09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
Last week, the Chicago City Council passed the Chicago Fair Workweek Ordinance (“the Ordinance”), ...
Read More >
On Oct. 13, 2019, New York City enacted Int. 136-A (the Law), expanding the employment protections o...
Read More >
On September 24, 2019, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) issued its final rule revising th...
Read More >
As we know, a temporary residence permit (razreshenie na vremennoye prozhivanie) confirms a foreign ...
Read More >
In yet another break from precedent, the NLRB held recently that employers can have policies barring...
Read More >
The IRS issues anticipated guidance providing relief to developers facing delays related to COVID-19...
Read More >