09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
The security of payment regime in Queensland has undergone significant reform in recent years. Since...
Read More >
The Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 2005 (the “Bill”) on June 30, 2019, creating a new progra...
Read More >
More than 26 million custom emoji have been created in Slack and the use of emoji in Teams is univer...
Read More >
The current COVID-19 pandemic is causing an unprecedented negative impact on businesses around the g...
Read More >
Pillsbury secured an important victory for its client, Solera Holdings Inc., when Delaware Superior ...
Read More >
Overview of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market in Singapore - Singapore was one of the first cou...
Read More >