09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/
Related
Technically, no. However, when the contractor is protesting the award of a contract for the same age...
Read More >
Contributing employers to multiemployer pension plans (“MEPPs”) are commonly surprised that their ...
Read More >
• Following the financial crisis, nonbank lenders looking to carve out new, profitable niches—espe...
Read More >
My Director of Nursing (DON) decided to put up a personal surveillance camera in her office. It stre...
Read More >
The #MeToo movement’s efforts to protect employees from unlawful harassment continues to resonate a...
Read More >
During the summer of 2019, the Oregon legislature passed two bills broadening protections for pregna...
Read More >