09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Related
NC-OSHA is a solid state-OSHA plan. They believe that their approach best reflect the needs of their...
Read More >
In a departure from the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other state anti-discrimin...
Read More >
The Situation: The Australian Taxation Office ("ATO") has broadened its role in the process for revi...
Read More >
On 27 June 2019 the European Commission imposed a fine of €28 million on the Japanese imaging and o...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: As the mercury rises, California employers must comply with regulatory requiremen...
Read More >
The Polish government is planning to implement a special procedure to control acquisitions of "prote...
Read More >