X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

Biotech & Life Sciences Trends to Consider Following JPM 2020: M&A, Venture Capital and More

The annual gathering of life sciences executives and investors in San Francisco that many now call “...

Read More >

A Movement Against Sexual Abuse, #MeToo Reminds Businesses That Harassment Is Illegal

Compliance officers and general counsel at corporations and businesses are told to surveil the lands...

Read More >

Practical completion: Court of Appeal provides general guidance

A clause stating that a reduction in room size by more than 3% would be “deemed material” related ...

Read More >

[Video] The Use of Monitors by State Attorneys General Part II:  Reaction to the Big Tobacco Settlement and Criticisms of State Attorneys General

In this five-part podcast series, I consider the use of monitors by state Attorneys General. I am jo...

Read More >

AB 203: How Global Climate Change and Valley Fever Impact Workers’ Compensation

According to a recent University of California Irvine study, scientists predict that with increasing...

Read More >

If a company has California employees is it subject to the CCPA?

Not necessarily. Although the CCPA’s definition of “consumer” includes employees that reside in ...

Read More >