X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Massachusetts Issues New Guidance on “Essential” “Construction-Related Activities” — Appears More Narrow

On March 31, 2020, Massachusetts Governor Baker replaced its prior list of “Essential Services” wi...

Read More >

ISS, Rights Plans and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The rapid and significant decline in stock trading prices of many public companies due to the effect...

Read More >

Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2020: Executive Summary

Election and Impeachment - The presidential race will garner much of the attention during the 2020...

Read More >

NJ Amends WARN Act To Count Part-Time Workers And Pay Severance In Mass Layoffs

A recently signed amendment to the New Jersey WARN Act – the state’s version of the federal Worker...

Read More >

Planning for and Negotiating Mergers & Acquisitions In Light of COVID-19

Whether your company is at the outset of exploring a potential M&A transaction or in the days leadin...

Read More >

The Word On What 401(k) Plan Sponsors May Need

The greatest thing about the Internet is the distribution of information that people used to have to...

Read More >