09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
Hot on the heels of recent updates to the DIFC employment law, DIFC Employment Law No. 2 of 2019, th...
Read More >
A few weeks ago, the Work from Home Regulations were published in the Official Gazette, by Executive...
Read More >
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in BGT Holdings LLC v. United States, recently he...
Read More >
The fluctuating workweek (FWW) pay method allows employers to pay salaried, nonexempt employees a fi...
Read More >
Amid widespread business disruptions and economic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, many ...
Read More >
We’re now just a few weeks away from the nation’s most stringent independent contractor misclassif...
Read More >