26Aug
Chancery Denies Derivative Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Work Product Prepared by Oracle’s Special Litigation Committee
In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litig., C.A. No. 2017-0337-SG (Del. Ch. July 9, 2020) - After investigating certain potential derivative claims arising out of Oracle Corporation’s acquisition of NetSuite, Inc., and after trying unsuccessfully to settle those claims, Oracle’s Special Litigation Committee (“SLC”) agreed that permitting a derivative plaintiff to pursue those claims was in Oracle’s best interests....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The recent arbitration decision in Sasktel v Unifor, Local 2S, 2019 CanLII 57057 (SK LA) arose after...
Read More >
As you are aware from these pages, Connecticut’s General Assembly produced a plethora of bills affe...
Read More >
In early July, an appeals court ruled that Amazon should be considered a “seller” of goods under P...
Read More >
Do meal period premiums trigger derivative liability for waiting-time penalties and inaccurate wage ...
Read More >
Disclosure-based strike suits have died an inglorious and richly-deserved death in Delaware. Lest de...
Read More >
One hotly debated aspect of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) has been the so-called “Cadillac Tax”...
Read More >