09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
No harassment as conduct not related to sex - The EAT decision in Raj v Capita Business Services Lt...
Read More >
A recently passed Florida law, Florida Statutes 542.336 seeks to prevent medical providers from usin...
Read More >
In 2010, Arizona voters approved a medical marijuana law that applies to most employers. Generally, ...
Read More >
On Thursday, January 30, members from Verrill's Employment & Labor group, as well as some from the E...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: • Samsung faces child labor charges in France. (FT) ...
Read More >
New U.S. Treasury rules expanding the jurisdiction of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the Uni...
Read More >