09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. Former Uber engineer charged with theft of trade s...
Read More >
Digital Health Companies Look Toward IPOs as M&A Stabilizes - Digital health funding in 2019 sugges...
Read More >
The current COVID-19 pandemic is causing an unprecedented negative impact on businesses around the g...
Read More >
The state of California recently passed legislation that amends the definition of race under the Cal...
Read More >
Continuing on a recent trend in New Jersey, employees who use medical marijuana received another lay...
Read More >
On July 31, 2019, the Ministry of Labor (the “ML”) published the Protocol for the Legitimation of ...
Read More >