10Sep
California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By:
Payne & Fears
Related
Beginning September 1, 2019, employers that sponsor cash balance plans and certain merged plans can ...
Read More >
ILPA report highlights new issues that have emerged in the 2010s, including additional concerns abou...
Read More >
In Simpson v. Temple University, et al., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsyl...
Read More >
Most employers are well aware that employees must be paid on a “salary basis” to be considered exe...
Read More >
On February 10, 2020, the Attorney General issued revisions to the proposed regulations to the Calif...
Read More >
I. INTRODUCTION - Until fairly recently, non-compete clauses and other employer practices affecting...
Read More >