X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Congressional Committee Targets Private Equity Firms on Medical Billing Practices

Pointing to an increasing trend of private equity firms acquiring physician staffing companies and p...

Read More >

Update on U.S. Merger Review Procedures During COVID-19

The Federal Trade Commission's Premerger Notification Office (PNO) announced that, effective Monday,...

Read More >

The Brave New World of Fiduciary Responsibility for Benefit Plans

Most blog entries focus on new developments or recent legislation. This one’s a bit different. Its ...

Read More >

[Video] 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program - What is the COSO 2013 Internal Controls Framework?

COSO was adopted in 1992 as a framework for basis to design and then test the effectiveness of inter...

Read More >

2020 Employee Benefit Plan Limits

The IRS has released the 2020 cost-of-living adjustments for limits on employee benefits with some a...

Read More >

Paid Family Medical Leave Amendments and Draft Rules Highlight Supplemental Benefit Options for Employers

In April 2019, Governor Jay Inslee signed SHB 1399, which amended the Washington Paid Family Medical...

Read More >