X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Sixth Circuit clarifies how to establish a “regarded as” ADA claim and revives former employee’s suit with “smoking gun” email

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed a district court’s summary judgment in favor o...

Read More >

Beyond Brexit transition - Continued uncertainty for construction projects

There is no change in the two key issues that have been causing concern to those involved in real es...

Read More >

2019 Summer review: M&A legal and market developments

We set out in the attached Newsletter a number of interesting English court decisions and market dev...

Read More >

FLSA Applies To Cannabis Industry Workers

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently ruled that the Fair Labor Standards Act (“...

Read More >

US Department of State Releases December 2019 Visa Bulletin

In the December 2019 Visa Bulletin issued by the US Department of State, EB-2 worldwide employment-b...

Read More >

5 Things You Need To Know About The Labor Board’s New Joint Employment Rule

The National Labor Relations Board just published a final rule that will soon fundamentally alter th...

Read More >