X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

M&A Purchase Price Considerations in the Context of COVID-19

Much like everything else in the world, M&A transactions must adjust in order to account for the imp...

Read More >

The Potential Impact Of The Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic On Hostile M&A and Shareholder Activism In The U.S.

Over the last month, each of the major stock market indices has experienced extreme volatility and a...

Read More >

COVID-19 Update: Department Of Defense Issues Class Deviation, Increasing Certain Progress Payment Ceilings

As most government contractors are aware, progress payments are a form of contract financing in whic...

Read More >

Fifth Circuit Holds Procedural Unconscionability Determination Was From Judge, Not Arbitrator, Despite Delegation Clause

An employee sued her former employer alleging that she was unlawfully terminated under federal law. ...

Read More >

BPDA Approves Fair Housing Zoning Amendment

The Boston Planning and Development Agency (“BPDA”) has approved an amendment to the Boston Zoning...

Read More >

Will New York Be The Next Gig Economy Battlefield?

“Anything you can do, I can do better.” That’s essentially the sentiment floating around Albany t...

Read More >