X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

[Video] Accountability: the Heart of Compliance, Episode 4-Delta Airlines Demonstrates Accountability

We have been getting accountability all wrong in the compliance profession. It's not a set of tasks ...

Read More >

Love in the Time of Coronavirus: Protecting Trade Secrets During a Pandemic

Fear of the coronavirus is causing many employers to permit—or in some cases mandate—employees to ...

Read More >

FAQs for Employers Following the Passage of California’s New Law on Independent Contractor Misclassification

On September 18, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 5, which clarifies when w...

Read More >

Acquisition and Leveraged Finance Review – Spain

The covid-19 pandemic has dramatically altered all aspects of life. The acquisition and leverage fin...

Read More >

UK Immigration: Government Publishes Details of New Points Based System

Seyfarth Synopsis: The UK government has published a policy statement outlining the new Points Based...

Read More >

DOL Proposed NEW Electronic Disclosures Rule

Employers frustrated with the cumbersome rules and added expenses for furnishing plan documents, sum...

Read More >