X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

Supreme Court: Employers Must Timely Raise Affirmative Defenses Involving Administrative Exhaustion Under Title VII

On June 3, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the charge filing requirement under Title VII of ...

Read More >

Recent Tennessee Construction Cases Regarding Effects of Unlicensed Contracting and "Time is of the Essence" Clauses in Contracts

While neither of the recent cases discussed below establishes new law, they serve as good reminders ...

Read More >

Balancing New Technology and Privacy When Using Drones in Land Use and Construction

The mixture of sheltering-in-place, warm weather, and increasing drone usage creates a combustible s...

Read More >

“We’ve Received A PAGA Notice – Now What?” An Employer’s 10-Step Guide

If you’ve received a PAGA notice, you can count yourself as one of several thousands of California ...

Read More >

[Video] Trekking Through Compliance-Episode 26-The Alternative Factor

In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode The Alternative Factor which...

Read More >

Lucky Seven: Rhode Island the Seventh State to Pass a Statute Governing Non-Compete Agreements During 2019

Rhode Island is the latest state to jump on the bandwagon of limiting the application of non-compete...

Read More >