09Feb
Chancery Rules on Equitable Fee Shifting and Indemnity Provisions in Support of Fee Shifting
On December 31, 2020, Vice Chancellor Glasscock issued an opinion regarding what he called a “novel issue” arising from cross motions for fees. The motions were supported by a contractual prevailing party fee provision which also provided for an equitable award where a party prevailed in part and lost in part. The case, Great Hill Equity Partners IV v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, CA No. 7906-VCG (Del. Ch. 2020) was hard fought, lengthy, costly, and yielded very little for the parties. Vice...
By:
Snell & Wilmer
Related
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed emergency legislation extending to January 1, 2021 - the...
Read More >
New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed Executive Order #142 on Wednesday, May 13, 2020, permitting s...
Read More >
The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) adopted regulations on February 21, 20...
Read More >
It’s now official. After months of speculation, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bi...
Read More >
Most 401(k) plans have an investment policy statement to serve as a blueprint on how and why investm...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: A new decision reinforces that the National Labor Relations Board will invalidate...
Read More >