019

A recap of some of the most well-read M&A publications on JD Supra during 2019....By: Beacon Insight...

Read More >

Love in the Time of Coronavirus: Protecting Trade Secrets During a Pandemic

Fear of the coronavirus is causing many employers to permit—or in some cases mandate—employees to ...

Read More >

You Can’t Touch My Hair: California Bans Racial Discrimination Based on Hairstyle with CROWN Act

On July 3, California made history by enacting the Creating a Respectful and Open Workplace for Natu...

Read More >

Whistleblower Protection Program: New Legislative Changes – What You Need to Know

In response to long-running campaigns and public pressure, the Australian Government has amended the...

Read More >