X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

The Accidental Construction Owner: a Checklist of Considerations for HOAs Engaging in Construction

Homeowners associations ("HOAs") do not typically act as construction owners. HOAs are set up as en...

Read More >

Exceptions to the Enforceability of Limitation of Liability Clauses

A common feature of some contracts, including construction and design contracts, is a limitation of ...

Read More >

Court Hits Pause Button on California Arbitration Ban

On October 10, 2019, Governor Newsom signed a law prohibiting employers from requiring employees to ...

Read More >

The DOL Tries to Say Goodbye—And Seriously, We Mean It—to the 80/20 Rule for Tipped Employees

We have all admired (or perhaps been one ourselves) the multitasking, be everywhere and do everythin...

Read More >

Is BIPA Preempted? – Illinois Appellate Court Considers Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity Question

As class actions brought under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) proceed throu...

Read More >

Courts, Not Arbitrators, Decide Gateway Issue of Class Proceedings

Who should decide the gateway issue of whether an arbitration agreement permits class proceedings? C...

Read More >