16Sep
The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/
Related
Australia has introduced significant temporary changes to the notification requirements under the Fo...
Read More >
Employers often struggle to determine whether they might be considered “joint employers” with othe...
Read More >
ALBUQUERQUE - The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and LifeWell Living Center, LL...
Read More >
Joint employment took center stage yesterday during the release of the Fall Regulatory Agenda, as th...
Read More >
The end of the year brought many changes to the labor law. What’s new for employers? We present par...
Read More >
In Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion, clarified...
Read More >