09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
Bricker & Eckler's construction attorneys are proud to present "Top Gun," our premier Midwest constr...
Read More >
The Work Injury Compensation Bill 2019 (the Bill) was passed in Parliament on 3 September 2019. Broa...
Read More >
On July 3, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom approved Senate Bill No. 188 providing legal prote...
Read More >
The Third Circuit recently opened the door to exempting Uber drivers from the Federal Arbitration Ac...
Read More >
The U.S. Supreme Court settled the long-standing dispute regarding the viability of class arbitratio...
Read More >
Last Tuesday, February 18, 2020, Australis Capital Inc. announced the termination of its proposed ac...
Read More >