30Jan
Mere Change?—“F” Reorganization Qualifies in Spite of Change in Plan
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.” Perhaps that quote is a tad strong to apply generally to corporate reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Plans, after all, are very important—if not essential—in the context of corporate reorganizations. However, based on a recent Private Letter Ruling, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) noted that the “plan of reorganization” requirement for an “F”...
By:
Freeman Law
Related
An employee who paid “fair share” union fees under protest is not entitled to damages to refund an...
Read More >
If the 2008 recession gives us the ability to predict anything about upcoming trends in commercial l...
Read More >
In a case where the jury found both the Architect and the Developer separately responsible for Plain...
Read More >
Picture this: Your company is in a highly competitive industry with several leading players heavily ...
Read More >
On August 5, 2020, the Governor of Georgia signed Senate Bill 315 to legislatively overrule a Septem...
Read More >
Synopsis: The Department of Labor (“DOL”) just issued proposed rule changes governing the disclosu...
Read More >