09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/
Related
Although special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) have been used for decades as alternative inv...
Read More >
In Crashfund LLC v. FaZe Clan, investors in Wanderset Inc. sued successor e-gaming company, FaZe Cla...
Read More >
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE Act) recently became law. Many...
Read More >
On September 24, 2019, the Ohio Supreme Court announced the General Assembly has broad authority to ...
Read More >
I was born in 1972 and aside from fashion, music, and interior decorating, I’m a fan of the 1970s, ...
Read More >
On October 30, 2019, Verrill and MassPay held an in-person seminar program on how to build a respect...
Read More >