09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Related
The start of a new year always brings a fresh batch of employment concerns. While some workplace iss...
Read More >
The government just sent a stern reminder to all employers, especially those involved in providing h...
Read More >
Dear Sir/Madam, We would like to alert you to the new rules for entering the Russian Federation thr...
Read More >
The increasing and dynamic impact of the novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) is tangible. For example, on J...
Read More >
Reversing the trial court, the Delaware Supreme Court has held that an appraisal proceeding does not...
Read More >
The Seventh Circuit joins the Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits in holding that such a refusal would ...
Read More >