09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/
Related
Welcome to the latest issue of the Ogletree Deakins International Employment Update - a newsletter a...
Read More >
On September 18, 2019, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 5, thereby establishing a law that purpo...
Read More >
A federal jury in Iowa has rejected Equal Pay Act claims by a female physician alleging she was paid...
Read More >
As we reported, New York State has enacted laws prohibiting mandatory arbitration of sexual harassme...
Read More >
Buyout firms planning an acquisition or preparing a portfolio company for exit must consider the imp...
Read More >
Amendment to Alimony Law Grants More Time to Pay Christmas Bonus - New Legislation Enacted - Law ...
Read More >