09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
As 2019 comes to a close, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) remains active bo...
Read More >
A recent decision by the Third District Court of Appeals has engendered uncertainty about the manner...
Read More >
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS & ADVISORY SERVICES - Small Business Administration – The SBA issued a pr...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been busy the past few weeks. Below are the top five h...
Read More >
Restrictive covenants are “building schemes” that operate outside of – and in addition to – muni...
Read More >
In a decision of interest to private equity investors, the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Court”...
Read More >