09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
The IRS issues anticipated continuity guidance providing relief to offshore wind developers and fede...
Read More >
The Seventh Circuit held that retirees and their families were entitled to lifetime healthcare benef...
Read More >
On Thursday, February 4, Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Su...
Read More >
Corporate Governance and Securities Law Developments - Directors Can Be Held Liable for Failure to ...
Read More >
On March 18, 2020, the City of Cambridge announced a Temporary Emergency Construction Moratorium “M...
Read More >
Yesterday, Alvotech announced that its parent company, Alvotech Holdings SA, completed a $65 million...
Read More >