09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/
Related
A property owner generally has the right to control access to its property, including the rights to ...
Read More >
As part of the 2020 appropriations act, Congress passed the SECURE Act (Setting Every Community Up f...
Read More >
The covid-19 pandemic has dramatically altered all aspects of life. The acquisition and leverage fin...
Read More >
Welcome to Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP’s survey of private investments in public equity transactions...
Read More >
Citing judicial criticism, as well as the original Supreme Court decisions on the issue, the NLRB sw...
Read More >
New York State has updated its guidance on the new rules under the New York State Human Rights Law (...
Read More >