09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
On October 11, 2019, Vice Chancellor Kathaleen S. McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery dismis...
Read More >
Dear YouDig?, As an Ohio highway contractor we must include an incredible amount of temporary struc...
Read More >
I get it. My last name is Kim. My appearance, as those of you who haven’t met me can tell by my pho...
Read More >
On September 8, 2020, the new Agency for the Protection and Development of Competition (the “Agency...
Read More >
Bricker & Eckler's construction attorneys are proud to present "Top Gun," our premier Midwest constr...
Read More >
The American Bar Association’s (ABA) Business Law Section has released its 2019 Private Target Deal...
Read More >