X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

Contractor Loses Effort to Bind Remote Home Purchaser to Arbitration Clause

On December 8, 2020, in Taylor Morrison of Texas, Inc. v. Kohlmeyer, a Texas Court of Appeals reject...

Read More >

What Labor Secretary Acosta’s Departure Means For Employers

When the news broke Friday afternoon that Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta would be resigning from h...

Read More >

Scalia To Take Labor Department Reins: What Does It Mean For Employers?

The news that President Trump selected Eugene Scalia to take over as Labor Secretary late last week ...

Read More >

Japan Legal Update - Volume 48 | July–August 2019

Corporate - Japanese Government Issues M&A Guidelines - On June 28, 2019, Japan's Ministry of Ec...

Read More >

EEOC Changes Policy on Mandatory Arbitration

This past week, the EEOC withdrew its 1997 policy statement regarding mandatory binding arbitration ...

Read More >

Effective Remedial Action Does Not Require Crystal Ball, Rules Iowa Court

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Sellars v. CRST Expedited, Inc. Case No. C15-117-LTS (July 15, 2019), the Nort...

Read More >