09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
SCOTUS Reviews "Blissful Ignorance" as Statute of Limitations Defense - On December 4, 2019, the U....
Read More >
For the first time in over 50 years, the City of Portland is rewriting its Land Use Code, which is f...
Read More >
The need to replenish intellectual property has pushed the pharma industry to the highest-performing...
Read More >
On July 10, 2019, the California Senate Labor, Public Employment, and Retirement Committee (Committe...
Read More >
The Western Australian government has sought industry comment on a suite of significant proposed ref...
Read More >
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently held in In re Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Lit...
Read More >