X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Is Debt Between A Corporation And Its Sole Shareholder Extinguished By The Merger Doctrine? Access Realty Gives Us An Answer (Sort Of).

Under the merger doctrine, when the same person is both the creditor and the debtor with respect to ...

Read More >

Commercial Tenants Raising Impossibility of Performance and Frustration of Purpose

New York courts have applied the common law doctrines of Impossibility of Performance and Frustratio...

Read More >

What Retailers Can Expect From OSHA This Holiday Season (And How To Stay Prepared)

With the 2019 holiday shopping season kicking off in earnest this upcoming Black Friday, OSHA circul...

Read More >

Using Legal Technology to Navigate Complex Data in Construction Arbitration

Technology is constantly evolving the construction and engineering industries. Recent trends include...

Read More >

Wright Construction Services, Inc. v. Hard Art Studio, PLLC

Poyner Spruill recently prevailed before the North Carolina Court of Appeals.  On December 31st, 202...

Read More >