16Sep
The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Related
Deals are generally not blocked in Finland, and are reviewed mostly when in the defense and dual-use...
Read More >
When an organization is considering a major strategic development, such as seeking new investors or ...
Read More >
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently found that a contractor infringed an architect’s des...
Read More >
Starting January 1, 2020, the new Dutch Balanced Labor Market Act (Wet arbeidsmarkt in balans, WAB) ...
Read More >
When the COVID-19 lockdown regulations unexpectedly disrupted ‘receipts’, whilst leaving ‘disburs...
Read More >
Here are ten common questions I receive from clients about issuing equity (stock or options) to serv...
Read More >