30Jan
Mere Change?—“F” Reorganization Qualifies in Spite of Change in Plan
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.” Perhaps that quote is a tad strong to apply generally to corporate reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Plans, after all, are very important—if not essential—in the context of corporate reorganizations. However, based on a recent Private Letter Ruling, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) noted that the “plan of reorganization” requirement for an “F”...
By:
Freeman Law
Related
On February 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the annual changes to the Hart-Sco...
Read More >
On July 24, 2019, South Carolina joined the ranks of Alabama, Pennsylvania, and others in abolishing...
Read More >
As we say goodbye (and good riddance) to an incredibly challenging 2020, we thought it would be usef...
Read More >
Nearly a decade has passed since the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) first report...
Read More >
The EEOC’s September 30th deadline for all covered employers to submit pay data for 2017 and 2018 w...
Read More >
Volatile trading markets and economic instability may prompt taxpayers to modify, purchase, or repur...
Read More >