09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
This week’s Update features a number of updates on previous stories, including our recent story on ...
Read More >
While the California Labor Code specifies that an off-duty meal period must consist of at least 30 m...
Read More >
The increasing and dynamic impact of the novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) is tangible. For example, on J...
Read More >
Anteriormente, hemos analizado la forma en que el aprovechamiento de los conocimientos especializado...
Read More >
Of all the challenges an entrepreneur will face during the life cycle of a venture, one of the most ...
Read More >
Earlier this month, Governor Pritzker signed into law SB 1557, revising the Recreational Cannabis La...
Read More >