X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

That Estee Lauder 401(k) case is troubling

I worked at a third-party administration (TPA) where one of our administrators tried to steal money ...

Read More >

New DOJ Merger Remedies Manual: Preference for Structural Remedies and Private Equity Buyers

On September 3, 2020, the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division (the DOJ) issued its new Merger...

Read More >

Does Your Construction Contract Involve Interstate Commerce? If So, Expect Your Arbitration Agreement to Be Enforced

Whether an arbitration agreement is enforceable is a frequently litigated matter in construction dis...

Read More >

November and December 2019 Independent Contractor Misclassification and Compliance Law News Update

Our combined news update provides guidance for companies that utilize independent contractors on wha...

Read More >

Additional Round of Social Security Number “No-Match Letters” Issued

Earlier this year, the Social Security Administration (SSA) announced that it would be resuming the ...

Read More >

Philadelphia Zoning, Land Use, and Construction COVID-19 Update

The Ballard Spahr Zoning and Land Use Team is continuing to monitor all aspects of the Philadelphia ...

Read More >