X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

New Cybersecurity and Privacy Law in New York Affects Employers in New York and Beyond

The SHIELD Act will impose substantial new obligations on any employer with an employee residing in ...

Read More >

New Executive Order Increases Mitigation Requirements on ‘Essential’ Businesses & Stops All ‘Non-Essential’ Construction In New Jersey

On April 8, 2020, Governor Murphy signed Executive Order No. 122 (the Order) strengthening mitigatio...

Read More >

Construction Contractors Ramping Up Diversity Efforts

In the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd and the resulting Black Lives Matters protests, many...

Read More >

Projects and Construction Review: Qatar

Despite the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Qatar has been able to maintain its extended per...

Read More >

National Retailer Pulls CBD Products From Shelves in Response to FDA Warning to Product Manufacturer

On Monday, July 22, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) took a rare and significant step in ...

Read More >

EEOC Sues Quality Midwestern Holdings / Quality Services Moving for Pregnancy Discrimination

Moving Company Unfairly Denied Employment Opportunities to Pregnant Woman, Federal Agency Charges - ...

Read More >