X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

WHD Proposes Rule on Fluctuating Workweek

Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage & Hour Division issued a proposed rule on th...

Read More >

Expanded Driver Hours of Service a Response to ELDs, Shows that FMCSA is Listening to Industry

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has announced a notice of proposed rulemakin...

Read More >

Congress Considers Restricting Credit Checks During Hiring

New federal restrictions on hiring practices could be around the corner. Last month, the U.S. House ...

Read More >

Jury Awards $5.2 Million Against Walmart in EEOC Disability Discrimination Case

Jury Finds Retail Giant Suspended and Failed to Accommodate Longtime Deaf Employee With Visual Impai...

Read More >

Public Hospital M&A: Know Your Stakeholders

Hospital transactional activity has soared over the last decade, and many public hospitals are evalu...

Read More >

As a New Deadline Nears, a Primer for Washington Employers on Complying with the Paid Family & Medical Leave Program

As we previously reported, Washington State has begun implementing its new Paid Family & Medical Lea...

Read More >