X
09Sep

Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.

The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By: Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/

Related

Indemnification as an Exclusive Remedy

Market Trends: What You Need to Know - As reflected in the American Bar Association's Private Targe...

Read More >

CFIUS: Final Foreign Investment Regulations Implement 2018 Law

On January 13, 2020, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) issued final r...

Read More >

Oregon Court of Appeals Addresses Economic Loss Doctrine and Vicarious Liability in Construction Dispute

The Oregon Court of Appeals recently issued a decision touching on the economic loss doctrine and vi...

Read More >

OSHA Reporting Freeze Continues As Court Dismisses Challenge

A federal judge recently dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the Occupational Safety and Health Admini...

Read More >

WHD Proposes Rule on Fluctuating Workweek

Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage & Hour Division issued a proposed rule on th...

Read More >

Board Ends Union’s “Gotcha” Strategy to Counter Anticipatory Withdrawal of Recognition

The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) recently determined in Johnson Controls, Inc., 368 NLR...

Read More >