29Dec
Kuharchik: A Home Run for Heavy Highway Electrical Contractors’ Tax Obligations
This past summer, Cohen Seglias attorneys Roy Cohen, Ashling Ehrhardt, and Sydney Pierce obtained a victory for their client Kuharchik Construction against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Kuharchik Construction, Inc. v. Commonwealth. In Kuharchik, the Commonwealth Court ruled in Kuharchik’s favor on its appeal from the Pennsylvania Board of Finance and Revenue, finding that the poles, mast arms, and pedestals used in constructing traffic signals on roads and highways are included in the...
By:
Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC
Related
What constitutes sexual harassment? Portuguese law foresees two types of harassment: 1. Sexual har...
Read More >
With last Wednesday’s categorization by the World Health Organization of COVID-19 as a pandemic, sc...
Read More >
In what passes for high drama in the world of Massachusetts land use law, the Supreme Judicial Court...
Read More >
The origins of the FIDIC suite - The Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils (FIDIC) was ...
Read More >
On June 14, 2019 the Kansas Supreme Court ruled in Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd (No. 112,765.) that the s...
Read More >
Effective January 1, 2020, the protections in the New York City Administrative Code, Section 8-107 (...
Read More >