X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

California Local Ordinances Update: Mid-Year Minimum Wage Increases

Many California local ordinances have mid-year minimum wage rate increases effective July 1, 2019. O...

Read More >

Poison Pill Deep Dive Series: Qualifying Offer

The sixth of a six-part series examining six specific and evolving rights plan provisions. As discu...

Read More >

Consider the PEP, a New SECURE Act 401(k) Option

What is a PEP? A PEP or Pooled Employer Plan is a new way, created by the SECURE Act, for unrelated ...

Read More >

How Many Car Accidents Will You Have?

Over the course of a long driving history, usually 50 to 60 years, an average driver is likely to be...

Read More >

New Jersey WARN Act Radically Expanded

Reducing your New Jersey workforce just became more expensive. On January 21, 2020, Governor Phil M...

Read More >

Michigan Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Overview

Drivers need to know about PIP insurance for their cars. Not only is it legally required in many sta...

Read More >