09Oct
Jurisdictional issues in deals involving joint ventures: Review of the General Court judgment in HeidelbergCement and Schwenk Zement (T-380/17)
The judgment provides useful jurisdictional clarifications for deals involving joint ventures (JVs) acting as an acquirer. The General Court (GC) confirms that when the true players behind the transaction are the parent companies, rather than the JV - because they did the deal valuation, negotiated the transaction structure, and determined the purchase price - the parent companies are the relevant undertakings to consider when determining whether the merger thresholds are met. This can have a...
By:
Latham & Watkins LLP
Related
Under California’s Proposition 60, which became enacted in 1986 as Revenue and Taxation Code sectio...
Read More >
Considerations when reviewing your MAC Clause in a COVID-19 Climate - As was the case after the glo...
Read More >
Dear YouDig? We build interstates. We always have a need for good hard working laborers. Yesterday ...
Read More >
As winter once again approaches, employers, particularly those in cold-weather states, face the recu...
Read More >
The non-ERISA §403(b) space is the last bastion of high, hidden costs in retirement plans. That’s t...
Read More >
In most jurisdictions, it is standard practice to include a “no-rehire” clause when negotiating a ...
Read More >