09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/
Related
New York is on the precipice of passing a law that would allow employees to easily file liens agains...
Read More >
As we previously reported, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered that the EEO...
Read More >
If you’re currently sheltering in place, hoping to read something to take your mind off the novel c...
Read More >
Obermayer is excited to introduce its new “GovCon Examiner Live” webinar series, your resource fo...
Read More >
Imagine the following. A developer consults with an architect in 2020 about a six-building condomini...
Read More >
US parties should consider international arbitration, rather than standard NDA dispute resolution pr...
Read More >