X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

US DOL Changes To Exempt Salary Status On The Horizon – Are You ready?

The United States Department of Labor (DOL) is expected to implement its proposal to amend the minim...

Read More >

CFIUS Issues Proposed Regulations to Expand Jurisdiction to Real Estate Transactions

On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Treasury Department, as chair of the Committee on Foreign Investment...

Read More >

Federal Court in Massachusetts Halts DoorDash Driver’s Claims, Greenlights Arbitration

Background - Last week, the United States Federal Court for the District of Massachusetts granted D...

Read More >

The Anti-SLAPP Evolution Continues: California Supreme Court Confirms Anti-SLAPP Protection Can Apply to Retaliation and Discrimination Claims

Does Anti-SLAPP protection apply to retaliation and discrimination cases? The answer is yes....By: A...

Read More >

Superior Court CCLD Addresses Pleading Standards for Trade Secret, Fraud and Implied Covenant Claims

Brightstar Corp. v. PCS Wireless, LLC, C.A. No. N18C-10-250 PRW CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 7, 2019)....

Read More >