X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

Can You Challenge a CPAR Evaluation in a Bid Protest?

Technically, no. However, when the contractor is protesting the award of a contract for the same age...

Read More >

How Multiemployer Pension Plans Continue To Extract More From Contributing Employers Than What They Bargained For

Contributing employers to multiemployer pension plans (“MEPPs”) are commonly surprised that their ...

Read More >

Unpacking the Dynamics of the Private Debt Market

• Following the financial crisis, nonbank lenders looking to carve out new, profitable niches—espe...

Read More >

Personal Surveillance Cameras in the Workplace: Don't Do It

My Director of Nursing (DON) decided to put up a personal surveillance camera in her office. It stre...

Read More >

New York Expands Sexual Harassment Protections

The #MeToo movement’s efforts to protect employees from unlawful harassment continues to resonate a...

Read More >

What to Expect When Employees Are Expecting: New Pregnancy and Lactation Accommodation Requirements for Oregon Employers

During the summer of 2019, the Oregon legislature passed two bills broadening protections for pregna...

Read More >