X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Construction during a Pandemic – New Updates to Pillsbury’s COVID-19 Construction Chart

As more states are re-opening, more states are also issuing guidelines for construction projects. ...

Read More >

Preparing for the New FLSA “Overtime Rule”

For the last several months, we have all been eagerly awaiting USDOL’s final “Overtime Rule” – t...

Read More >

The Failing Firm Antitrust Defense – An Update on Navigating Financially Troubled Mergers During a Pandemic

On June 23, we hosted a webinar on the failing firm defense, focusing on defining the defense and of...

Read More >

Impact of COVID-19 on Real Estate, Construction and Supply Contracts

As coronavirus (COVID-19) continues to disrupt lives and businesses, it is important to consider how...

Read More >

[Video] Innovation in Compliance - Empowering Adversary Intelligence with Luke Wilson

Tom Fox welcomes Luke Wilson to the Innovation In Compliance show. Luke is the Vice President of Int...

Read More >

First Circuit Finds That Funds Were Not Liable for Portfolio Company’s Pension Fund Withdrawal Liability

On November 22, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that two separat...

Read More >