09Sep
Irreconcilable Differences: In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., Ninth Circuit Overrules 35-Year-Old Authority; Concludes ERISA Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration.
The Ninth Circuit recently issued two decisions in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp.: the first overrules the decision in Amaro v. Continental Can. Co., 724 F.2d 747 (9th Cir. 1984) (Dorman, – F.3d –, No. 18-15281, 2019 WL 3926990 (9th Cir. Aug. 20,...
By:
Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/irreconcilable-differences-in-dorman-v-58535/
Related
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on January 28, 2020, the reporting thresholds under Sec...
Read More >
Key Points- California law provides enhanced whistleblower protection to employees who work in heal...
Read More >
Recognizing that, in some situations, a plan to develop or construct a facility or energy property m...
Read More >
European Commission publishes findings of its evaluation of EU competition rules on vertical agreeme...
Read More >
On May 14, 2019, Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed into law HB 2992, which, as of January 1, 2020, r...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Voris v. Lampert, the California Supreme Court held that unpaid wages cannot b...
Read More >