X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

FMLA Retaliation Case Illustrates the Practical Significance of Effective HR Documentation

In Simpson v. Temple University, et al., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsyl...

Read More >

[Video] #BigIdeas2020: NLRB’s Actions Impact Employers in 2020 - Employment Law This Week® - Trending News

A Trending News interview from Employment Law This Week®, featuring attorney Steve Swirsky, Member o...

Read More >

New California Law Will Outlaw “No-Rehire” Provisions In Settlement Agreements

I have discussed in the past how the use of “no-rehire” provisions in settlement agreements betwee...

Read More >

Coronavirus Update: What Should Employers Do?

With confirmed cases in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island, it appears the 2019 Novel Co...

Read More >

Ford Motor Company’s Kentucky Truck Plant to Pay $537,760 to Resolve EEOC Discrimination Finding

Company Improperly Screened and Refused to Hire Applicants Based on Disability, Federal Agency Charg...

Read More >

COVID-19: Distressed M&A in the UK and W&I Insurance Solutions to Warranty Coverage Issues

INTRODUCTION - COVID-19 and the ensuing economic turmoil are continuing to adversely impact business...

Read More >