21Nov
UPDATE: Supreme Judicial Court Holds That Each Building in Phased-Development Projects Constitutes Distinct “Improvement” for Purposes of Statute of Repose
Imagine the following. A developer consults with an architect in 2020 about a six-building condominium project. The architect promptly produces a set of plans, which are stamped by an engineer. Over the next three years, the developer secures the necessary permitting from a notoriously stingy local planning board. The developer finally breaks ground in 2024. He completes buildings 1-3 in 2026. Then a recession hits and the developer suspends construction for three years......
By:
Conn Kavanaugh
Related
ANTITRUST AND COMPETITION - The European Commission To Pursue Its Existing Doctrine On The Applicati...
Read More >
An Illinois appellate court recently clarified the outer limits of the controversial “inevitable di...
Read More >
Construction projects in Philadelphia now need to grapple with the City’s March 22 updated “Busine...
Read More >
The Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) created under the CARES Act has provided much needed econo...
Read More >
At the final sessions of the year, Philadelphia City Council passed three ordinances affecting real ...
Read More >
Q: Are non-competes enforceable in Iowa? A: Yes, but with a whole lot of caveats. Enforceability d...
Read More >