09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
The SECURE Act was enacted into law. It is effective on January 1, 2020. The Act makes significant c...
Read More >
It seems that it is impossible to talk to any fund today without learning that a SPAC is planned or ...
Read More >
Over a million Californians have said they want a chance to vote on the misclassification law that t...
Read More >
Unlicensed contractors in Georgia recently were dealt a blow by the state's Court of Appeals when th...
Read More >
In Dutra v. Batterton, No. 18-266, the Supreme Court of the United States, on June 24, 2019, determi...
Read More >
Every player interested or already active in the German market needs to have a working knowledge of ...
Read More >