X
10Sep

Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds

Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By: Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/

Related

Towards a reform of our pension system with the Pension Agreement!

After earlier failed negotiations in the autumn of  2018 and a national public transport strike, the...

Read More >

California Codifies Employee Classification Standards

On September 10, 2019, the California State Senate passed Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) effectively requiri...

Read More >

California Supreme Court Clarifies Ministerial vs. Discretionary Actions Under CEQA for Well Construction Permits

Decision in Protecting Our Water and Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus Case - In a l...

Read More >

My Preemptive Strike For Eugene Scalia

That article he wrote on sexual harassment was fine. Yesterday, Politico had a post about a law rev...

Read More >

U.S. Releases Draft Guidelines That Could Significantly Impact Vertical Merger Review

On January 10, 2020, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice’s Antitrust ...

Read More >