X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Massey Services Will Pay $63,000 to Settle EEOC Discrimination and Retaliation Lawsuit

Pest Control and Landscaping Company Terminated and Refused to Rehire Employee With Disability After...

Read More >

[Video] #WorkforceWednesday: Joint Employment, Coronavirus, Medical Marijuana Protections - Employment Law This Week®

Welcome to our inaugural edition of #WorkforceWednesday, featuring Employment Law This Week®, blog p...

Read More >

Scope of arbitration agreements: BC Supreme Court decision highlights the importance of defining the scope of an arbitration agreement

The recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Octaform Systems Inc v. Clayworth co...

Read More >

DOJ Issues Merger Remedies Manual – Structural Remedies “Strongly Preferred”

On September 3, 2020, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (DOJ) released a Merger Remedies ...

Read More >

Federal Trade Commission Releases Commentary on Vertical Merger Enforcement

Split along partisan lines, the Federal Trade Commission (Commission) voted last week to issue Comme...

Read More >

[Video] Compliance and Coronavirus- Dr. Gleb Tsipursky on Disaster Avoidance During Covid-19

Welcome to the newest addition to the Compliance Podcast Network, Compliance and Coronavirus. In thi...

Read More >