09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litig., C.A. No. 2017-0337-SG (Del. Ch. July 9, 2020) - After investi...
Read More >
Rock Health called the landmark Teladoc-Livongo deal a starter pistol for the virtual care platform ...
Read More >
The United States Department of Labor today released new regulations that dramatically change the ex...
Read More >
As the summer begins to wind down, the first whispers of fall rippling through cool evening breezes ...
Read More >
As the conversation around antitrust regulation continues to grow, especially given the current poli...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: After granting a temporary restraining order days before AB 51 was to go into eff...
Read More >