09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/
Related
Much like everything else in the world, M&A transactions must adjust in order to account for the imp...
Read More >
Over the last month, each of the major stock market indices has experienced extreme volatility and a...
Read More >
As most government contractors are aware, progress payments are a form of contract financing in whic...
Read More >
An employee sued her former employer alleging that she was unlawfully terminated under federal law. ...
Read More >
The Boston Planning and Development Agency (“BPDA”) has approved an amendment to the Boston Zoning...
Read More >
“Anything you can do, I can do better.” That’s essentially the sentiment floating around Albany t...
Read More >