X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

The Costly Risk Everyone Forgets About in M&A

Overlooking cybersecurity during due diligence could lead to a rude awakening. Most professionals a...

Read More >

Mexico: Increase to the UMA Value Announced for 2020

On January 9, 2020, the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI by its acronym in Span...

Read More >

2019 Connecticut Tax Developments

On June 26, 2019, Governor Ned Lamont signed a $43.4 billion budget for the 2020 and 2021 fiscal yea...

Read More >

What are the Life Science Transaction Trends in the Wake of the Sanitary Crisis?

In the second installment of McDermott’s webinar series, HPE Europe 2020: What are the Life Science...

Read More >

Delaware Court Again Finds Conflicted Transaction Safe Harbors Not So Safe

Limited partnerships and limited liability companies, as creatures of contract, often have in their ...

Read More >

Bill Expanding NYC Human Rights Law to Protect Independent Contractors and Freelancers Becomes Law

Seyfarth Synopsis: Once effective, the anti-discrimination and retaliation provisions of the NYC Hum...

Read More >