X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Illinois’ New Retainage Law

Effective August 20, 2019, Illinois law provides that a maximum of 10 percent retainage may be withh...

Read More >

American Woodmark to Pay $25,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit

Employee With Disabilities Denied a Reasonable Accommodation and Discharged After Seeking Two Days o...

Read More >

EEOC Subpoena Of Pattern-Or-Practice Information Based On Individual Charges Upheld

Contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court’s restriction of class actions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes...

Read More >

Maine Legislature Takes Aim at Nondisclosure Agreements

After passing more than 500 bills in 2019, including those mandating paid leave and placing limits o...

Read More >

Is Your Force Majeure Or Unavoidable Delay Notice Ready?

As the novel coronavirus, known as COVID-19, and the associated illness spreads around the world and...

Read More >

Operating in the Ordinary Course in Extraordinary Circumstances

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt markets and shake the global economy, the full impact ...

Read More >