09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
Warburg Pincus and Martis Capital are merging their respective portfolio companies, Qualifacts and C...
Read More >
The Social Security Administration (SSA) resumed sending Employer Correction Request Notices, more c...
Read More >
Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney if you have any questions about these developments. ©2019 Ja...
Read More >
Executive Summary. On May 21, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments ...
Read More >
We’ve been blogging about attacks on workplace arbitration for over ten years now. AB 51 represents...
Read More >
Senior Living Provider Rescinded Employment Offer and Refused to Accommodate Applicant With a Disabi...
Read More >