X
10Sep

Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds

Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By: Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/

Related

Cutter Mazda of Honolulu Settles EEOC Disability Discrimination Case

Company Commits to Ongoing Efforts to Hire and Recruit Deaf and Hard of Hearing Applicants - HONOL...

Read More >

California Court Rules That Food And Beverage Service Charges May Qualify As Gratuities

A California appellate court just held that mandatory service charges added by banquet facilities to...

Read More >

Employment News: holiday pay, EWCs, EHRC

Noteworthy – no holiday pro-rating for "part year" music teacher - In The Harpur Trust v Brazel th...

Read More >

What is a Reasonable Accommodation Under the ADA?

What is a Reasonable Accommodation Under the ADA? Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, as amen...

Read More >

Raising Cross-Border Debt - The Indian and US Experience: 3-Part Series: COVID-19’s Impact on US & Indian M&A Markets

India - Over the last decade, alternatives to traditional bank lending have emerged to service the ...

Read More >

Weekly Update Newsletter - October 2019 #4

LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW - DoL Collected a Record Amount in Discrimination Settlements in Fiscal Yea...

Read More >