X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

The National Labor Relations Board Issues Employer-friendly Arbitration Ruling

In its groundbreaking decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 US ___, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018), t...

Read More >

The Protecting the Right to Organize PRO Act of 2019: An Outline of its Proposed Labor Reforms

On February 6, 2020, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 2474, The Protecting the Right to Orga...

Read More >

OFCCP Won’t Use EEO-1 Component 2 Pay Data

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) recently published a notice in the Federa...

Read More >

City of Minneapolis Releases FAQs and Rules for Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance

As we previously reported, the Minneapolis Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance will go into effect on Ja...

Read More >

Grubhub Decision Put On Ice As Retroactivity Question Looms

You’ve been waiting quite a long time for a critical ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals o...

Read More >

Antitrust and the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement

The European Union (EU)-U.K. Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) governing post-Brexit trade relat...

Read More >