30Jan
Mere Change?—“F” Reorganization Qualifies in Spite of Change in Plan
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.” Perhaps that quote is a tad strong to apply generally to corporate reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Plans, after all, are very important—if not essential—in the context of corporate reorganizations. However, based on a recent Private Letter Ruling, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) noted that the “plan of reorganization” requirement for an “F”...
By:
Freeman Law
Related
On December 16, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a decision in Caesars Ent...
Read More >
With the March 16, 2020 effective date of the new rule interpreting joint employer status under the ...
Read More >
The recently announced dispute between BorgWarner Inc. and Delphi Technologies PLC relating to BorgW...
Read More >
Leveraged loan agreements form key aspects of capital structures, balancing lender protection agains...
Read More >
Recently, the comment period ended for the Department of Labor’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seek...
Read More >
On May 21, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) adopted rule amendments that will ...
Read More >