17Sep
Chancery Rules Failure to Disclose “Intrinsic Value” Precludes Corwin Defense – But Does Not Necessarily Suggest a Breach of the Duty of Loyalty
In In re USG Corp. S’holder Litig., 2020 WL 5126671 (Del. Ch. Aug. 31, 2020), the Court of Chancery granted the director-defendants’ motions to dismiss post-closing money damages claims arising out of the sale of USG Corporation (“USG”) for less than what USG’s directors allegedly thought was its intrinsic value. Although the failure to disclose such “intrinsic value” prevented dismissal under Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings, LLC, 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015), Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III held...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
As the 2019 legislative year is about to come to a close, there are a number of critical labor and e...
Read More >
The Situation: The Australian government has introduced significant changes to its foreign investmen...
Read More >
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision in Morrison v. Berry illustrates the protections prov...
Read More >
State pay equity laws, in large part, has been a response to a perception that the federal governmen...
Read More >
As most government contractors are aware, progress payments are a form of contract financing in whic...
Read More >
California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”) has updated its Employer FAQ guid...
Read More >