09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
Governor Wolf announced that Pennsylvania construction companies will be permitted to resume operati...
Read More >
Employers today face constant hurdles in their day-to-day operations, and startups are no different....
Read More >
Many jurisdictions have allowed construction activities to continue through the COVID-19 pandemic. B...
Read More >
This is the last article in our three-part series focused on the implications of robots and artifici...
Read More >
A recent decision from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the highest court of Massachusetts,...
Read More >
The New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) has published guidance on the state’s salary histor...
Read More >