X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Covid-19 coronavirus: temporary changes to Australia's foreign investment laws

Australia has introduced significant temporary changes to the notification requirements under the Fo...

Read More >

U.S. DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Test

Employers often struggle to determine whether they might be considered “joint employers” with othe...

Read More >

EEOC and Lifewell Living Center, LLC Conciliate Disability Charge

ALBUQUERQUE - The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and LifeWell Living Center, LL...

Read More >

Expect A Trio Of Federal Joint Employment Rules In December

Joint employment took center stage yesterday during the release of the Fall Regulatory Agenda, as th...

Read More >

Significant changes to labor law

The end of the year brought many changes to the labor law. What’s new for employers? We present par...

Read More >

Supreme Court Remands Case Back Seeking Clarification of the Dudenhoeffer Pleading Standard

In Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion, clarified...

Read More >