X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Pensions: What's new this week

Welcome to your weekly update from the Allen & Overy Pensions team, bringing you up to spee?d on the...

Read More >

5 things you need to know about… proposed Takeover Code changes

One The Takeover Panel has announced today proposals to make substantial changes to the UK Takeover...

Read More >

“Super-Sized” Win Delivered to California Franchisors

Ninth Circuit Clarifies Joint Employer Classification - McDonald’s was not a joint employer of its...

Read More >

Alameda County Health Officer Rebukes Oakland Over Interpretation of Alameda County’s Shelter-in-Place Order Regarding Residential

On April 7, the City of Oakland Planning and Building Department released findings and determination...

Read More >

City of Boston Announces Staged Construction Restart, Outlines Expanded Categories and Key Dates

In a memo from Chief of Operations Patrick Brophy, Mayor Martin J. Walsh announced last night that B...

Read More >

DOL Advises: FMLA Leave Should Not Be Delayed, No Exception for Collective Bargaining Agreements

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (“WHD”) recently issued an opinion letter r...

Read More >