09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: After a federal magistrate judge in California ordered the EEOC to provide writte...
Read More >
WHAT: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) issued a final rule consolidating the 8(a) and Al...
Read More >
In 2015, the U.S. Department of Labor introduced a proposed rule which would, in part, double the sa...
Read More >
McMillin Homes Constr., Inc. v. National Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 35 Cal.App.5th 1042 (2019); Fourth ...
Read More >
On October 12, 2019, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1291 (“AB 1291”) into law, which require...
Read More >
On June 7, 2019, in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, a reconstituted panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals...
Read More >