X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

FTC Announces 2020 Increases to HSR and Clayton Act Thresholds

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on January 28, 2020, the reporting thresholds under Sec...

Read More >

California And Illinois Move Forward On Healthcare Laws To Protect Patient Safety

Key Points- California law provides enhanced whistleblower protection to employees who work in heal...

Read More >

Beginning Construction Continuity Safe Harbor Extended for National Security Concerns

Recognizing that, in some situations, a plan to develop or construct a facility or energy property m...

Read More >

Alert: Review of EU Competition Rules on Vertical Agreements

European Commission publishes findings of its evaluation of EU competition rules on vertical agreeme...

Read More >

California Supreme Court Rejects Conversion Claim for Unpaid Wages

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Voris v. Lampert, the California Supreme Court held that unpaid wages cannot b...

Read More >