09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
Retailer Permitted Disability Harassment at West Virginia Store, Then Retaliated Against Employee Fo...
Read More >
The #Metoo movement has shed substantial light upon issues surrounding workplace sexual harassment, ...
Read More >
Despite the heightened attention to avoiding and addressing sexual harassment claims in the wake of ...
Read More >
On February 26, 2020, the National Labor Relations Board (the NLRB) issued its final rule governing ...
Read More >
Recent M&A deals the teams have worked on involving insolvent corporates have highlighted the challe...
Read More >
In Spring of this year, I read an article about a “cool” and “savvy” 43-year-old high school tea...
Read More >