09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
In the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd and the resulting Black Lives Matters protests, many...
Read More >
1. PHILADELPHIA DELAYS ENACTMENT OF FAIR WORKWEEK ORDINANCE - Philadelphia employers received an ea...
Read More >
The Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment – Division of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) and...
Read More >
With a constantly evolving legal landscape, colleges, universities and independent schools encounter...
Read More >
Employees in Puerto Rico may take up to 15 days of unpaid leave each calendar year to address situat...
Read More >
On January 28, 2020, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the agency charged with administering ...
Read More >