X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

New York Closes in on Comprehensive Employee Wage Lien Law

New York is on the precipice of passing a law that would allow employees to easily file liens agains...

Read More >

EEOC Continues To Accept EEO-1 Component 2 Data After September 30 Deadline

As we previously reported, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered that the EEO...

Read More >

COVID-19 Update - In Case You Missed It: Interesting Items for Corporate Counsel - March 2020

If you’re currently sheltering in place, hoping to read something to take your mind off the novel c...

Read More >

Enforceability Errors: Avoiding a Common Pitfall in NDAs

US parties should consider international arbitration, rather than standard NDA dispute resolution pr...

Read More >