09Oct
Jurisdictional issues in deals involving joint ventures: Review of the General Court judgment in HeidelbergCement and Schwenk Zement (T-380/17)
The judgment provides useful jurisdictional clarifications for deals involving joint ventures (JVs) acting as an acquirer. The General Court (GC) confirms that when the true players behind the transaction are the parent companies, rather than the JV - because they did the deal valuation, negotiated the transaction structure, and determined the purchase price - the parent companies are the relevant undertakings to consider when determining whether the merger thresholds are met. This can have a...
By:
Latham & Watkins LLP
Related
On December 19, 2019, the federal government announced that proposed changes to the tax treatment of...
Read More >
In April 2011, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) requested information from the public on how the D...
Read More >
The First Circuit reverses a lower court decision and finds two Sun Capital private equity funds are...
Read More >
This three-part webinar series will guide leaders of independent medical groups through the process ...
Read More >
As companies increasingly look to artificial intelligence (“AI”) solutions to streamline their bus...
Read More >
The primary objective of the guidelines is to improve financial reporting by addressing issues relat...
Read More >