X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

Construction during a Pandemic – New Updates to Pillsbury’s COVID-19 Construction Chart

As more states are re-opening, more states are also issuing guidelines for construction projects. ...

Read More >

E-2 to EB-5: The Journey from Visa to Green Card

This Is The 2nd Of A Trilogy Of Blogs Addressing The E-2 Visa Option Post The November 21 Change In ...

Read More >

Buyer’s Purchase or Seller’s Privilege? Attorney-Client Communications in the Post-Sale Context

Litigators are familiar with the attorney-client privilege as the focus of many discovery disputes, ...

Read More >

USCIS Overhauls H-1B Cap Process For 2020

Last week, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that it had completed pilot testi...

Read More >

Superior Court Judge Sends Stern Message to Construction Industry: Respond to Pay Applications Promptly or Expect to Pay Full Price

In a business where time is money, large construction projects – at least those that are properly m...

Read More >

The Blunt Truth About Testing Employees For Marijuana in California

Despite the legalization of recreational and medicinal marijuana in California, employers maintain t...

Read More >