X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

NLRB Rules that Employers Can Prohibit Access of Off-Duty Employees of Contractors for Section 7 Rights

A property owner generally has the right to control access to its property, including the rights to ...

Read More >

Implications for 401(k) Plans in the SECURE Act

As part of the 2020 appropriations act, Congress passed the SECURE Act (Setting Every Community Up f...

Read More >

Acquisition and Leveraged Finance Review - UK

The covid-19 pandemic has dramatically altered all aspects of life. The acquisition and leverage fin...

Read More >

A Look at 2019 Sponsor-Backed PIPEs - June 2020

Welcome to Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP’s survey of private investments in public equity transactions...

Read More >

Employers No Longer Have To Allow Union Representatives Use of Public Areas, NLRB Majority Rules

Citing judicial criticism, as well as the original Supreme Court decisions on the issue, the NLRB sw...

Read More >

New York Releases Updated Guidance on Expansion of State Human Rights Law

New York State has updated its guidance on the new rules under the New York State Human Rights Law (...

Read More >