30Jan
Mere Change?—“F” Reorganization Qualifies in Spite of Change in Plan
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.” Perhaps that quote is a tad strong to apply generally to corporate reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Plans, after all, are very important—if not essential—in the context of corporate reorganizations. However, based on a recent Private Letter Ruling, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) noted that the “plan of reorganization” requirement for an “F”...
By:
Freeman Law
Related
On September 24, 2019, the US Department of Labor announced a finalized rule increasing the earnings...
Read More >
In Caesars Entertainment d/b/a Rio All-Suites Hotel and Casino, Case 28-CA-060841 (December 16, 2019...
Read More >
The Situation: As part of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") continued focus on r...
Read More >
Swift Acquisition Corp. v. Krauss, et al., Case No. 2019-0509-PAF (Del. Ch. Aug. 25, 2020)—The Dela...
Read More >
A recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court emphasizes the importance of fully disclosing materi...
Read More >
The UK Government has con?rmed that it will extend to the private sector tax rules designed to targe...
Read More >