X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Toledo bans salary history questions from employers

Toledo, Ohio recently joined the growing number of nationwide jurisdictions to pass local ordinances...

Read More >

IRS Publishes 401(K) Contribution Limit Increases for 2020

It’s that time of year again. On November 6, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced cos...

Read More >

Legislative Highlights for Oregon Employers in 2020

Oregon’s active 2019 legislative session has prompted the need for several policy and handbook upda...

Read More >

COVID-19: Distressed M&A in the Era of a Pandemic -- Part 3

INTRODUCTION - Part 1 of this distressed M&A series addressed the unique aspects of acquiring distre...

Read More >

Timing Considerations for HSR Filings During COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 continues to present novel challenges and disruptions to the merger and acquisitions market...

Read More >

Raising the BAR: CSA Propose Rules to Increase Business Acquisition Report Triggers and Thresholds

On September 5, 2019, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published for comment proposed am...

Read More >