09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
A recent softening of the Trump administration’s stance on undocumented migrant workers may signal ...
Read More >
Welcome to the first day of a five-day podcast series Jay Rosen and I are releasing in honor of the ...
Read More >
Regulation Best Interest: Rollover Recommendations for Pension Plan Benefits (Rollovers Part 8) - T...
Read More >
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s issuance of a...
Read More >
The third quarter of 2019 saw a slight decrease in venture private capital funding levels according ...
Read More >
Following a robust 2018, 2019 saw a modest slowdown in automotive M&A activity and a decline in deal...
Read More >