X
10Sep

Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds

Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By: Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/

Related

PropTech Update - January 2021

Fifth Wall to launch PropTech SPAC - The Real Deal – January 6 - Fifth Wall, a prolific PropTec...

Read More >

M&A Litigation 2019 - Australia

A joint Hogan Lovells & GTDT publication on M&A Litigation in Australia. Across common law and code...

Read More >

Compensation and Benefits Insights – September 2019

“Exit Contribution” an End-Run Around de minimis Withdrawal Liability - A recent ruling from the ...

Read More >

Sun Capital Prevails in Long-Running ERISA Liability Dispute, But Pension Risks Remain for Private Equity Funds

Eleven years after its portfolio company’s bankruptcy triggered a multiemployer pension plan’s dem...

Read More >

Transaction Cost Deduction Denied - Tax Court Found Finder's Fee Paid By Target Was Not Paid For Benefit Of Target - Tax Update: Volume 2020, Issue 1

Plano Molding Co. (target), a manufacturer of plastics, was acquired by Plano Holding, an affiliate ...

Read More >

Too Beautiful For a Promotion

The recent nominations of Ursula van de Leyen and Christine Lagarde to two of the most powerful posi...

Read More >