09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
Join Maya Hamouie and Gabriela Pérez on December 5, 2019 for “ABC to AB 5: Changes to Independent C...
Read More >
While Delaware’s “stay at home” order remains in place amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the Delaware S...
Read More >
On August 12, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued three proposed amendments to th...
Read More >
Critics of modern antitrust enforcement have been building momentum towards antitrust reform over th...
Read More >
On Thursday, November 15, 2019, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) held the fourth...
Read More >
TMPR: FCA update on adding new sub-fund to umbrella scheme - The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA...
Read More >