09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/
Related
Market Trends: What You Need to Know - As reflected in the American Bar Association's Private Targe...
Read More >
On January 13, 2020, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) issued final r...
Read More >
The Oregon Court of Appeals recently issued a decision touching on the economic loss doctrine and vi...
Read More >
A federal judge recently dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the Occupational Safety and Health Admini...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage & Hour Division issued a proposed rule on th...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) recently determined in Johnson Controls, Inc., 368 NLR...
Read More >