17Sep
Chancery Rules Failure to Disclose “Intrinsic Value” Precludes Corwin Defense – But Does Not Necessarily Suggest a Breach of the Duty of Loyalty
In In re USG Corp. S’holder Litig., 2020 WL 5126671 (Del. Ch. Aug. 31, 2020), the Court of Chancery granted the director-defendants’ motions to dismiss post-closing money damages claims arising out of the sale of USG Corporation (“USG”) for less than what USG’s directors allegedly thought was its intrinsic value. Although the failure to disclose such “intrinsic value” prevented dismissal under Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings, LLC, 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015), Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III held...
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
On January 18, 2021, the Office of Planning (“OP”) introduced its first set of proposed amendments...
Read More >
Major developments in the area of wage and hour law are happening right now in Harrisburg and happen...
Read More >
On Tuesday, December 1, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Makan Delrahim expressed support fo...
Read More >
Somewhere, some employer might be thinking: Hey, why don’t I make employees sign a promissory note ...
Read More >
Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance relat...
Read More >
As the #metoo movement strengthened in 2018, the State of California worked quickly to enact legisla...
Read More >