09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
On July 3, 2019, California governor Gavin Newsom signed the Crown Act into law, making California t...
Read More >
After much anticipation, the United States Department of Labor has issued a final overtime rule that...
Read More >
Recent reports of abuse in nursing homes are not only disturbing; they also shed light on the diffic...
Read More >
As we move into 2020, there are signs that the M&A market may be slowing down. Global trade issues,...
Read More >
Robinson+Cole’s Construction Group is pleased to bring you a recap of posts from our Construction L...
Read More >
Q. An employee at one of my company’s facilities in New York recently complained to his supervisor...
Read More >