17Sep
Chancery Rules Failure to Disclose “Intrinsic Value” Precludes Corwin Defense – But Does Not Necessarily Suggest a Breach of the Duty of Loyalty
In In re USG Corp. S’holder Litig., 2020 WL 5126671 (Del. Ch. Aug. 31, 2020), the Court of Chancery granted the director-defendants’ motions to dismiss post-closing money damages claims arising out of the sale of USG Corporation (“USG”) for less than what USG’s directors allegedly thought was its intrinsic value. Although the failure to disclose such “intrinsic value” prevented dismissal under Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings, LLC, 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015), Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III held...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
On August 22, 2019, a three-member panel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled unanimou...
Read More >
Stock Market Commentary - Trade and interest rates continued to be the headline market movers for ...
Read More >
In McDonald v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, 2020 UT 11, the Utah Supreme Court recently s...
Read More >
As employers are well aware, the pay and hours worked data component of the EEO-1 (known as “Compon...
Read More >
This Employment Law This Week® Monthly Rundown discusses the most important developments for employe...
Read More >
In 2019, the Legislature enacted several bills affecting healthcare practitioners in New Mexico. Alt...
Read More >