30Jan
Mere Change?—“F” Reorganization Qualifies in Spite of Change in Plan
Former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “Plans are of little importance, but planning is essential.” Perhaps that quote is a tad strong to apply generally to corporate reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Plans, after all, are very important—if not essential—in the context of corporate reorganizations. However, based on a recent Private Letter Ruling, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) noted that the “plan of reorganization” requirement for an “F”...
By:
Freeman Law
Related
On July 1, 2019, the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor issued several new opini...
Read More >
1. Non-Competition Agreements Prohibited for Low Wage Earners in Maryland - Maryland law prohibits ...
Read More >
California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board adopted a new safety rule on January 16...
Read More >
Public discourse on “healthcare” has focused primarily on health insurance and the significant cha...
Read More >
As noted in an earlier Alert, on January 9, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission held a public worksho...
Read More >
In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode Patterns of Force which aire...
Read More >