X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Building bridges – Hong Kong construction professionals gain easier access to mainland market

Structural engineers, building surveyors, planners, architects, and other construction professionals...

Read More >

Significant Changes to Australia's Foreign Investment Framework Commenced on 1 January 2021

The Situation: The Australian government has introduced significant changes to its foreign investmen...

Read More >

FTC revises Hart Scott Rodino thresholds for 2021

On February 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced revised jurisdictional thresholds ...

Read More >

Financial Daily Dose 1.22.2021 | Top Story: Google Threatens to Pull Search From Down Under Over Proposed Law

Google has threatened to pull its search engine from the entirety of the Australian continent “if t...

Read More >

Better Healthcare Newsletter from Patrick Malone - August 2019

At what price beauty? How about $16.5 billion — that’s what Americans forked over in 2018 for 17.7...

Read More >

Michigan Supreme Court: CGL Insurance Policy May Provide Contractor With Coverage for Subcontractor’s Faulty Work

On June 29, 2020, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that a subcontractor’s commercial general liabil...

Read More >