X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

[Video] Trekking Through Compliance-Episode 14- Balance of Terror

In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode Balance of Terror  which air...

Read More >

Appellate Court Affirms Decision to Block Medical Merger

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s issuance of a...

Read More >

Authorized Access of Proprietary Information and Impact on CFAA Claim

Employers continuously face a key employee or consultant leaving or separating from the company to j...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - India - Q3 2019

On August 8, 2019, India’s new Code on Wages (Code) received the Presidential assent and was notifi...

Read More >

Verify, Re-Verify, But Don’t Over-Verify: I-9 Compliance During an Era of Increased Enforcement

HSI Increases I-9 Audits to Target Unauthorized Employment - In October 2017, U.S. Immigration and...

Read More >

[Webinar] CIO-SP4: A Virtual Town Hall Webinar - April 23rd, 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm ET

CIO-SP4 may be one of the most significant opportunities for both small and large government contrac...

Read More >