X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

A Shock to the System Opens New Doors

A number of trends in the financial services industry related to consumer behavior have snowballed s...

Read More >

Your Job Site is Shut Down, Now What? Read Your Contract – Know Your Rights and Duties

On Monday, March 16, 2020, Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh announced that all active construction sites...

Read More >

The California Supreme Court To Decide Dynamex Retroactivity

The California Supreme Court announced that it would decide whether its April 30, 2018 landmark Dyna...

Read More >

The SECURE Act: Top 3 Issues to Consider Now

Hundreds of articles have been published over the last two weeks about the SECURE Act (“Act”), whi...

Read More >

Physician Non-Compete Agreements Present Challenges, Potential Controversy

When it comes to physician employment agreements, non-compete provisions can be controversial and tr...

Read More >