17Sep
Chancery Rules Failure to Disclose “Intrinsic Value” Precludes Corwin Defense – But Does Not Necessarily Suggest a Breach of the Duty of Loyalty
In In re USG Corp. S’holder Litig., 2020 WL 5126671 (Del. Ch. Aug. 31, 2020), the Court of Chancery granted the director-defendants’ motions to dismiss post-closing money damages claims arising out of the sale of USG Corporation (“USG”) for less than what USG’s directors allegedly thought was its intrinsic value. Although the failure to disclose such “intrinsic value” prevented dismissal under Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings, LLC, 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015), Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III held...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Last June, the Be’er Sheva Regional Labor Court published an unusual decision. It concerned a femal...
Read More >
The Internal Revenue Service recently announced its cost-of-living adjustments applicable to dollar ...
Read More >
Due to the strict deadlines and responsibilities of each party, one of the industries most affected ...
Read More >
In the continued fallout from the “me too” movement, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont has signed ne...
Read More >
The Tenth Circuit upheld a claims administrator’s decision denying a claim for residential mental h...
Read More >
Refusing to enforce a non-solicitation provision that violated public policy, the Colorado Court of ...
Read More >