X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

Federal Court Rules that the FAA Preempts New York Law Prohibiting Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims

In response to the #MeToo movement, New York State has led the way in enacting legislation to expand...

Read More >

Obesity Is Always a Disability Under the Washington Law Against Discrimination

In a departure from the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other state anti-discrimin...

Read More >

Pensions: What's new this week - 19 August

Welcome to your weekly update from the Allen & Overy Pensions team, bringing you up to speed on the ...

Read More >

What Developers Need to Know About New Philadelphia Tax Legislation Affecting Development Projects

Responding to calls from Philadelphia’s housing advocates to generate tax revenue for affordable ho...

Read More >

November 2019: Crisis Law Update

Lessons Learned from a MeToo Settlement - When a high-ranking female company executive endures year...

Read More >

Planning for an M&A Transaction: Key commercial terms to look-out for

When participating in an M&A process involving a video game company, whether you are on the sell-sid...

Read More >