30Jan
Mere Change?—“F” Reorganization Qualifies in Spite of Change in Plan
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.” Perhaps that quote is a tad strong to apply generally to corporate reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Plans, after all, are very important—if not essential—in the context of corporate reorganizations. However, based on a recent Private Letter Ruling, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) noted that the “plan of reorganization” requirement for an “F”...
By:
Freeman Law
Related
In Heinze v. Tesco Corp., No. 19-20298, 2020 WL 4814094 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 2020), the United States ...
Read More >
Employers will soon be required to provide paid sick time to employees who perform at least 80 hours...
Read More >
Must 100% of Service Charges Be Distributed to Service Employees? A June 27, 2019 California appell...
Read More >
The amendments will become effective on January 4, 2021, with earlier compliance permitted. The ame...
Read More >
As the UK’s expected departure from the European Union approaches – currently scheduled for Octobe...
Read More >
Employers must understand what they can and cannot do now that the Social Security Administration (S...
Read More >