X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

Survival by the Thinnest Margins: Potential Trade Secret Claims Post-Texas TCPA Amendments

Effective on September 1, 2019, the 86th Texas Legislature’s amendments to the Texas Citizen’s Par...

Read More >

If Pain, Yes Gain—Part 72: New Lawsuit Places Dallas Paid Sick Leave Ordinance on the Chopping Block

Seyfarth Synopsis: Just last week, San Antonio agreed to delay implementation of its paid sick leave...

Read More >

A decade of legislation on renewable energy in Kazakhstan: a brief review

July 4, 2019, is the 10th anniversary of the adoption of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On ...

Read More >

Ohio Eighth District Court Of Appeals Reverses Enforcement Of Employment Arbitration Agreement

The Ohio Eighth District Court of Appeals reversed enforcement of an employment arbitration agreemen...

Read More >

Ohio Supreme Court Rules that Statute of Repose Applies to Contract Claims

On July 17, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio announced a major victory for the Ohio construction indu...

Read More >

New HSR and interlocking directorate thresholds announced for 2021

On 2 February 2021 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published the annual jurisdictional adjustment...

Read More >