X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

The Value of Statistical Analytics for Capital Project Management

Consider the following questions for your organization: - What is the value of a 3% improvement in ...

Read More >

Coronavirus FAQ: Key corporate and commercial considerations

The global outbreak of the novel coronavirus COVID-19 is having profound implications for businesses...

Read More >

Chancery Explains When Deal Price is a Persuasive Indicator of Fair Price in an Appraisal Proceeding

In re Appraisal of Stillwater Mining Co., Consol. C.A. No. 2017-0385-JTL (Del. Ch. Aug. 21, 2019). ...

Read More >

2019 Life Sciences Securities Litigation Roundup

2019 Filings - In 2019, the number of securities class action cases filed against life sciences com...

Read More >

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Set to Re-Issue Lapsed Stormwater Permit for Construction Activities

As readers of prior client alerts may be aware, DEEP’s General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwat...

Read More >

Global PE value fueled by exits in Q3

A series of exit megadeals doubled the value recorded in Q3 2019, while global buyout activity lost ...

Read More >