09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
California AB 51’s ban on mandatory employment arbitration remains stayed for now. AB 51 was passed...
Read More >
In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode Wink of an Eye which aired o...
Read More >
Last night, I had the opportunity (again) to sit on a panel discussion sponsored by the Accelerator ...
Read More >
On November 20, 2019, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the fluctuating workweek (“FWW”) m...
Read More >
Financial institutions M&A sector trends: specialty finance/marketplace lending — H2 2019 and outlo...
Read More >
What constitutes sexual harassment? There are two categories of sexual harassment as specified by ...
Read More >