X
10Sep

California Supreme Court Casts Doubt on Arbitration Agreements that Require Civil Litigation Procedures for Wage Claims

Payne & Fears | | Return|
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court held in OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, S244630, that a mandatory arbitration agreement may be unenforceable against employee wage claims if it requires the employee to forego the “Berman” hearing process and...
By: Payne & Fears
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-supreme-court-casts-doubt-on-63134/

Related

A New Antitrust “Safety Zone” for Vertical Mergers

The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (collectively, “Agencies”) recentl...

Read More >

Leveraged finance in Asia-Pacific rallies on real estate

Chinese real estate lenders lift APAC high yield bond issuance after an active Q3 - Leveraged fina...

Read More >

EEO-1 Pay Data Alert: EEOC Adds Materials And FAQ Answers To Website

As we approach the July 15 date on which EEOC expects to open the portal to file EEO-1 Component 2 p...

Read More >

NJ Court of Appeals OKs Reimbursement of Employee Medical Marijuana Costs

In a case of first impression, a New Jersey Appellate Division panel ruled on Monday, January 13, 20...

Read More >

Court Takes Narrow Read of Policy Exclusion for ‘Wage and Hour’ Claims

In a potentially beneficial decision for employers, a California appellate panel ruled that the term...

Read More >

OFCCP Week In Review: December 2019

The DE OFCCP Week in Review (WIR) is a simple, fast and direct summary of relevant happenings in the...

Read More >