09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
President Vladimir Putin signed a package of laws (informally referred to as the Investment Code) on...
Read More >
International Construction Arbitration has received a shock. Consistent with the leading textbooks, ...
Read More >
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals recently handed the Federal Trade Commission another appellate vict...
Read More >
On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed into law the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement ...
Read More >
This past February we reported that the Supreme Court agreed to review the Fifth Circuit’s ruling i...
Read More >
In the Matter of Giora Neeman v Town of Warwick, __AD3d__, 2020 NY Slip Op 03112, the Second Departm...
Read More >